The ONLY obstacle is the massive, entrenched wealth and power
of the fossil fuel corporations.
Policies which would limit the free license
of fossil fuel corporations to blow us past our planetary carbon budget are little more than the feverish dreams of civil society and nations already bearing the brunt of a warmed world.
The EU has so far continued to align itself with historic polluters like the USA and Australia, blocking progress towards a conflict of interest policy which could protect the UN climate talks from the harmful influence
of fossil fuel corporations and their lobbyists, who have been delaying and weakening progress on effective climate action.
We challenge the power
of fossil fuel corporations, bolster support for renewable and citizen - powered energy and seek to hold big polluters to account.
It is not surprising that the eco-pragmatists attract support from conservatives who have doggedly resisted all measures to cut greenhouse gas emissions, defended the interests
of fossil fuel corporations, and in some cases worked hard to trash climate science.
Not exact matches
Archbishop Desmond Tutu, one
of the most revered figures
of South Africa's anti-apartheid struggle and a key backer
of the divestment campaign that helped end the system, was an early backer
of fossil fuel divestment and said in 2014: «People
of conscience need to break their ties with
corporations financing the injustice
of climate change.»
BC Chamber
of Commerce massively promotes and supports these
fossil fuel and energy projects, since they believe it enhances «business growth» in BC, and since it appears only money talks in this province, boycotting their membership is a first step in demanding those
corporations take an ethical stand for the protection
of BC on this matter.
BC is one
of few provinces with no limit on corporate donations (as is Saskatchewan, whose leading political party appears to have benefitted handsomely from vast sums
of money from Alberta - based
fossil fuel corporations over the last decade).
At 8:15 a.m., grassroots organizations rally to urge Cuomo to stand up
fossil fuel corporations and executives, outside
of the New York Stock Exchange, 11 Wall St., Manhattan.
Unlike Germany, the U.S. has vast deposits
of fossil fuels owned by powerful
corporations.
Shifting the cost
of global warming to those who are disproportionately the perpetrators, Grossman argues, could make
fossil fuels more expensive and thus force
corporations to pay more attention to renewable energy.
And, although a few projects such as the Sleipner gas field in the North Sea or oil fields owned by the EnCana
Corporation in Calgary, Alberta have proved that CO2 can be pumped underground and remain trapped below cap rock, they are aimed at enhancing recovery
of the
fossil fuels in those fields rather than permanently storing the greenhouse gas.
Tesoro
Corporation plans to foster the development
of biocrude, made from renewable biomass, which can be co-processed in its existing refineries along with conventional
fossil crude oil to produce lower - carbon drop - in
fuels.
It's really too bad that you haven't seen fit to give even a fraction
of the attention to the very real, very serious question
of who broke into the computer system and stole the emails that you have given to legitimizing the baseless, slanderous and inflammatory charges that various
fossil fuel corporation stooges made about the emails.
AGW denialism has been manufactured by a generation - long campaign
of deliberate deceit, funded by ExxonMobil and Koch Industries and other
fossil fuel corporations that collectively rake in one billion dollars per day in profit from the ongoing business - as - usual consumption
of their destructive products.
I would respectfully suggest that «policy - makers within the GOP» have suffered much more «damage» from the millions
of dollars in campaign contributions they receive from the
fossil fuel corporations.
What that sciencey - sounding gibberish about «unproved variables» means is that you don't want to see trillions
of dollars in wealth shift from the
fossil fuel corporations to other sectors
of the industrial economy, therefore, anthropogenic global warming can not be true.
Reducing
fossil fuel use won't «shrink the economy» — quite the opposite — but it will result in the transfer
of trillions
of dollars in investments, capital and profits from the
fossil fuel corporations to other sectors
of the industrial economy.
Which is exactly the scam that the
fossil fuel corporations have gotten away with for a century or so, to their vast profit, and to the grave detriment
of everyone else.
Anyone who reads the detailed scientific explanation
of Mr. Gary Novak (/ / nov55.com/ntyg.html), can easily grasp that human use and abuse
of fossil fuels do not have a significant impact on Earth climate; and that implementing the Kyoto Protocol would only harm the health
of the economy — not only the profits
of big
corporations, but also the pockets
of all consumers — even the poorest.
Many
corporations not directly involved in
fossil fuels and timber are ahead
of the people and the politicians on these issues.
Efforts to reduce
fossil fuel use are under way at every level
of government — national, state, and city — as well as in
corporations, utilities, and universities.
CNN: The giant
corporations powering the
fossil fuel industry are warned that they face a damaging backlash if they try to resist the mounting pressures
of climate change legislation and high - profile campaigning The financial and economic muscle
of the global
fossil fuel industry's corporate behemoths will not protect them from the costly effects
of negative [continue reading...]
The warnings have been ignored or ridiculed at the international, national, state and even local level, thanks in part to a well - funded, right - wing campaign representing the short - term interests
of heavy industry, mining and
fossil fuel corporations.
