Likewise «theology» as doctrine
of God exists as a branch of theology as I have defined it.
Because
of god exists it is part of our reality.
Why do you keep bringing up failed experiments and flwed science to try to bolster your belief in the extremely improbable tiniest slight of a possiblity that your version
of a god exists.
He pretends he can «prove» that his version
of god exists and is the only «true» god, when he can do nothing of the sort, and demeans his own faith by presenting it as fact.
Then it can be recognized that the need and suffering of the world are the sinner's need and suffering, and so do not stand in contradiction to the providence of God, and that the right to affirm the providence
of God exists only for him to whom the God of the present is at the same time God of the future.
Peterson would probably admit that this statement is an overly dialectical way of expressing the simpler truth that «a real speaking
of God exists meaningfully only with Christ.»
For us there is no cause of Jesus; only the cause
of God exists for us.
Could our inside relatives really be where the Kingdom
of God exists?
FAITH Magazine March — April 2011 From Pope Benedict's Epiphany Homily 6th Jan 2011» [The Magi] were people certain that something we might describe as the «signature»
of God exists in...
If the Christian concept
of God exist he has to be repulsed by this attempt of humor.
I have reviewed all the actual evidence for the existence of any god that has been presented to me or that I have found and have formed the opinion, based on the available actual evidence, that the probability
of any god existing is very small.
I just meant that as the term married bachelors is contradictory, so is the idea
of God existing contingently.
So, what are the chances that the majority of humans on this planet will ever agree that all religions are man - made and that none
of the gods exist?
Unless one of you believers has some factual, independent and verifiable evidence of any god, given that such evidence does not exist even after 2,000 + years of various cults trying to come up with same, the probability
of any god existing is so small that to say «There are no gods!»
I bear no burden of proof, for I am denying YOUR claim
of a god existing.
The pictures of him too, those are funny, because he's standing there claiming God isn't there, trying to rally people, and when it comes right down to it, he's simply ignorant
of God existing, and doesn't know it.
Whether that God is scientifically provable or even consistently defined is not as relevant as the fact
of God existing in that social context.
Mark, when making such extraordinary claims
of God existing, you need to provide proof.
Rosemary Ruether in an essay on Judaism and Christianity tells us that «far from despising sexuality, the rabbis even declared that, since the destruction of the temple, the presence
of God existed in two places: in the rabbinic houses of study, and when a man lies beside his wife.»
It is an expression of the absence of a viewpoint on a particular question, namely: «does any kind
of god exist?».
I know that none
of these gods exist and in regards to each of these religions, there is no god.
In the first stage only the being
of God existed and nothing had been created; the seventh and last stage is the sphere of man, or the sphere of the perfect man.
Without a battalion of secretaries to gather all the things I could bring together as a body of evidence, I am cast upon the shores of typing arguments on the internet trying to point at enough solid facts that directly correlate to the definite impossibility
of any god existing as gods are defined.
Not exact matches
It's a religion, inspiring the sort
of emotion usually reserved for debates over whether or not
God exists.
Even if you believe
God is vanishingly unlikely to
exist, the consequence
of being wrong (Hell) is so great, and the benefits
of being right (not having to go to church on Sundays) so comparatively miniscule, that you should probably just believe in
God to be on the safe side.
At the minimum the
God of Spinoza
exists in and behind the curtain and he has proof which even Einstein found to have merit.
Live, because deciding for or against it was obviously relevant and important; forced, because one either accepted Christianity or refused it — there was no getting out
of the decision; and momentous, because, on the chance that
God does
exist, the decision would have eternal ramifications.
There is no way to know which
god to choose, because there is no evidence whatever indicating that any
of them
exist.
00:00 Introduction 07:07 Limits
of Science 19:40
God & the Supernatural 31:20 Science & Morality 50:11 Something out
of Nothing 1:03:42 The Value
of Philosophy 1:20:59 Cognitive Limits 1:35:43 Questions: — 1:35:56 Science & Politics — 1:43:33 The Status
of Economics — 1:48:17 Does Consciousness
Exist?
