Sentences with phrase «of grey literature»

Much of the grey literature contained information about Indigenous viewpoints on «what works» to prevent violence against women.

I'm not sure it has specifically been covered in the postings and comments that I have read, but the control of grey literature in academic institutions is included in the concept of institutional repositories.

H. Hall, «You'll wish it was all over: the bibliographic control of grey literature with reference to print football fanzines»» 10 Serials 189.

The digital archive collection of the Harvard Law School Library includes selected Harvard Law School publications, government documents (both U.S. and foreign), and secondary legal and law - related sources, such as reports and studies from organizations, scholarly societies, and other types of grey literature.

Walt Crawford, an engaging and controversial voice in the library world, has just released an article characterizing blogs and other forms of grey literature as «the most compelling and worthwhile literature in the library field today.»

But in this age of the electronic resource, for those of us who work in the NRC Information Centres directly with researchers, often its just as easy and as much fun for us to find that piece of grey literature ourselves than to send the order in to our Document Delivery group.

The face of grey literature and in particular the efforts required to collect them have changed significantly since the internet has made electronic publishing the norm for a large number of information producers.

What's wrong with the IPCC goes far deeper than the question of the proportion of grey literature or quotas for non-white contributors.

If it can't cope with the problem of grey literature, and will be including more of it, as Pearce suggests may be the case, maybe it should just admit to being political, not a scientific organisation.

WHY THESE FINDINGS MATTER Governments around the world need to base their policies on impeccable research - not a report that relies on 5,587 instances of grey literature to make its case.

Start with the continued use of grey literature and move on from there.

a) Who (e.g., what organization) is the source of the grey literature citation?

It should include a look at institutional responses to IAC, selection of authors and lead authors and a count of grey literature cited in AR5.

The Panel adopted a number of decisions in this regard, including on the treatment of grey literature and uncertainty, and on a process to address errors in previous reports.

Michael Fulford, one of Bradley's colleagues at the University of Reading, has been piloting a study of the grey literature about Roman Britain, with similarly exciting results.

Not exact matches

«I became aware that what I was teaching would be out of date without looking at the grey literature,» says Bradley.

Bradley is one of a growing number of academics in the United Kingdom who are doing their digging in the masses of unpublished «grey literature» generated when commercial archaeologists are brought in to excavate before any sort of construction.

However, the «grey literature» has no place in a work that purports to be a serious text book on the subject of climate change.

I did a little bit of that, but one of the problems that I faced was that when you do that you're basically looking at particularly types of literature — largely journal articles — and a lot of teacher supply and demand data come from what we call «grey literature», which is literature that isn't published by recognised publishing houses.

The store is the physical incarnation of a monolithic business of immense wealth that is changing the face of literature itself, but from within it is all very boring, very safe, in an upscale grey palette kind of way.

What I said was «As authors, we had to report only the best available science (inclusive of a select few grey literatures as per the rules of procedure) which is «policy - relevant and yet policy - neutral» and that's what we collectively did while writing the Asia Chapter.

The 2007 report used a non-peer-reviewed study produced by an NGO — known as «grey literature» — to erroneously project that 80 percent of the Himalayan glacier area would very likely have melted by 2035.

Please provide a link to a reputable source that documents the usage of such literature in WG1, or, failing that, provide a link to that portion of WG1 in question and to the grey literature on which it was based.

That's why a lot of people are now trying to sell the idea that the IAC review has called for an outright ban on grey literature.

The BT approach uses values estimated from existing studies that are published in academic or grey literature as an approximation for valuing environmental services and social welfare of carbon offset projects.

I guess we could say that there are varying shades of grey in the grey literature.

According to Pielke: «I have noticed recently a number of peer - reviewed papers that reference so - called «grey literature» (e.g., agency, company, NGO reports) which hasn't itself been peer reviewed.

Put another way, three - quarters of the material cited there is grey literature.

