Sentences with phrase «of global warming policy»

Benny Peiser, director of the Global Warming Policy Foundation, said the slowdown was a far larger issue than the report shows.

Victor argues that a radical rethinking of global warming policy is required and shows how to make international law on global warming more effective.

CBS Evening News gave the head of the Global Warming Policy Foundation, Benny Peiser — who CBS described as one of the «skeptics» — equal weight as a climate scientist, without noting that Peiser has no expertise in climate science in a segment titled «Globe not warming as previously thought.»

Also he quotes David Whitehouse of the Global Warming Policy Foundation saying that the Met Office «thinks weather forecasting is beneath it» and that «climate change... brings in more money».

Dr Benny Peiser, of the Global Warming Policy Foundation, described the leaked report as a «staggering concoction of confusion, speculation and sheer ignorance».

«Meanwhile, according to an analysis yesterday by David Whitehouse of the Global Warming Policy Foundation, 2010 had only two unusually warm months, March and April, when El Niño was at its peak.»

Peiser is director of the Global Warming Policy Foundation, was the founder of the Cambridge Conference Network, and is a member of the editorial advisory board of Energy and Environment.

Benny Peiser is a social anthropologist and director of Global Warming Policy Foundation in the UK.

Ridley was listed as a writer / endorser of a Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) briefing paper titled «The Small Print: What the Royal Society Left Out «that accused the Royal Society of «presenting a misleading picture of climate science.»

Members of the Scientific Council of the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) recently criticized the Royal Society's positions on climate.

Meanwhile, according to an analysis yesterday by David Whitehouse of the Global Warming Policy Foundation, 2010 had only two unusually warm months, March and April, when El Nino was at its peak.

Benny Peiser, social anthropologist at Liverpool's John Moores University, is director of the Global Warming Policy Foundation, who was concerned about the hysterical nature of climate change rhetoric

Happer was listed as a writer / endorser of a Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) briefing paper titled «The Small Print: What the Royal Society Left Out «that accused the Royal Society of «presenting a misleading picture of climate science.»

In a letter to the Radio Times, Nigel Lawson of the Global Warming Policy Foundation rebutted many of the series» claims, including the one about the polar bear population falling.

Why does it matter in the context of global warming policy if computer models can not definitively explain the distant past?

Essex was listed as a writer / endorser of a Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) briefing paper titled «The Small Print: What the Royal Society Left Out «that accused the Royal Society of «presenting a misleading picture of climate science.»

Dr. Benny Peiser of Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) reports (January 10, 2011) that Liverpool MP Louise Ellman, chairman of the Transport Select committee, is angling to be appointed to head such an official parliamentary probe.

You asked: Why does it matter in the context of global warming policy if computer models can not definitively explain the distant past?

This explains inclusion of a Global Warming policy advocate like Boulton, to defend claims about the general validity of «mainstream» IPCC science.

Carter was listed as a writer / endorser of a Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) briefing paper titled «The Small Print: What the Royal Society Left Out «that accused the Royal Society of «presenting a misleading picture of climate science.»

As I mentioned yesterday, the Swedish scientist Lennart Bengtsson, former director of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, winner of the 2005 Descartes Research Prize and the 2006 World Meteorological Organization IMO Prize and a man whose contributions to science far outweigh Michael Mann's, recently revealed that he was joining the advisory board of the Global Warming Policy Foundation, a think - tank for rational skepticism founded in London by Nigel Lawson.

The proponents of global warming policy always seem to lose whenever they encounter a fair forum where both sides receive equal time.

The man who would like more than anyone to know the answer to this question is David Whitehouse, Science Editor of the Global Warming Policy Foundation and a former science editor at the BBC (till the point when his skepticism became too much for his employer).

Of course, this is not to suggest that Stringer was completely uninterested in possible «malpractice», as this earlier exchange with Lord Lawson of the Global Warming Policy Foundation demonstrated:

Bob Carter of James Cook University in Australia wrote an article in 2006 saying that there had been no global warming since 1998 according to the most widely used measure of average global air temperatures... [and] David Whitehouse of the Global Warming Policy Foundation in London made the same point... Mark Lynas said in the New Statesman that Mr. Whitehouse was «wrong... We know now that it was Mr. Lynas who was wrong.

September, 2010 When the three British Government enquiries into the CRU emails were completed, Dr Benny Peiser of the Global Warming Policy Foundation immediately announced that he wanted to investigate further.

