Sentences with phrase «of good arguments for it»

There were plenty of good arguments for not interfering in Syria last week, including the lack of a publicly - presented plan, the potential for escalation in the event of inadvertent hits on Russian personnel, and the character flaws of the US president, which make any military initiative unpredictable.

I think there are plenty of good arguments for bad 1st round draft picks, I just don't think these guys are in there.

To me, one of the best arguments for going this route is that I would like to see my books published in my lifetime!

One of the best arguments for the inherent value of historical legal materials is the philosophy of «originalism» as espoused by Justice Scalia and Justice Thomas of the US Supreme Court.

These are just some of the best arguments for Android apps on Chromebooks in my opinion.

Not exact matches

Beyond the two games competing for players, devotees of each are debating which is the better game, and the number one argument is related to skill.

All of which sounds like a good argument for staying away from negativity to protect your mental health, but Parton insists that quitting the complaining habit is essential for your physical health, too.

As Eddie Nuvakhov, CEO and producer of LNC Productions, a company that specializes in marketing videos explains, «You need to show people how your product is going to change their lives for the better, and not just what the product is, if you want to make a convincing argument for its purchase.

Although both appellants and the government argue that the ACA, read in its totality, evinces clear congressional intent, they dispute what that intent actually is... We conclude that the appellants have the better of the argument: a federal Exchange is not an «Exchange established by the State,» and section 36B does not authorize the IRS to provide tax credits for insurance purchased on federal Exchanges.

As well - outfitted as this tablet might be, it is unclear if the company can make an argument for the cost of such a tool.

To seek out the counterweights to this argument, Cramer zoomed in on the 10 best performing tech stocks in the S&P 500 for the first half of 2017 — gaming giants Activision Blizzard and Electronic Arts, software players Adobe Systems, Red Hat and Autodesk, semiconductor - related companies Micron, Nvidia and Lam Research, payment provider PayPal and the Apple - involved Broadcom.

«There would be valid accounting arguments for the costs of relinquishing that «right» as well.

The worry is that businesses exposed to such arguments will come to think of ethics from a purely instrumental point of view: we'll act ethically only because, and only to the extent, that it's good for profits.

Even if we were to agree (even for sake of argument) that a Board of Directors» main obligation is to serve the interests of the organization and its shareholders, that still leaves open this important question: should a Board of Directors seek the best outcomes for the organization and its shareholders, or should it seek justice for it and for them?

If Trump wants to argue that U.S. - Mexico trade relations have been lousy for the better part of three decades, then that's an argument he's free to make.

The former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti scrutinized Schwartz's argument after the CNN segment aired, tweeting that the attorney's suggestion that Trump was unaware of the agreement could actually be good news for Daniels.

For the sake of argument, though, let's suppose that your team actually does have a need for better communicatiFor the sake of argument, though, let's suppose that your team actually does have a need for better communicatifor better communication.

The argument in favour of the CWB is that its monopsony status gives it the market power to obtain better prices for farmers.

I'll leave it for others to judge the merits of this argument, but assuming it gains traction with regulators and policymakers — it was aired recently in Congressional hearings over Keystone XL — it could actually be a good thing, long term, for Canada.

This is because, even if you have a heated argument, as long as you keep in the back of your mind that the people you're arguing with do have the best in mind for the company and wider team, you'll always be able to make it to the end and remain friendly.

Anyway, if you work in one of the few organizations that haven't yet been bitten by this egregiously awful management fad, here are 16 solid arguments why private offices, working from home, and even cubicles are better for business than these glorified hotel lobbies.

She recommends approaching activists and their arguments with openness and considering it in the context of what's best for shareholders.

But there's a pretty good argument that payments on Argentina's euro - denominated bonds never flow through the judge's jurisdiction: Argentina gives the money to a bank in Buenos Aires, which transfers it to a bank in Frankfurt, which holds it in the name of a bank in Brussels, which transfers it to a London nominee for Belgian and Luxembourg clearinghouses, which pays it to bondholders.

The «bank for central banks» has released a paper on the possible impact of state - issued cryptocurrencies, as well as arguments for and against the introduction of such monetary instruments.

