Do you see your paintings as images
of hetero - male desire?
There is a lot of promise within «The Intervention,» as DuVall spikes a mix of Sundance - ready ideas with sprightly ensemble work, nonetheless with an unblinking presentation
of hetero and homosexual relationships mixing socially.
The film also has way more sex than ever made it into the book - not
all of it hetero.
The balancing act
of hetero - and homosexual values is brilliant.
Pumped up to some whole new level
of hetero non-reality.
Law & order the old - fashioned way: discriminatory policy against outliers
of the hetero - normative mainstream.
Also, plenty
of hetero people enjoy sodomy.
But emphasizing this new standard did succeed in cementing these categories
of hetero - and homosexuality in the popular imagination.
Does it say that forms
of hetero s e x are sinful?
We could say that separatism is a judgment, a negative perception
of hetero - reality.
The fundamental reason is that the role of women as relational caretakers has been exercised for the nurturing
of hetero - relations rather than gynaffectionate relations.
The assumption that women are not really related to other women, the absence of understanding men in relationship to women, the refusal to acknowledge the homo - relational basis of heteroreality, the ignorance of connectedness with nature all attest to the relational naivete
of hetero - reality in comparison with a worldview based upon internal relations.
The result is that women's energy is expended in support
of hetero - relations.
In the first place, it helps to underscore the ludicrous assumptions
of hetero - reality.
I will note here that Catherine Keller's analysis
of hetero - reality in terms of the separate self - hood of men and the soluble selfhood of women corroborates the stunted character of relations within the dominant patriarchal worldview, which diminishes both relationality and individuality with its dualistic patterning of subject - object in male - female relationships.
Hetero - reality is created by the prevailing system
of hetero - relations, which expresses a range of social, political, and economic relations established between men and women by men.
Women who have been caretakers
of hetero - relations have not participated in worldmaking.
That EVERY gay person was a product
of hetero s3x?
As Howell notes, Raymond rejects the view of «scholarly proclaimers
of hetero - relations» that the theory and reality of feminism starts with woman's relationship to man (GFF 11).
So, from the perspective
of hetero - reality, the creator hero stands alone.
As Howell makes clear, women's relationality in patriarchal culture has been a function
of hetero - relations.
When a foreign born gay or lesbian has to leave the country despite being in a committed relationship because they can't marry and get the same benefit of residency that the spouses
of hetero Americans use all the time, that's a civil rights issue.
There simply isn't enough people who are gay to overtake
all of the heteros in America.
So if there is a man AND a woman the plural
of heteros is going to be the masculine form.
He did have a lot to say about the s3xual practices
of heteros, and much of it was BAD.
I happen to be straight, but I have gay friends and relatives and I can not believe that God will condemn them for the lust in their heart but forgive the lust
of heteros.
Not exact matches
It is true that
hetero - ists sometimes do sin in the actions
of sodomy which is a vile and wicked malignancy
of all social constructs that endorse the sodomizers» wants and wills all for but a few moments
of pleasure and then comes one's thoughts
of doing the abomidable Act
of sodomy!
They are just as solid as the
hetero ones... their children are just as well taken care
of... and God uses them just as well as He does heterosexuals.
If the couple wants to talk about their sexual topics, be it
hetero or homo, they will do that, and they must be treated with real, humble love and compassion, and not with brimstones and fire, and not making scapegoats out
of them in front
of the congregation.
I would be happier if the Gays would form an alliance with the
Heteros to get the Government out
of the bedroom.
so does that mean committed
hetero's are also sinful and thus stricken from the Lambs Book
of Life --------- Yes.
so does that mean committed
hetero's are also sinful and thus stricken from the Lambs Book
of Life?
Let's say there is a
hetero and same sex couple, both equal in every way, both born - again Christians, they do all the same things are are the type
of congregants pastors dream about; are they all going to heaven or is one going to hell or are they both going to hell, why or why not?
Thirty - two bishops get a 100 percent «
Hetero Score» and forty - eight get 0 percent, being totally free
of any taint
of heterosexism.
Two parents can be Mom and Dad, Mom and Mom, Dad and Dad... studies prove that children do just as well in same gender homes than they do in
hetero homes (the link to the study is listed above in response to another blathering
of yours).
First
of all, I do not think that morality has anything to do with this at all, on so much as there is just as much
hetero — and more — sexually immoral behavior that has ravished this country.
He is using 2 different Greek works (
heteros --RRB- and (allos) to show that the believers at Galatia are being led astray by those who are presenting a gospel
of a «COMPLETELY different kind» —
heteros, than what they had received.
And, it can be pointed out that technically, in the modern vernacular, the word sodomy can mean any se.xual act that is not directly penile penetration
of the va.gina... many
of these acts are regularly used by
hetero folks, including anal penetration, the use
of toys for penetration, etc..
It's been proved that a
hetero couple died
of AIDS as early as 1969, much earlier than the outbreak among g ay men in the 1980s.
I don't know what God thinks, but to me if gay marriage is about family life and the possibility
of raising children (in other words a desire on the part
of gays to be accepted into married life as it exists) then I think it is a good thing for the same reasons that I think
hetero families are good and necessary.
You are
hetero because your body reacts in a seual manner to members
of the opposite gender.
It is part
of who they are as a person, Kermit, much as being
hetero is a part
of who you are.
He talked about the s3xual sin
of ADULTERY by
heteros, but he did not consider commandments against gays to be worthy
of inclusion.
She did mention in the video that even her atheist friends were telling her that her philosophies were actually more Christian than atheist, so I rather think she was latently religious all along, sort
of like gays who live for years in
hetero relationships, then finally realize what they are, after years
of saying something else.
And if you are to prohibited same gender displays
of affection, would you do the same for
hetero couples?
When the Law
of Love becomes the measure
of whether or not an act sinful, the issue is no longer about sexual orientation,
hetero or homosexuality; but whether the act is one
of expressing love or exercising power / control over another.
Why, just out in my home state
of California... the Church
of Jesus Christ
of Later Day Saints (Mormons) and... the Catholics, decided to get together and pour millions
of dollars into California to defeat, proposition 8, which is... about 2 people
of the same gender being able to marry and have the same civil rights under the law as
hetero - married couples.
So in the first place I thought that if you were
hetero then you liked women how is it that they were
hetero and gay??? How do you explain the fact that they would not take lots daughters to mean that they were passing by women in favor
of men that sure sounds gay to me.
Jesus, who hung around with 12 men, NEVER trashed gays, but he sure had a lot
of bad things to say about
heteros.
Every County social services worker knows from direct and shocking experience with their hapless clients that it's actually the
HETEROS who are destroying marriage with their high rate
of 1) divorce 2) spousal abuse 3) sha cking up 4) child abuse 5) abandonment 6) drugs and alcohol, etc. etc..