Sentences with phrase «of glacial isostatic adjustment»

Observation of glacial isostatic adjustment in «stable» North America with GPS.
They also point out that the choice of glacial isostatic adjustment datasets make a difference in the estimates and that better estimates are needed, especially in the Arctic and Antarctic.
Box also seems not to be aware of glacial isostatic adjustment and the illusion of ice loss in Greenland and the Antarctic.
These highstands imply an ongoing and moderate, sub - mm / yr, sea - level fall in the far field of the Late Pleistocene ice cover that has long been linked to the process of glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA; Clark et al., 1978).
Both are as a result of glacial isostatic adjustment, the ongoing movement of land once burdened by ice - age glaciers.
But as you have just pointed out, the signal of glacial isostatic adjustment is now smaller than the signal derived from GRACE.
«Palaeoshoreline records of glacial isostatic adjustment in the Dry Valleys region, Antarctica.»
Konfal, S. A., Wilson, T. J., Bevis, M. G., Kendrick, E. C., Dalziel, I. W., Smalley, R., Willis, M. J., Heeszel, D. S., Wiens, D. A., (2013), GPS observations of glacial isostatic adjustment into the Antarctic Interior, Abstract G43B - 0981 presented at 2013 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, Calif., 9 - 13 Dec..

Not exact matches

«Data from GPS measurements and carbon dating of marsh sediments indicate that regional land subsidence in response to glacial isostatic adjustment in the southern Chesapeake Bay region may have a current rate of about 1 mm / yr (Engelhart and others, 2009; Engelhart and Horton, 2012).
Our physical patterns are based on the physics of glacier / ice sheet melt (static equioibrium fingerprints), glacial isostatic adjustment models, and an ensemble of GCMs to inform the ocean dynamic contribution.
Vertical land movements such as resulting from glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA), tectonics, subsidence and sedimentation influence local sea level measurements but do not alter ocean water volume; nonetheless, they affect global mean sea level through their alteration of the shape and hence the volume of the ocean basins containing the water.
You really need to look at multi-decadal time periods to determine trends, as in Church and White 2011 who found «1900 to 2009 is 1.7 ± 0.2 mm / year and since 1961 is 1.9 ± 0.4 mm / year» and «For 1993 — 2009 and after correcting for glacial isostatic adjustment, the estimated rate of rise is 3.2 ± 0.4 mm / year from the satellite data and 2.8 ± 0.8 mm / year from the in situ data».
Gravity measurements of the ice - mass loss in Greenland and Antarctica are complicated by glacial isostatic adjustment.
Some groups have tried to develop models of the rebounding land, so that sea level researchers can apply «Glacial Isostatic Adjustments» (GIA) to their data to correct for the effects.
Furthermore due to glacial isostatic adjustments, 3 to 4 inches of that relative sea level rise is due to land subsidence on the eastern seaboard.
Finally, they believe that an adjustment of +0.3 mm / yr is necessary to account for Peltier's Glacial Isostatic Adjustments (see Section 4).
Additionally, unadjusted GRACE gravity data has suggested no lost ice mass and all estimates of ice gains or loss depend on which Glacial Isostatic Adjustments modelers choose to use.
GIA, or glacial isostatic adjustment is just starting to get a run in respect of the alleged glacier declines; there are lots or papers out there if one cares to google GIA.
We suggest that the resolution of this issue is consistent with our estimate of the approximately +7 m Holsteinian global sea level, and is provided by Raymo & Mitrovica [58], who pointed out the need to make a glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) correction for post-glacial crustal subsidence at the places where Hearty and others deduced local sea - level change.
I'm at a loss to understand you you missed that glacial isostatic adjustments, groundwater removal, silt deposition, and seismic events could influence your tidal gauge graphs and that you needed to rule out those land effects before you could draw the kind of conclusions you are.
Glacial isostatic adjustment, why we have glacial and interglacial periods, how we can reconstruct climate history, and how the Earth is responding to the retreat of the continental glGlacial isostatic adjustment, why we have glacial and interglacial periods, how we can reconstruct climate history, and how the Earth is responding to the retreat of the continental glglacial and interglacial periods, how we can reconstruct climate history, and how the Earth is responding to the retreat of the continental glaciers.
A deglacial model for Antarctica: geological constraints and glaciological modelling as a basis for a new model of Antarctic glacial isostatic adjustment.
Our comparison of the GPS data to models for glacial isostatic adjustment suggests that some parts of western coastal Greenland were experiencing accelerated melting of coastal ice by the late 1990s.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z