If only the next generation
of game reviewers would also take this to heart.
This site is not part of Metacritic's list
of game reviewers though.
With an ever - increasing amount
of game reviewers out there it's hard to pick out many of them amongst the giants such as IGN and Gamespot who dominate the net.
But in this day and age, many game sales can hinder on the word
of game reviewers.
The wisdom
of games reviewers is best given in small doses... This is essentially a «training» game wrapped in a ninja theme, designed to improve your... [Read full story]
Not exact matches
Some
reviewers have called Zelda the best installment
of the
game franchise since the 1990s hit The Legend
of Zelda: Ocarina
of Time.
The website, one
of the biggest
games reviewers online, gave Gears 3 nine out
of 10.
By giving Gears
of War 3 such a high average score,
reviewers are setting the bar low for what a great
game should be and are doing a disservice to an industry that is struggling to be taken seriously by the mainstream.
Many
reviewers agree with Bainbridge and Eldredge, dismissing Spore's Cell stage as a clone
of the 1980s arcade
game Pac - Man.
Although Bainbridge hated Spore as a
game more than any
of the other
reviewers, he gave better marks for its science.
The
reviewers based it off the Alpha / Beta state
of the
game during early access, the
game has changed
I tend to review KOEI titles higher than some other
reviewers as I have no interest in panning a
game that people have put some effort into; on the surface this is not one
of those
games.
The
reviewers based it off the Alpha / Beta state
of the
game during early access, the
game has changed drastically since then.
Most
of the
reviewers didn't play this
game for long.
A lot
of reviewers underating the wii
games just because is a less powerful console, but I think this is not fair.
is one
of the best
games that this
reviewer has played on the iPhone and iPad, offering a plethora
of options and an excellent story.
This
reviewer couldn't help thinking
of the realization brought back by recent family
games of Monopoly: the oversold «fun» sure does tend to drag.
Reviewers as a group find the HD graphics equal to those
of the PS3 and Xbox 360, but don't expect visuals superior to those competitors; as Ars Technica writes, «If the Wii U is capable
of generating graphics more detailed than those
of other current systems, the launch
games I've seen so far don't do a great job showing that off.»
Reviewers are finding no compelling reason to purchase the Xbox - style «Pro» controller at the moment, especially given that controller's lack
of motion controls and incompatibility with many
games.
Don't belelive in hype and don't belelive in what all
of those so called
game reviewers say.
Reviewers are both blown away and frustrated by the GamePad controller, depending on how it is implemented in any particular
game, and are also somewhat pessimistic about the console's chances for widespread success — and the ability
of Nintendo to attract third - party developers — despite the nifty new features.
This is one
of those few times when the
game reviewers get it wrong, and this is one
of those times.
As
of my writing this the
game already has a patch applied that was not present for previous
reviewers.
Then all
of a sudden, kids don't want to say they don't like it, because their friends will tell them «git gud», and
game reviewers who typically play all
games at easy don't want to say those
games suck to not lose their «reputation» as
gamers (that is, unless they are bribed).
Most
reviewers are treating this
game as it should have been a sequel to the amazing black flag, like it should have gone beyond the scope
of
Thank you for being one
of the few
reviewers who understood the brilliance
of the early
games as well as the reason why the film fell so short.
In the end and after many more
games I can say that the assessment
of this
game by other
reviewers just seems wrong.
While I didn't hate this
game as much as some
of the
reviewers did (I think IGN's 1.5 may be a little harsh), it is definitely far from a good
game.
I won't bother going into the plethora
of bugs and glitches that infect this
game, because they've already been documented many many times by other more notable
reviewers.
Animal Crossing New Leaf is a pretty long
game and it takes weeks to begin to unlock all the fun, so Nintendo wanted to make sure
reviewers got a good grasp
of the
game so they can give it a fair reviews.
The general public will have their hands on Super Mario Maker within just a few weeks, but for now you'll have to live with checking out some
of the unique features that
reviewers and previewers are revealing about the
game on YouTube.
The
reviewers cut to the bone: «Animal Crossing: Amiibo Festival is the sort
of game that should have been free.
In this
reviewer's case, as much as I admired the films level
of craft — an artful artlessness if that's possible — there was a certain urgency or energy lacking in Fair
Game that was hard to put my finger on.
As
games go for the early 90s, this was a bloody good
game that may not have survived the test
of time, but still tugs at the nostalgic heartstrings
of this
reviewer.
Many fans and «professional»
reviewers alike have gained a good amount
of expectations in regards to what the
game could possibly give to them after a 4 year long hiatus.
not the greatest
game ever, has its flaws and shortcomings, but i still found it pretty fun and enjoyable, unlike a lot
of the
reviewers who found a few flaws and decided to say it's an awful
game, when it's not.
It saddens me that this
game was so underappreciated: either the
reviewers were expecting another combat - heavy gorefest like God
of War, or they couldn't really get immersed into the
game.
not the greatest
game ever, has its flaws and shortcomings, but i still found it pretty fun and enjoyable, unlike a lot
of the
reviewers who
We scored it a 90 out
of 100 and our
reviewer for the
game, Michael Chow, praised the
game for its beautiful graphics and entertaining characters.
It reminds me
of when the Xbox 360 was getting all the JRPG
games (took the PS3 some time to get going), and the
reviewers kept giving all the
games bad scores.
In my opinion, the perfect example
of a
game that very few
reviewers fully understood before writing about it is Vandal Hearts II.
Reviewers weren't all that enthusiastic either, knocking the
game for its basic platforming action and the way developers had gated off a number
of bonus stages.
As Kotaku's resident LEGO fan and
game reviewer I approached LEGO Harry Potter: Years 1 - 4 with more than a bit
of trepidation.
The Evil Within Format — Playstation 4
Game Genre — Survival Horror Rating — R18 +
Game Developer — Tango Gameworks
Game Publisher — Bethesda Softworks Release Date — 16th
of October 2014
Reviewer — Andrew Bistak
[Laughs] A lot
of reviewers has said the
game's been able to expand upon the series and move it forward.
The integrity
of in -
game mechanics are polished and hold up to the scrutiny we 2016 - based
reviewers can place upon them.
Miketendo64: «When SteamWorld Heist released on 3DS last year,
reviewers spoke very highly
of the
game and fan reaction was quite positive.
Vast majority
of reviewers claim the
game is oozing with creative charm, and praise it as one
of the defining features
of the
game.
Definitely seems like one
of those
games where most
reviewers didn't put the effort in to actually learn the intricacies
of its gameplay so they complain about difficulty spikes, etc..
After making some lofty claims that Velocity 2X would be «a
game -
of - the - year winner» when it launches in early September on PlayStation 4 and PlayStation Vita, developer FuturLab posted a ton
of tweets last night about their upcoming
game, including how they will be surprised if a
reviewers gives 2X less than a 7/10: