Not exact matches
Global security, instead, has five dimensions that include human, environmental, national, transnational, and transcultural security, and, therefore, global security and the security of any state or culture can not be achieved without good governance at all levels that guarantees security through justice for all individuals, states, and cultures.&
Global security, instead, has five dimensions that include human, environmental, national, transnational, and transcultural security, and, therefore,
global security and the security of any state or culture can not be achieved without good governance at all levels that guarantees security through justice for all individuals, states, and cultures.&
global security and the security
of any state or culture can not be achieved
without good
governance at all levels that guarantees security through justice for all individuals, states, and cultures.»
Without good
governance and a focus on protecting intact natural forests rather than the forest industry, any climate agreement has little chance
of addressing the nearly 20 percent
of global greenhouse gas emissions that stem from the destruction
of tropical forests.
Luncheon Lecture «Careless Opening Up
of Countries (
without Keeping the Anchor
of the Nation - state) Leads either to Anarchy or to
Global Governance: The Lessons
of the European Experience» by Vaclav Klaus
In no particular order, there are the Leftist economists for whom
global warming represents a supreme example
of market failure (as well as a wonderful opportunity to suggest correctives), UN apparatchiks for whom
global warming is the route to
global governance, Third world dictators who see guilt over
global warming as providing a convenient claim on aid (ie, the transfer
of wealth from the poor in rich countries to the wealthy in poor countries), Environmental activists who love any issue that has the capacity to frighten the gullible into making hefty contributions to their numerous NGOs, Crony capitalists who see the immense sums being made available for «sustainable» energy, Government regulators for whom the control
of a natural product
of breathing is a dream come true, Newly minted billionaires who find the issue
of «saving the planet» appropriately suitable to their grandiose pretensions, Politicians who can fasten on to CAGW as a signature issue where they can act as demagogues
without fear
of contradiction from reality or complaint from the purported beneficiaries
of their actions.