For others its value was more as heritage, not a statement they expected to be implemented but of value as a kind
of holy text.
At least I give you credit for accepting (partially) this horror as part
of your holy text.
This word, typically in the form
of a holy text, is clearly written and created by men who are supposedly channeling the will of «god» into written form.
The scribe looked after the integrity
of the holy text by comparing manuscripts, and correcting possible errors and deviations from the canonical text.
Any god who could influence a person's thoughts could even more easily light up the sky with glowing letters
of holy text, yet there is nothing supernatural in origin influencing anything in this continuum.
The chanting
of the holy texts raises them up from the mundane and presents them «as on a platter of gold», in the words of Fr Josef Jungmann.
this is exacly why we must discuss the meaning
of the holy texts of the past and how they may be percieved by people.
Momo, there are many different intepretations
of the Holy texts, many different books and often times different ways to view the meaning within the same text.
They use «sweetened up» versions
of the holy texts, to get around certain Western values and get more converts.
Questioning the very foundation upon which the beliefs and religion are built requires no knowledge
of the holy texts.
Not exact matches
Review: If you're interested in, say, running a service that delivers mattresses on the back
of a bicycle or becoming an itinerant wedding photographer, here's your
holy text.
But if you're interested in, say, running a service that delivers mattresses on the back
of a bicycle or becoming an itinerant wedding photographer, here's your
holy text.
The written Logion — Oracles, the
Holy Scripture were committed to Israel's keeping and still to this day exists as the one and only Hebrew
text (amidst all the different versions / translations
of the Bible).
It doesn't matter to me whether this is «correct» exegesis — either the Bible finds some way
of adapting to the modern notions
of morality, or it gets left by the wayside on the ever growing dung - heap
of rejected
holy texts of human history — in my opinion, that's the historical moment we are currently faced with.
The BIble, when interpreted by the
Holy Spirit (and all our best efforts to hear the
texts as the original hearers would have understood them), is the Word
of God.
First
of all, I would like to point out that Toby begins his post by writing that, «Christians believe that their
holy text, the Bible, is the inerrant word
of God.
what did it tell us
of disease, the universe, relationships, treatment
of women... I would hazard a guess that women were treated with more respect before the advent
of any
of the so called
holy texts..
The
holy text continues to state: «The limits
of the created universe can not be perceived.
Police arrested Rimsha last month after a neighbor accused her
of burning pages containing
texts from the Muslim
holy book, the Quran.
The mission
text was the «great commission» — «Go therefore and make disciples
of all nations, baptizing them in the name
of the Father and
of the Son and
of the
Holy Spirit» (Matt.
The concern
of Jesus in this particular
text is that the unpardonable sin is against the
Holy Spirit.
Books like
Holy Hilarity help us break out
of the box
of reading the Bible with straight faces, so that we can see the truth in the
text.
In an attempt to simplify, we force the Bible's cacophony
of voices into a single tone, to turn a complicated, beautiful, and diverse
holy text into a list
of bullet points we can put in a manifesto or creed.
In this perspective on this key
text (John 1:14) we have a remarkable prophetic description not only
of the Incarnation but also
of the
Holy Eucharist and
of the Tabernacle, as part
of the very plan
of God in sending Christ into the world.
Professor Bates helps us see a way in which the New Testament speaks
of the
Holy Trinity: it recognises the Divine Persons speaking to or about each other in certain Old Testament
texts.
I feel that all you could possibly need to know to lead a fruitful life concerning the
Holy Spirit could easily fit on fewer than ten pages
of text.
I would like to suggest that this important
text refers not only to the Incarnation
of the Son
of God in Bethlehem but also to the
Holy Eucharist and that it is prophetic
of the Church's development
of doctrine, supporting that development, and putting it within a cosmic context.
In this key
text Jesus links the whole plan
of God from the beginning to the
Holy Eucharist — «As I who am sent by the living Father... so whoever eats me will draw life from me».