CATA found support for its views in the arguments presented in the Mowat Centre study and C.D. Howe commentary about the importance of rebalancing the indirect tax based mechanism to better achieve successful commercialization in Canada.

The issue of whether it is better for a company to pay out dividends or retain earnings is yet another long - running «religious» argument.

In fact one could even make the argument that the best trade for that type of situation is a long gold / short gold stocks position, but we digress.

The problem with this argument is that what is good for oil producers and exporters is inversely bad for major oil consumers and importers like the United States, Europe, and China in this zero sum game of global energy markets.

She has also been a strong voice for cooperation among progressive parties rather than for continued competition that mainly serves the interests of the Right (yes, yes, I know the argument that having many choices on your ballot is supposed to be a good thing, but the outcomes of Alberta elections suggest that in fact for progressives, it's just the opposite).

As a well - known expert in renewable energy and energy efficiency, Konrad laid out a bullish argument for the company, and disclosed that he «had a large long position» (at the time of the article).

«While Americans do respond to the arguments that American jobs are being lost to low price imports and that the US should push for better trade deals, the counter arguments — that tariffs could hurt the solar industry overall, and that there is a risk of starting a trade war — do better,» notes Steve Kull, the director of University of Maryland's PPC.

Lol — thanks for providing a good demonstration of what realbuckeyball was speaking of... that is, that you certainly don't seem to be able to construct a coherent argument to support what you say.

The second concept necessary for the encyclical's argument is the common good: «To desire the common good and strive towards it is a requirement of justice and charity.»

But if you are looking for consilience, in which multiple lines of independent evidence converge on the same target, then Schwartz's argument is a good one to have in your arsenal, for it fits nicely with biological arguments for intelligent design (cf. Michael Behe's Darwin's Black Box), recent philosophical work on mental causation (cf. Robert Koons» Realism Regained), cosmological fine - tuning (cf. John Barrow and Frank Tipler's The Anthropic Cosmological Principle), and consciousness studies (cf. Dean Radin's The Conscious Universe).

Best of all, she suggests that people of faith do themselves and others a disservice when they use the bible selectively to bolster their arguments for specific political views and lifestyle prescriptions, using it «as a blunt weapon», as she puts it.

Regardless, it's not as nice to have the frame of a well made argument dismissed as irrelevant when I didn't quote scripture or say I'd pray for you, right?

You raise a very good point that escapes most theists and that is while they argue against atheists for not believing in their god, they forget that most of those arguments could be applied to them by somebody of another religion.

for lack of good talking points, you concoct 2 straw men arguments.

Although good food for thought, is not actually an argument for the existence of God.

You'd think you'd have a better handle on the issue before you made fun of someone else for having a «flawed argument».

If you hate them in the same way that you condemn them for being, it makes you no better than the Stereotypes you portrayed in your comment, so grow up, and use a logical argument, instead of the very hate Democrats decry, and the Tea Party embraces.

Then, when the skeptic disbelieves in the space ship because of the Chad's poor argumentation and the invisible, undetectable nature of the space ship, Chad asks, «What investigation have you done to disbelieve in my invisible and undetectable spaceship which I can not offer any good arguments for?»

I'm a materialist as well as an atheist and therefore don't believe in free will so I don't agree with some of what you said anyways but that's an argument for another thread.

If you hate them in the same way that you condemn them for being, it makes you no better than the Stereotypes you portrayed in your comment, so grow up, and use a logical argument, instead of the very hate Democrats decry, and the Tea Party embraces.Hate against any group of people you dis - agree is still hate and is not tolerable in my opinion.

The arguments for and against each of the WWII attacks that I note are well docu mented, so I won't go into them now.

The best biblical support for this argument is the story of Job.

Their argument for including the Bible completely ignores its unparalleled influence on history, how it has shaped modern thought and the fact that it remains one of the world's best - selling books every single year.

The best way to meet Boswell's argument is to grant for a moment that the O.T. prohibitions reflect idolatrous worship practices, that homosexual acts are wrong because they are used liturgically in false worship of false gods and goddesses.

This book has been my companion for eight years of Advent now, for some reason I find more solace in poetry during times of longing than in any well - delivered sermon or point - by - point systematic theology argument.

This forms the basis for the argument for the soul, which was well presented by Kevin Douglas in the January issue of this magazine.