The final inspection report by the U.S. Department of Education's inspector general's office concluded that department officials may have intended to «stack» the panels
of grant reviewers with those who favored a particular teaching methodology.
For now, young researchers have to rely on what Smith calls the open - mindedness
of grant reviewers.
As an industry scientist, I'm less susceptible to the whims
of grant reviewers, but I still work at a company that's largely grant funded.
Typical duties
of a Grant Reviewer are processing applications, maintaining filing systems, collecting data, writing reports, forwarding their findings to supervisors, and providing advice to those who apply for a grant.
Not exact matches
Wagstaff, a chemist with a Ph.D. in STEM education research and an affinity for increasing diversity and inclusion in STEM, led an agency - wide effort to broaden NIJ's pool
of peer
reviewers, STEM graduate fellows, and R&D
grant applicants.
«Every
grant that we had reason to believe did not have optimal online review, or an optimal number
of reviewers, was evaluated face - to - face.»
NIH is starting several pilot projects, including a training module that aims to teach young researchers how to design better experiments and medical - style checklists that
grant reviewers will use to check the design
of proposed experiments.
It is up to the
grant reviewers and tenure and hiring committees in each field to determine how they value different forms
of dissemination.
The FIRST Act would reauthorize the National Science Foundation, but its provisions would amount, to quote White House science adviser John Holdren, to «adding congress as
reviewers»
of NSF
grant proposals.
Reviewers have a lot
of expectations that are not usually formally stated — these are just tacitly agreed - upon norms that you need to discover, ideally before writing the
grant.
Grant reviewers are supposed to assess newbies and VIPs separately, but they're also told to fund the
grants with the greatest chance
of success.
More than 200 people have weighed in so far, many
of them frustrated researchers,
grant reviewers, and others inside and outside the cancer field.
«Many scientists worry that
grant reviewers will note the gap in productivity and go «Oh, this person took a year's break, they aren't really serious,»» says a biologist at the University
of Illinois, Chicago (UIC), who requested anonymity.
He said that DOE will need 300 to 400
reviewers in the next 6 months to handle the expected flood
of grant applications triggered by DOE's share
of the $ 787 billion stimulus package and the hike in its annual budget for 2009.
Elizabeth Goodwin, who was a biologist at the University
of Wisconsin (UW), Madison, until resigning in February 2006, admitted «that she included manipulated data» in a
grant progress report «to convince
reviewers that more scientific progress had been made with her research than was actually the case,» the Department
of Justice announced on Friday.
Buckius then offered up a more substantive criticism, suggesting that posting pending
grant winners would spur widespread second - guessing
of reviewers.
► «Armed with new data showing black applicants suffer a 35 % lower chance
of having a
grant proposal funded than their white counterparts, NIH officials are gearing up to test whether
reviewers in its study sections give lower scores to proposals from African - American applicants,» Jeffrey Mervis wrote on Thursday.
If you have an opportunity to respond to a letter that is unjustifiably critical, try (if you can) to succinctly point out, in the gentlest possible way, that the writer is not the best person to judge work in your field, and guide the committee toward more informed opinions (external evaluators and
reviewers of papers or
grant proposals).
Program officers have already begun to build a database
of potential
reviewers, choosing scientists with a track record
of winning
grants and publishing their results.
A review panel found in 2009 that the ERC's management system was «obsolete» in the way it left nonscientist bureaucrats in charge
of day - to - day operations, leading to constant low - level conflict and even «abusive» requirements
of volunteer
grant reviewers.
To convince administrators and
grant reviewers of the worthiness
of their work, scientists have to be cheerleaders for their research; they may not be as
In Getting to the Top
of a Big Pile, contributing editor Elisabeth Pain offers advice gleaned from interviews with
reviewers of ERC's Starting Independent Researcher
Grant applications.
Any problems the
reviewers have with your rationale / significance must be addressed early in the rebuttal and in the body
of the
grant application with sufficient clarity that the
reviewer will be convinced.
Because very few
of the
grants discussed during the study section meeting will be funded in this submission cycle, each
reviewer will choose one or two
grants to champion.
The
reviewer uses his or her knowledge
of science to decide if your
grant is novel, is likely to result in new, important information, and can be accomplished with your experimental plan.
While you may be viewing your
grant application as the magnum opus
of your life's ambitions and plans — for the next 5 years anyway — a
reviewer sees it as one
of six to 12 other «magnum opii» projects to evaluate.
The revised biosketch is now being phased in across NIH, despite howls
of protest that it burdens
grant reviewers and lets scientists inflate the importance
of their work.
The bill language is ambiguous, calling for disclosure
of «[t] he employer, and either the name and title or a unique identifier,
of each individual who served as a peer
reviewer for the
grant program» during the previous 6 months.