That will look like a number
of things, first, continuing fights around the world to keep
fossil fuel in the ground, and second, continuing to follow the money and expose the
corporations and industries that stand in the way
of progress.
The central allegation that stands against Dr Soon is that he had had a «conflict
of interest» in that he had received much
of his research funding from
fossil -
fuel corporations and foundations but had failed to declare it in a dozen
of his 60 published papers.
Francis said that wealthy nations and multinational
corporations that use foreign debt as a way to control poorer countries, while exploiting their natural resources and polluting their land and water, owe them an «ecological debt» by limiting consumption
of fossil fuels and assisting them in more sustainable development.
Holding
corporations legally accountable for climate change is a tough challenge because
of regulatory and jurisdictional issues, statutes
of limitation, the difficulty
of assigning specific damages to any one company, and
fossil fuel companies» arguments that they acted prudently based on their assessments
of risk at the time.
The Kyoto Protocol was just ahead, which pitted the Malthusianism intelligensia and rent - seeking
corporations (such as Enron and BP) versus
fossil -
fuel consumerism and a Julian Simon view
of the world.
After months
of silence and delay, the City
of Boulder appears finally ready to announce the filing
of a climate - related lawsuit targeting «
fossil fuel - producing
corporations.»
- Climate Action Programme (Internationational): Leading economists and major
corporations call for the end
of fossil fuel investments.
Palm oil is one
of the three key biofuels that governments and
corporations are promoting as alternatives to
fossil fuels.
Says Mr. Suzuki: «The skeptics are a small group known for their support
of corporations like the
fossil fuel industry.
1 Executive Summary 2 Scope
of the Report 3 The Case for Hydrogen 3.1 The Drive for Clean Energy 3.2 The Uniqueness
of Hydrogen 3.3 Hydrogen's Safety Record 4 Hydrogen
Fuel Cells 4.1 Proton Exchange Membrane
Fuel Cell 4.2
Fuel Cells and Batteries 4.3
Fuel Cell Systems Durability 4.4
Fuel Cell Vehicles 5 Hydrogen
Fueling Infrastructure 5.1 Hydrogen Station Hardware 5.2 Hydrogen Compression and Storage 5.3 Hydrogen
Fueling 5.4 Hydrogen Station Capacity 6 Hydrogen
Fueling Station Types 6.1 Retail vs. Non-Retail Stations 6.1.1 Retail Hydrogen Stations 6.1.2 Non-Retail Hydrogen Stations 6.2 Mobile Hydrogen Stations 6.2.1 Honda's Smart Hydrogen Station 6.2.2 Nel Hydrogen's RotoLyzer 6.2.3 Others 7 Hydrogen
Fueling Protocols 7.1 SAE J2601 7.2 Related Standards 7.3
Fueling Protocols vs. Vehicle Charging 7.4 SAE J2601 vs. SAE J1772 7.5 Ionic Compression 8 Hydrogen Station Rollout Strategy 8.1 Traditional Approaches 8.2 Current Approach 8.3 Factors Impacting Rollouts 8.4 Production and Distribution Scenarios 8.5 Reliability Issues 9 Sources
of Hydrogen 9.1
Fossil Fuels 9.2 Renewable Sources 10 Methods
of Hydrogen Production 10.1 Production from Non-Renewable Sources 10.1.1 Steam Reforming
of Natural Gas 10.1.2 Coal Gasification 10.2 Production from Renewable Sources 10.2.1 Electrolysis 10.2.2 Biomass Gasification 11 Hydrogen Production Scenarios 11.1 Centralized Hydrogen Production 11.2 On - Site Hydrogen Production 11.2.1 On - site Electrolysis 11.2.2 On - Site Steam Methane Reforming 12 Hydrogen Delivery 12.1 Hydrogen Tube Trailers 12.2 Tanker Trucks 12.3 Pipeline Delivery 12.4 Railcars and Barges 13 Hydrogen Stations Cost Factors 13.1 Capital Expenditures 13.2 Operating Expenditures 14 Hydrogen Station Deployments 14.1 Asia - Pacific 14.1.1 Japan 14.1.2 Korea 14.1.3 China 14.1.4 Rest
of Asia - Pacific 14.2 Europe, Middle East & Africa (EMEA) 14.2.1 Germany 14.2.2 The U.K. 14.2.3 Nordic Region 14.2.4 Rest
of EMEA 14.3 Americas 14.3.1 U.S. West Coast 14.3.2 U.S. East Coast 14.3.3 Canada 14.3.4 Latin America 15 Selected Vendors 15.1 Air Liquide 15.2 Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. 15.3 Ballard Power Systems 15.4 FirstElement
Fuel Inc. 15.5 FuelCell Energy, Inc. 15.6 Hydrogenics
Corporation 15.7 The Linde Group 15.8 Nel Hydrogen 15.9 Nuvera
Fuel Cells 15.10 Praxair 15.11 Proton OnSite / SunHydro 15.11.1 Proton Onsite 15.11.2 SunHydro 16 Market Forecasts 16.1 Overview 16.2 Global Hydrogen Station Market 16.2.1 Hydrogen Station Deployments 16.2.2 Hydrogen Stations Capacity 16.2.3 Hydrogen Station Costs 16.3 Asia - Pacific Hydrogen Station Market 16.3.1 Hydrogen Station Deployments 16.3.2 Hydrogen Stations Capacity 16.3.3 Hydrogen Station Costs 16.4 Europe, Middle East and Africa 16.4.1 Hydrogen Station Deployments 16.4.2 Hydrogen Station Capacity 16.4.3 Hydrogen Station Costs 16.5 Americas 16.5.1 Hydrogen Station Deployments 16.5.2 Hydrogen Station Capacity 16.5.3 Hydrogen Station Costs 17 Conclusions 17.1 Hydrogen as a
