A separate study at Cornell University recently identified yet another mechanism increasing the risk of carrying contaminants from the path
of the fracking fluids into clean groundwater reservoirs: the same properties that make the fluids effective at fracking help fracking fluids dissolve contaminants like heavy metals that up until now have clung safely to soils in the form of colloids.
Investigating the Possible Effects
of Fracking Fluids on Earthquakes
Before production can commence, the well must be «completed» by removal
of the fracking fluids, which contain gas that can escape to the air.
The benefit of addressing public concern about the composition
of the fracking fluids «outweighs the restriction on company action, the cost of reporting, and any intellectual property value of proprietary chemicals.»
In 2011, in response to growing public concern about the possible environmental and human health effects of fracking wastewater, Pennsylvania's Department of Environmental Protection requested that the discharge
of fracking fluids and other unconventional oil and gas wastewater into surface waters be prohibited from central water - treatment facilities that release high salinity effluents.
Rozell said that the recycling
of fracking fluid is helping to reduce the amount of water produced by each natural gas well, but the fluid can usually only be reused once.
It can then be sucked back out as the natural gas is extracted from the reservoir, meaning that there is a virtually complete recovery
of the fracking fluid; water - based methods have roughly a 50 percent recovery rate.
During offshore fracking, a significant amount
of fracking fluid returns to the surface and is either discharged into the ocean or transported for onshore ground injection.
In the past two years alone, a series of surface spills, including two blowouts at wells operated by Chesapeake Energy and EOG Resources and a spill of 8000 gallons
of fracking fluid at a site in Dimock, Pa., have contaminated groundwater in the Marcellus Shale region.
During the fracking process, millions of gallons
of fracking fluid — a mixture of water, sand and toxic chemicals — are injected into the ground to break up the shale and release natural gas.
Some of the fracking fluid remains underground where it could potentially contaminate groundwater in the future, but much of it is brought back to the surface as wastewater.
Not exact matches
Further, the Duke study did not detect
fracking fluids in any
of the wells tested.
But perusing newspapers from towns where
fracking is going on reveals how the issue refuses to die, with headlines like «Fears of Tainted Water Well Up in Colorado,» «Collateral Damage: Residents Fear Murky Effects of Energy Boom,» and «Worker Believes Cancer Caused by Fracking Fluids» appearing re
fracking is going on reveals how the issue refuses to die, with headlines like «Fears
of Tainted Water Well Up in Colorado,» «Collateral Damage: Residents Fear Murky Effects
of Energy Boom,» and «Worker Believes Cancer Caused by
Fracking Fluids» appearing re
Fracking Fluids» appearing regularly.
Fleets
of trucks have to make hundreds
of trips to carry the
fracking fluid to and from each well site.
Though the
fluids were natural and not the byproduct
of drilling or hydraulic fracturing, the finding further stokes the red - hot controversy over
fracking in the Marcellus Shale, suggesting that drilling waste and chemicals could migrate in ways previously thought to be impossible.
If they survive, then it will be a good demonstration that
fracking is unlikely to harm New Yorkers, even if some
of the
fracking «
fluid» seeps into our underground aquifers.
State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli says Tuesday that Cabot has agreed to publicly disclose its policy and procedures for eliminating or minimizing the use
of toxic substances in
fracking fluids.
«It's absolutely unacceptable that the governor didn't prohibit all forms
of hydraulic
fluid fracking.»
They shared stories and fears
of water being contaminated by
fracking fluid; the political class reeled.
Moreover, scientists suspect that the injection
of used
fracking fluid into deep disposal wells may have triggered dozens
of recent small earthquakes in northeastern Ohio and north Texas.
As the gas comes up the well so does the
fracking fluid, along with volumes
of brine so salty it is hazardous.
«By measuring naturally occurring ammonium and iodide in numerous samples from different geological formations in the Appalachian Basin, including flowback waters from shale gas wells in the Marcellus and Fayetteville shale formations, we show that
fracking fluids are not much different from conventional oil and gas wastes,» said Jennifer S. Harkness, lead author
of the study and a PhD student at Duke's Nicholas School
of the Environment.
«It's not only
fracking fluids that pose a risk; produced water from conventional, or non-fracked, oil and gas wells also contains high levels
of radium, which is a radioactive element.
Previous studies have shown that
fracking fluids contain high levels
of salts, barium and radioactive elements, in addition to human - made chemicals added in the process
of hydraulic fracturing.
Both
fracking and wastewater injections can increase the
fluid pressure in the natural pores and fractures in rock, or change the state
of stress on existing faults, to produce earthquakes.
EPA officials have repeatedly said that disclosure
of the
fluids used in
fracking — something that would be required if the bill being debated in Congress were passed — would enable them to investigate contamination incidents faster, more conclusively and for less money.
The
fracking process uses high - pressure injections
of fluid to break apart rock and release trapped oil and natural gas.
California officials have ordered an emergency shut - down
of 11 oil and gas waste injection sites and a review more than 100 others in the state's drought - wracked Central Valley out
of fear that companies may have been pumping
fracking fluids and other toxic waste into drinking water aquifers there.
In the 121 - page draft report released today, EPA officials said that the contamination near the town
of Pavillion, Wyo., had most likely seeped up from gas wells and contained at least 10 compounds known to be used in
frack fluids.
Some
of the findings in the report also directly contradict longstanding arguments by the drilling industry for why the
fracking process is safe: that hydrologic pressure would naturally force
fluids down, not up; that deep geologic layers provide a watertight barrier preventing the movement
of chemicals towards the surface; and that the problems with the cement and steel barriers around gas wells aren't connected to
fracking.
The upshot is a growing — albeit incomplete — list
of preferred chemicals that companies such as Apache can choose from as they design their
fracking fluids.
Most
of the drill sites flooded had already been
fracked, and were actively producing oil or gas — so chemicals added to
fracking fluids should not have been on site.
Then, in 2011, a congressional investigation found that in fact between 2005 and 2009, 12 companies had injected 32 million gallons
of diesel fuel or
fracking fluids containing diesel fuel in wells in 19 states.
Investigations by The New York Times last winter revealed that sewage - treatment plants processing
fracking wastewater are discharging radioactive
fluid into public waterways, in some cases upstream
of intake sites for drinking water.
A range
of hydrocarbons showed up in the deep wells, as did some synthetic organic chemicals associated with
fracking fluids and drilling activities.
But according to a panel
of geologists at the AAAS Annual Meeting, the culprit isn't hydraulic fracturing, or «
fracking,» in which geologists crack open subsurface rocks to extract oil and gas; instead, it's the processes associated with pumping wastewater and other
fluids back into the ground.
Fracking has already drawn considerable scrutiny from environmental groups, unhappy homeowners, and teams
of lawyers who blame the drilling method for polluting pristine rivers, turning bucolic farmlands into noisy industrial zones, and leaking enough methane to make ordinary tap water as flammable as lighter
fluid.
Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) has a number
of advantages over the chemical - laced water typically used as a
fracking fluid.
Afterwards, companies need to pump out the
fracking fluids, releasing bubbles
of dissolved gas as well as burps
of early gas production.
A bill now under consideration on Capitol Hill would grant the EPA oversight
of fracking and force drilling companies, which are currently exempt from portions
of the Clean Water Act, to disclose the chemicals they use in fracturing
fluids.
The risk
of human - made earthquakes due to
fracking is greatly reduced if high - pressure
fluid injection used to crack underground rocks is 895m away from faults in the Earth's crust, according to new research.
In the future, they say, drillers should take account
of such risks, especially when they fail to recover
fracking fluids.
Research lead author Miles Wilson, a PhD student in Durham University's Department
of Earth Sciences, said: «Induced earthquakes can sometimes occur if
fracking fluids reach geological faults.
Typically,
fracking involves injections into impermeable rock layers that inhibit the spread
of fluid and increase pore pressure.
They looked both at wells used for enhanced oil recovery — in which
fluid is injected to flush lingering oil from a depleted reservoir — and at those used to dispose
of wastewater from conventional oil and gas extraction or from hydraulic fracturing (
fracking).
Their discovery could aid secure
fracking — in which rocks below ground are split with high - pressure
fluids — or extraction
of methane gas from deep coal beds.
Hydraulic fracturing, or
fracking, is a method
of hydrocarbon recovery that uses high - pressure injections
of fluid to break apart rock and release trapped oil and natural gas.
The report explains that along with natural gas, production wells in the Azle area
of the NEGF can also bring to the surface significant volumes
of water from the highly permeable Ellenburger Formation — both naturally occurring brine as well as
fluids that were introduced during the
fracking process.
Scientists don't know all
of the hormone - like chemicals in
fracking fluid yet, Linden notes.
And that is an underestimate
of the amount
of brine,
fracking fluid and other contaminated water that flows back up a well along with the natural gas or oil, because it is based on incomplete data from state governments gathered in 2007.