Sentences with phrase «of greenhouse warming»

This would imply that feedback actually works to reduce the net effect of greenhouse warming, from a sensitivity of 1.2 to one something like 0.6 C per doubling.

I followed up by asking whether broad powerful fronts like those seen in the video emerge in climate simulations used to assess the impacts of greenhouse warming.

It is even less likely that detailed explanations of greenhouse warming would be effective.

So, although much of the greenhouse warming is directly due to water vapor, the temperature «set point» is more strongly affected by the more stable and well - distributed CO2.

This is a predictable, and predicted, result of greenhouse warming, though it could be due to natural variation.

That is not to say that some steps can not be taken now; indeed many kids of energy conservation and efficiency increases make economic sense even without the threat of greenhouse warming.

No greenhouse effect or some preferred level of greenhouse warming?

This point is especially appropriate in this age of greenhouse warming / climate change.

Because changes in tropical circulation have been strongly related to the recently observed planetary surface warming, this research is relevant to the issues of greenhouse warming.

Then comes Kerry Emanuel, a climate scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who's been studying possible impacts of greenhouse warming on tropical storms for decades — and who has lately been vocal about his longtime affiliation with the Republican Party.

Panel on Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy,

Indeed, of all the silly things that have been said about the climate by political operatives and others who can not accept the 150 - year old physics of greenhouse warming for ideological reasons, perhaps the silliest is the claim that scientists do not agree about those fundamental physics.

That affects ozone because one of the under - appreciated consequences of greenhouse warming of the lower atmosphere is cooling of the stratosphere — something we already observe.)

I think the much more likely reason is because the Mann Hockey Stick, the poster child of greenhouse warming and justifying the Kyoto Protocol, has been shown to be a dud, and some people are having difficulty coping with that reality.

A proper understanding of greenhouse warming over geological timeframes requires considering both CO2 levels and solar activity.

The other significant finding is that solar forcing will add another 0.18 °C warming on top of greenhouse warming between 2007 (we're currently at solar minimum) to the solar maximum around 2012.

«Early Developments in the Study of Greenhouse Warming: The Emergence of Climate Models.»

«I would say, and I don't think I'm going out on a very big limb, that the data as we have it does not support a warming... I personally feel that the likelihood over the next century of greenhouse warming reaching magnitudes comparable to natural variability seems small»

I personally feel that the likelihood over the next century of greenhouse warming reaching magnitudes comparable to natural variability seems small

The global warming theory has been based all along on the idea that the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans would absorb much of the greenhouse warming caused by a rise in man - made carbon dioxide, then they would let off that heat and warm the atmosphere and the land.

«Tropospheric warming in the tropics is a signature of greenhouse warming, but it is more accurate to say that it is not a unique signature (i.e., you get this «hotspot» with all types of forcings).

This arises when they depart from long - standing and long - accepted practice in response to contrarian memes (for example, by entertaining the possibility that a short period of a reduced rate of warming presents a challenge to the fundamentals of greenhouse warming.)

To name two examples, both John Tyndall — who first discovered the roles of water vapor and carbon dioxide as greenhouse gases in 1859 - 60 — and Svante Arrhenius — who hand - calculated the first model of greenhouse warming in 1896 — used this terminology in the titles of their ground - breaking papers.

The earth is being pulled to a warmer climate and will be pulled increasingly in this direction as the «anchorman» of greenhouse warming continues to grow stronger and stronger.

«It's not a major effect compared to other sources of greenhouse warming, but when it contributes up to 10 percent [of aircraft - produced warming emissions], you have to take it into account,» said Brasseur.

Cai, W.J., and P.H. Whetton, 2000: Evidence for a time - varying pattern of greenhouse warming in the Pacific Ocean.

Around 700 million years ago, the entire Venusian surface appears to have melted and reformed, which may have been a continuation of the greenhouse warming that dried out the planet.

«Many who are unwilling to accept the full brunt of greenhouse warming have embraced a more comforting compromise reminiscent of the Tychonic system *: that CO2 has some role in climate but its importance is being exaggerated.

The observed long - term pattern of warming closely matched computer predictions of a greenhouse warming «signature,» entirely different from changes that might be due to solar activity, volcanoes, or other possible influences on climate.