Despite vigorous protests from its own expert reviewers, 42 % of the documents cited in one chapter of the climate bible are grey literature rather than peer - reviewed.

As we've seen over the last couple of years, many of the more outlandish and alarmist claims in the IPCC reports have been based not on peer - reviewed science, but on «grey literature» — the propaganda sheets and press releases distributed by fanatical green NGOs (many of which are part - funded by the European Commission — but that's another story).

Not to mention all the other issues unearthed, like the evident pattern of errors and bias, or the control of the «independent» Wegman panel by Peter Spencer, who apparently chose the research and «grey literature» examined by Wegman et al..

Grey area indicates the 98th and 90th percentiles (light / dark grey) of the literature (AR4 database (Hanaoka et al. 2006) and more recent literature (Clarke et al. 2010; Edenhofer et al. 2010)-RRB-.

Grey area indicates the 98th and 90th percentiles (light / dark grey) of the literature (for references, see Figure 4).

Grey area indicates the 98th and 90th percentiles (light / dark grey) of the literature.

There is a big difference between a private company employing a leading expert, and the IPCC employing a political activist who reviewed and published his own work grey literature (non peer reviewed) which amounted to little more than an advert for his own industry and by doing so helped push the IPCC's political agenda and fill his own bank balance, but also failed to provide any independent scientific evidence of a way forward.

McShane and Wyner's background exposition of the scientific history of the «hockey stick» relies excessively on «grey» literature...»

Neither is BEST a review of the hockey stick data, just the earth surface temps according to weather station sighting, rather than proxies, and yet the BBC have claimed that this non-peer review grey literature (as it is at this time) is conclusive proof of ALL AGW alarmist claims.

McShane and Wyner's background exposition of the scientific history of the «hockey stick» relies excessively on «grey» literature and is replete with errors, some of which appear to be have been introduced through a misreading of secondary sources, without direct consultation of the cited sources.

Some of the «grey literature» discussed, such as Soon and Baliuans and Wegman, falls squarely into the contrarian canon.

«A citizens audit of the IPCC study found that 5,587 cited references, nearly a third of all sources, were not peer - reviewed publications, but rather «grey literature,» such as press releases, newspaper and magazine articles, discussion papers, masters and PhD theses, working papers and advocacy literature published by environmental groups,» Sensenbrenner said.

Enhanced guidance on the use of «grey literature» — material not published in peer - reviewed scientific journals — has also been drawn up, and will be finalised by chairs of the IPCC's working groups in the coming months.

The accuracy of much of the PR firms to date has been very accurate to date as we have seen by the recent IPCC grey literature meltdown and the corruption revealed in climategate.

At the same time the IPCC should renounce, or at least severely restrict the use of, grey literature.

That analysis demonstrated unequivocally that much of their «scientific history» was derived from the third - party grey literature descriptions in Wegman et al and M&M, while many of the actual citations given by M&W were clearly not actually read by the authors.

To make things worse, NO book or report published by a genuine publishing agency is actually considered «grey» literature, regardless of whether there is any peer review or not -LRB-!).

I have nothing much against the use of «grey literature» (or — I might as well come clean all at once — the precautionary principle, a revenue - neutral carbon tax and opposition to consumerism and overpopulation) but it's got to be solid «grey literature» — Agoumi wasn't — and you've got it to paraphrase it accurately — the IPCC didn't and still hasn't.

This was in the wake of «Glaciergate», of course — the discovery that «grey literature» had been included in IPCC reports, which are supposed to be produced by «science».

So, essentially, he provides circular argument of anthropogenic garbage by referencing IPCC 2007 report, yet IPCC has stated they do not do science but put together different scenarios using grey literature, propaganda, news clipping, and the supposed science K.T. does.

[Pachauri] said the media and other sections of society had misunderstood the role of such information, labelling it grey literature, «as if it was some form of grey muddied water flowing down the drains».

Everyone had to write lots of what academics call «grey literature» discussing all theory and v & v tests.