However, it is not enough to just say «I am trusting the leading
of the
Holy Spirit to help me understand this
text.»
After all the controversy
of last week, it's tempting to turn this post into a discussion on gendered language around the
Holy Spirit (feminine in Hebrew and Aramaic, typically neuter in Greek, masculine in this particular
text), but that's just not how this passage is «singing» to me today, so instead I'd like to focus on Jesus» stirring and tender words in verse 18: «I will not leave you as orphans.»
According to Enns, we would do well to learn a few things from the Jewish readers
of Scripture whose emphasis in engaging the
holy text is «not on solving the problems once and for all but on a community upholding a conversation with Scripture with creative energy.»
This statement is often cited as a universal description
of the
holy otherness and imperceptibility
of God, but anyone familiar with other
texts will hear the soft whisper
of a reply, «Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God» (Matt.
Aside from 2 Timothy 3:16, another key
text is 2 Peter 1:21 which indicates that men
of God were moved, carried, or driven by the
Holy Spirit to write Scripture.
Gregorian chant gives an elevated tone
of voice to the
texts of our sacred praises, conveying the special character
of the words and the
holy nature
of what is being enacted and undertaken.
The people, standing at the foot
of this mountain, were embraced, says the
text, with «a
holy fear» that made them receptive to the word
of the Lord.
In Jewish tradition, we frequently speak in terms
of «Written Torah» (the
text of the Hebrew Scriptures as they have come down to us) and «Oral Torah» (the ensuing centuries
of conversations and interpretations
of our sages and rabbis, which are also considered to be
holy.)
During that time, we studied the story
of Joseph as it appears in both
of our traditions — in
holy text (Torah and Qur «an) and in commentary (midrash and tafsir)-- and also learned a lot about each other.
The Word
of God is not necessarily the
text but is always that understanding in your heart (soul if you will) which happens through the
Holy Spirit.
The «
holy»
text of my ancestors, the Edda, says the same thing except it has other magic beings involved.
His honest answer would most likely be this: «Because
of where I was born and my parents & peers I grew up around told me that the bible was the only true
holy text and that I would be shunned if I even looked at another religion with interest.»
The authority
of the
text is a comprehensive one involving theoretical and experiential factors by which God moves us through the
Holy Spirit to transform our lives, initially by conversion, then through the discipleship that necessarily follows this.
We see many great people
of God throughout the Bible at their lowest points and how their faith in God led them to be used for great things (and so despite their grievous sin we see them as
holy because they grew and showed great faith and fruit) but what about those in the Bible who are said to have believed but are never heard from again in the
text?
real people are commiting crimes in the name
of religion and backs up there claims in real
texts that we claim to be
holy.
In spite
of all
of these, we are not in charge, and it is my sense that too often all that «
text» can run interference on the
Holy Spirit.
This anti-Semitism comes from the
holy texts of Islam and from the entire Islamic religious establishment.
However, even independently
of their bearing on the Church's interpretation
of Jesus» life, death, and resurrection, these
texts have been held
holy for the simple reason that they give authoritative expression to the central themes
of promise and hope that constitute the core
of biblical faith.
You have built your faith upon the sand
of your contradictory «
holy»
texts.
Demanding strictly scientific precision to guarantee Scripture's trustworthiness, requiring something more objective than the internal, personal witness
of the
Holy Spirit through the
text itself, scholars like Lindsell end up testing the truth
of the Bible by an extra-Biblical standard.32 As with Davis, externally derived «good reasons» become the ultimate criterion for judging the gospel.
While the basic structure and words
of the core components
of the liturgy do not change from Sunday to Sunday, there are changes in other
texts, particularly the various readings from
Holy Scripture appointed for every Sunday and festival day, that give the various times in the Church Year their unique emphases and nuances.
The Bible is almost always present, since any medieval
text was, no matter what its style, to some degree a continuation or concretization
of the
Holy Scripture.