We know that Christ died for us while we were yet sinners, yet we are too often unwilling to open up our lives to those who are caught in patterns
of habitual sin.
They teach that if you have patterns
of habitual sin in your life, you have good reason to question whether or not you actually have eternal life.
Not exact matches
Finnis and Grisez charge that, according to the logic
of Amoris Laetitia, some
of the faithful are too weak to keep God's commandments, and can live in grace while committing ongoing and
habitual sins «in grave matter.»
Those believers who are engaged in willful
habitual sin run the risk
of becoming children
of the devil instead
of children
of God, thus severing their relationship with God and «eternal» life itself.
However, this is vastly different from the practice
of willful and
habitual sin for which there is no guarantee
of forgiveness (1 Jn 3).
Ask yourself when you fall back into
habitual sin the most, and don't be surprised to find it is in moments
of unmanaged free time.
And, even though the Bible clearly refers to drunkenness as
sin, most Christians have hopped onto the AA bandwagon
of faith and believe that
habitual drunkenness is due to a disease called «alcoholism» or «addiction» rather than to
sin» (p. 74).
And by disbelief I do not mean some sort
of brave rejection
of the doctrine, some defiant demand flung at heaven for possession
of one's own soul; I mean merely the impotence
of an imagination that finds the very notion
of sin incomprehensible, the conscience
of a man who is sure that, whatever
sin might be, it surely lies lightly upon a soul as decent as his own, and can be brushed off with a single casual stroke
of a primly gloved hand; I mean an
habitual insensibility to the illuminations and chastisements
of beauty, a condition
of being wholly at home in a world from which mystery and
sin and glory have all been banished, and in which spiritual wretchedness has become material contentment.
For alcoholism, the emphasis has changed from
sin to sickness; and while there are still people who attribute moral weakness to the
habitual drunkard, the general consensus
of the medical profession now is to diagnose disease.