And the long - term rise in the
costs of global disasters is probably due mainly to socio - economic changes, such as population growth and development in vulnerable regions.
Likewise, the politician can figure the risk
of a global disaster by multiplying the chance of its occurrence by its potential costs.
When they are hit, they end up crashing on to a dangerous and quarantined planet that is revealed to be Earth 1000 years after mankind was evacuated following a
set of global disasters.
As a result of these challenges, the office has launched an online tool called the Sendai Framework Monitor, named after the global agreement to tackle the
impacts of global disasters by 2030.
Some climatologists like to claim this discrepancy is not sufficient to invalidate their theories and models, but the recent proliferation of papers trying to explain it demonstrates this plateau is a serious challenge to the
claims of global disaster.
By «a theory that didn't suit the people who follow this site» you must be referring to the Alarmists» idea that our C02 is causing all
manner of global disasters, and will, if not curtailed lead to global catastrophe, meaning we must immediately change our sources of energy to far more expensive ones, costing trillions.