Good statistical practice is an essential
component of good scientific practice, the statement observes, and such practice «emphasizes principles of good study design and conduct, a variety of numerical and graphical summaries of data, understanding of the phenomenon under study, interpretation of results in context, complete reporting and proper logical and quantitative understanding of what data summaries mean.»
You neglect to mention that Holdren has been far from the only scientist who finds Lomborg's Skeptical Environmentalist ridiculous: In 2003, the Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty ruled the book was «clearly contrary to the standards
of good scientific practice» and that «there has been such perversion of the scientific message in the form of systematically biased representation that the objective criteria for upholding scientific dishonesty... have been met»