If godliness is defined as the state
of having freed one's soul from karmas and the attainment
of enlightenment and a
God as one who
exists in such a state, then those who have achieved such a state can be termed
gods.
Humans have worshiped literally thousands
of gods throughout history, and ever true believer
of every one
of those
gods felt the same conviction that you do, despite the fact that there isn't a single shred
of evidence that any
of those
gods (even yours) actually
exists.
If a species, especially an advanced one, had similar stories to ours and also insisted on a
god similar to that
of the bible, could that be construed as some evidence that a
god exists and that its the one from the bible?
It's difficult to argue that the humble rabbi from the Galilee didn't
exist, but it's incredibly easy to argue that there is no evidence that he was a son
of any
god, actually performed miracles, or that much
of his legend isn't based upon prior myths
of dying and rising hero /
gods.
And given
God existing billions
of years, which includes over all human history, that
God interacting with others and them not being in the bible, they're the same, liars, lunatics, or dreaming... just so you can reject
God and feel good about that choice.
The proof your
god doesn't
exist the millions, upon millions, upon millions
of unanswered prayer s that happen every day.
But the most amazing thing
of all is how some people interpret this very human knowledge as proof that their
god exists.
fortunately it did not get out
of hand because
God pressed the detenator and everything in heaven came to
exist.
Answer that Steven Hawking.Cannot be done.My guess is if their is a
God then
God would be all that
exists on the other side
of the universe, except what
God created there.We can not prove what is over there, so guess we will just have to wait until we die.
However, basing the response to «where did
God come from» to avoid the inherent premise that everything that exists must have a cause (with or without W.L. Craig's superfluous inclusion of «begins to exist») on the definitional fiat that «god always existed» is simply special pleadi
God come from» to avoid the inherent premise that everything that
exists must have a cause (with or without W.L. Craig's superfluous inclusion
of «begins to
exist») on the definitional fiat that «
god always existed» is simply special pleadi
god always
existed» is simply special pleading.
It's because in their heart
of hearts, they do know that the biblical
God exists.
Using the Bible as proof that
God exists is like using a 6 - year - old's drawing
of a unicorn to prove that unicorns
exist.
Agnostics believe the existence
of God can not be proven, but Atheism is a belief that centers itself upon the non-existence
of a deity — and calls into question the multiple guides
of morality, and spirituality that
exist to support that belief.
And as there is a dramatic lack
of proof that
God exists I can not prove to you that he does.
Of course, not being able to prove in the existence of God doesn't negate the possibility God exist
Of course, not being able to prove in the existence
of God doesn't negate the possibility God exist
of God doesn't negate the possibility
God exists.
Of course they don't have any of the joys of a relationship with God, how can they, because for them, God doesn't exist, and it is so much fun to make fun of believers, I mean, they just roll with laughte
Of course they don't have any
of the joys of a relationship with God, how can they, because for them, God doesn't exist, and it is so much fun to make fun of believers, I mean, they just roll with laughte
of the joys
of a relationship with God, how can they, because for them, God doesn't exist, and it is so much fun to make fun of believers, I mean, they just roll with laughte
of a relationship with
God, how can they, because for them,
God doesn't
exist, and it is so much fun to make fun
of believers, I mean, they just roll with laughte
of believers, I mean, they just roll with laughter.
John, I have not mentioned any
god of evolution as I do not believe any
god exists.
Most
of what I see is «prove» your
God exists.
if the first pair would nothave sinned they would still be here and all human kind would know is the ways
of almighty
God and
existing on a paradise earth — wich still is comming.the reason he didn't destroy Satan immediately is because he posed a Question as to almighty
Gods right to sovereignty..
You said, «So you seem to be saying that «Random chance is a better explanation that the existence
of God if
God doesn't
exist.»
Like I've mentioned a whole lot
of times now, I'm an atheist,
god or
gods most likely don't
exist in any way, shape or form however if presented with em.p.ir.ac.le evidence to the contrary that is repeatable and believable I'd be willing to change my stance on the matter.