The reason for the formation of the Global Warming Policy Forum as a seperate entity can be traced to a report by the UK Charity Commision (PDF) that looked into the Global Warming Policy Foundation when «Concerns were raised with the commission that the charity was promoting views that were of a political rather than an educational nature.»

Advocates of global warming policy have to be simultaneously successful in all four major public arenas to prevail.

Some insights into the public pressure on those that are skeptical of consensus climate change science or the UNFCCC policies are provided by a recent iaiTV interview of Benny Peiser, Director of the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF).

Lindzen was listed as a writer / endorser of a Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) briefing paper titled «The Small Print: What the Royal Society Left Out «that accused the Royal Society of «presenting a misleading picture of climate science.»

Ross McKitrick is a senior fellow at the Exxon funded Fraser institute and on the academic advisory board of the Global Warming Policy Foundation.

In addition to his position at Cato, Lindzen is listed as an «Expert» the Heartland Institute, a member of the «Academic Advisory Council» of the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), and an advisor to the CO2 Coalition, a group promoting the benefits of atmospheric carbon dioxide.

Source note The links marked by an asterisk come courtesy of an e-mail newsletter from Benny Peiser of the Global Warming Policy Foundation.

Even if you reject the policy prescriptions or science interpretations of the Global Warming Policy Forum, the director, Benny Peiser, is an energetic aggregator of climate coverage that you might otherwise miss.

Benny Peiser, director of the Global Warming Policy Foundation, said, «Science lives and dies with the issue of testability, replication, verification, falsification.»

«In praise of the Global Warming Policy Foundation Main Lord Lawson and Lord Turnbull respond to Chris Huhne's pro-global warming assertions»

(Here's also a useful primer on costs of global warming policies.)

That would be 0.9 degrees Celsius below the amount of warming that Climate Action Tracker projects to occur under current policies, and 1.4 to 2.1 degrees Celsius below the amount of warming the group predicts would occur in the absence of any global warming policies.

Not exact matches

Under current policies, the IEA puts the chances of holding global temperature increases to less than 2 degrees — the threshold at which global warming tips us into the danger zone — at a scant 2 percent.

There are known connections and movements of people involved in government policy, scientific societies, and private industry, all with the common thread of influencing the outcome of a set of programs and investments underpinned by the supposed threat of global warming.

When we ask what policy to adopt in view of global warming, economists are inclined to advise us not to make any costly changes.

But the advice given by leading economists to the United States government has been to emphasize policies that lead to economic growth so that we will be in position to pay the costs of global warming as they arise.

On Thursday, Ruch's watchdog group plans to file a complaint with the agency on Monnett's behalf, asserting that Obama administration officials have «actively persecuted» him in violation of policy intended to protect scientists from political interference... In May 2008, the U.S. classified the polar bear as a threatened species, the first with its survival at risk due to global warming.

Also speaking at the event — Global Warming and Food Policy: Less Meat = Less Heat — held in the iconic Hemicycle in the Brussels Parliament, will be Dr Rajendra K. Pachauri, chairman of the nobel - prize - winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and Olivier de Schutter, the UN Special Rapporteur for the right to food.

The plan establishes a set of six fundamental principles for the region, which include: transportation and other infrastructure upgrades; new commercial and residential growth; land use and transportation decisions based on policies like the Global Warming Solutions Act and the Clean Energy and Climate Plan; creation and preservation of workforce housing that matches new job rates; creation and maintenance of an effective public transit system; and coordinated planning and implementation efforts.

Trump is poised in the coming days to announce his plans to dismantle the centerpiece of former President Barack Obama's climate change legacy, while also gutting several smaller but significant policies aimed at curbing global warming.

In other policy areas - eg on attitudes to the United Nations and global warming, David Miliband is clearly a man of the Left.

«I am a Democrat and disagree with virtually all of President Trump's policy positions including those on healthcare, LGBTQ rights, civil rights, immigration, global warming, gun control, and tax «reform.

Is the right policy for global warming to seek an 80 % emissions reduction by 2050, or to transition completely out of fossil fuels?

07/26/2011 in Adam Smith Institute, Centre for Policy Studies, Centre for Social Justice, Civitas, Global Warming Policy Forum, Institute of Economic Affairs, Policy Exchange, Taxpayers Alliance Permalink