Fuel 17.2 Rollout
of Fuel Cell Vehicles 17.3 Hydrogen Station Deployments 17.4 Funding Requirements 17.5 Customer Experience 17.6 Other Findings
(B) The
Corporation is authorized to adjust the assessments on
fossil fuel - based electricity to reflect changes in the expected quantities
of such electricity from different
fuel types, such that the assessments generate not less than $ 1.0 billion and not more than $ 1.1 billion annually.
Initially most
of the funding for this disinformation campaign came from
fossil fuel interests and
corporations whose products produce high levels
of greenhouse gas emissions.
If the GCF is allowed to support projects that increase
fossil fuel dependency, prioritise the needs
of Wall Street and multinational
corporations, or harm people and ecosystems, it will be a huge blow to the world's newest, arguably most important climate fund.
I do see wrt to US laws, you are proposing confiscation and nationalization
of resources, since many
of the
fossil fuels are owned by individuals who have leased their mineral rights to
corporations.
As the head
of the Regulatory Unit at the Institute for Public Affairs, a right - wing think tank with close ties to greenhouse sceptics, Moran's role has been to support the Government and the
fossil fuel corporations with anti-environmental opinions about climate science, the costs
of emission reductions and the pitfalls
of renewable energy.
If
corporations in the
fossil fuel industry and their supporters are guilty
of the misdeeds that have been documented in books and journal articles, it is imperative that these misdeeds be stopped as soon as possible so that America and the world can get on with the critically important business
of finding effective ways to restabilize the Earth's climate, before even more lasting damage is done.
This could be seen as a tribute to the relative political power
of the
fossil fuel industries and high - consumers
of fossil energy (large
corporations and the affluent) versus the power
of the unemployed and youth; the former are treated, if at all, with gentle «nudges» while the latter are viewed as «clay to be molded» by elites.
We now know that for a decade the Howard Government's policies have been not so much influenced but actually written by a tiny cabal
of powerful
fossil fuel lobbyists representing the very
corporations whose commercial interests would be affected by any move to reduce Australia's burgeoning greenhouse gas emissions.
While equally necessary, closing existing
fossil fuel activity would be much harder and take longer, involving transition programs for workers and possible compensation claims from affected
corporations, and requiring rapid roll - out
of replacement renewable energy infrastructure.
10) «Leaders
of Large Organizations without a Low - / Zero - Carbon Strategy» — Besides electric utilities, much
fossil energy or electricity generated by combusting
fossil fuels is consumed by large
corporations, non-profit organizations, and departments / ministries
of various governments throughout the world.
His door is always open to the bosses
of big
fossil fuel corporations and closed to those representing renewables (except his ethanol - producing mate Dick Honan).
One
of the more important conduits between the
fossil fuel corporations and the think tanks is the Washington - based Atlas Economic Research Foundation.
But with
fossil fuel burning continuing at near record levels globally, and with many
corporations and political bodies around the world dragging feet on greenhouse gas emissions cuts, the level
of heat - trapping carbon held aloft in our airs will continue to rise for some time.
Senators Kaine, Sheldon Whitehouse (D - RI), and others have banded together to attack the alleged «web
of denial» that appears to be made up only
of conservative organizations that they claim are funded by ExxonMobil and other
fossil fuel corporations that they consider immoral — even though the energy they provide has been indispensable to lifting and keeping billions
of people out
of poverty, and even though ExxonMobil has not given any
of these groups a dime for a decade or more.
The Oakland - based company BrightSource Energy, which is overseeing construction by the Bechtel
corporation, says that using sunlight instead
of fossil fuels to power the turbines will reduce carbon emissions by more than 400,000 tons annually.
The idea is, if we allow oil and gas
corporations to exploit our land and water to extract
fossil fuels, it will benefit the average citizen by lowering energy prices and reducing dependence
of «foreign» energy supplies.