NSF tests «radical» idea
of using
grant applicants as
reviewers to ease strain on peer - review system
The bill would force government
granting agencies to, among other requirements, post funded applications on the Web, provide lists
of reviewers, and enable unsuccessful applicants to request a «debriefing» from agency officials.
So the bill calls for greater reliance on preproposals, withholding the nonresearch components
of a
grant proposal until
reviewers have given it a thumbs up, and creating a centralized database with the biosketches
of applicants so that information doesn't have to be recreated for every agency.
Branch has included social media activity in the engagement plans
of his
grant applications, but reports a mixed reception from
reviewers.
A team
of «seasoned» scientific
reviewers and scientists provide
grant - writing tips based on the PHS 398 application, the application form used for most NIH
grants, including R01 research
grants, fellowships, and career training
grants.
Researchers tend to think
of their
grant proposals as carefully guarded information that will be seen only by peer
reviewers in strictest confidence.
[4] CIHR continues to work on issues regarding the size and membership
of the expert panels, the use
of teleconferencing in early stage review, and the algorithms used to match applications to
reviewers, issues which will need to be resolved prior to the next competition for both «Foundation» and «Project»
grants, scheduled for fall 2016.
NIMH will also work to improve communication and outreach by providing webinars and conference presentations for applicants about clinical trials, and will work to ensure a consistent understanding
of this approach by
grant reviewers.
Failure to disclose substantial financial or other conflicts
of interest to internal or external monitoring bodies, organisations or publishers upon preparation, submission or publication
of a manuscript or a
grant application, or while acting as a
reviewer for scholarly journals, funding agencies, or as a member
of internal and external career advancement and recruitment committees or other professional duties.
Ad hoc
reviewer for several
grant agencies including: Wellcome Trust, European Commission, Medical Research Council
of UK, Funding for Scientific Research
of Belgium, National Research Agency
of France, National Cancer Institute
of France, the Broad Foundation for Scientific and Medical Research
of USA, Health Research Board
of Ireland, Italian Ministry
of University and Research, Italian Ministry
of Health, Italian National Institute
of Health, Italian - German University, Italian National Research Council, Al Neelain University
of the Islamic Republic
of Sudan, Cancéropôle Grand Ouest
of the French government, Ministry
of Health
of the Czech Republic, Ministry
of Science, Technology and Space State
of the State
of Israel, Cancer Research Wales, Kuwait University.
He also serves as a peer
reviewer for various scientific journals in the field
of cancer research and immunology and as
reviewer for
grants in scientific review study sections
of the NIH and National Cancer Institute (NCI).
I am an expert
reviewer of AERES («Agence d'évaluation de la recherche et de l'enseignement supérieur», France),
reviewer of grant proposals for the National Science Foundation (NSF), USA and Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), as well as
reviewer of several scientific journals.
For the National Institutes
of Health, he has served as an ad hoc and standing
reviewer member for a number
of grant review study sections.
I am able to network with professionals from diverse disciplines, to interact with colleagues in other institutions across the nation, to match my interests and work skills to a good career, to be a peer -
reviewer (and to be peer - reviewed), to learn about career and
grant opportunities, to work in a team setting, to familiarize myself with the variety
of available careers, and to have a very well - rounded experience outside
of the lab.
In 2007, the last year for which figures are available, 19 percent
of the
grants awarded to individual scientists were made as exceptions, or given outside
of rankings by scientific
reviewers, according to a report by the Government Accountability Office provided to The New York Times.
Granted, this
reviewer's a long - time fan
of Crowe's work, but don't let that dissuade you - Jerry Maguire is one
of the best character dramas
of its decade, and what it's got to say makes even more sense in the current climate.
Eight schools received launch
grants to support their opening this fall, and, in a smart new category
of grants, 30 schools intending to launch programs in the fall
of 2014 received funds to help them in their planning process (full disclosure: I served as a
reviewer for the launch
grants).
I've written previously about its role in creating proof points capable
of scaling for the field that help propel the education system more toward a fully competency - based, student - centric one, and now NGLC is at it again (full disclosure: I serve as a
reviewer for their
grants).
I believe that
grant reviewers should be required to explain, under oath, the single main point
of the pages they just read.
The director
of the institute, Edward A. Curran, has recommended that the nie expand its current list
of grant - proposal
reviewers to include at least 100 additional people — who would be paid by nie to evaluate unsolicited requests for a total
of up to $ 1 million in
grants for 15 to 20 federal projects.
Wood, who began his career as a social studies and history teacher in South Carolina, says he didn't really understand the impact
of policy on what he did in the classroom until U.S. Secretary
of Education Richard Riley invited him to Washington in 1993 to write the guidelines and serve as chief
reviewer for the department's new Technology Innovation Challenge
Grants program.
External
Reviewer, Illinois State Board
of Education, School Improvement
Grant Applications (May - June 2014)