A pioneer of the British Pop Art movement in the early 1960s alongside Richard Hamilton, David Hockney gained recognition for his semi-abstract paintings on the theme
of homosexual love before it was decriminalized in England in 1967.
These concepts eventually led Hockney to the famed series of paintings produced in 1960/61 that focused on the themes
of homosexual love.
This is apparent in the pictures
of homosexual love and comradeship, painted while he was a student at the Royal College of Art, discovering gay life in London and already an emerging art star.
Hockney sought ways of reintegrating a personal subject - matter into his art, and began tentatively by copying fragments of poems on to his paintings, which later gave way to open declarations in a series of paintings produced in 1960 — 61 on the theme
of homosexual love.
Ivory is, after all, a pioneer
of homosexual love on screen — think back to his exquisite 1987 film based on EM Forster's Maurice.
For although we have arrived at a moment in cinema history where — at last — there are more remarkable cinematic accounts
of homosexual love than ever before (Barry Jenkins's Moonlight, Francis Lee's God's Own Country, John Trengove's The Wound), this film occupies a subtle category of its own.
For instance, we are told: «Civil partnerships were a huge step forward in the recognition
of homosexual love and commitment in a relationship» (p69).
Not exact matches
But perfect
love casts out fear... if he perfectly
loved, there would be no reason for him fear that we are destroying America... no fear for us to teach sunday school... and no fear
of the future when
homosexuals are accepted as equals, even in Alabama (where I live) or in whatever southern state fishon is in.
I
love homosexuals as much as I
love anyone else — maybe more because I sorrow for the burdens they carry because
of their sin.
The core assumption
of Virtually Normal» and a compelling one, too» is that the absence
of public laws granting
homosexuals full equality has helped create a culture in which homosexuality is considered dirty or sinful, and in which
homosexuals are deemed incapable
of loving each other with dignity and commitment.
But, in the 70s there was even less acceptance
of homosexuality in the church and I wonder if Lonnie ever seriously considered that a
loving committed
homosexual relationship was an option.
When we have those nuts at Westboro Baptist picketing soldier's funerals, spitting on
homosexuals, and making videos about how Santa is a fag and will send you to hell, we catch a glimpse
of what happens when abhorrence
of evil combined with confrontation consumes and destroys
love, catapulting them into realms
of hatred that Jesus would fall down weeping at the sight
of.
I
love the argument he makes, even while I am a progressive Christian who accepts
homosexuals as equals in the eyes
of God.
Many were unsatisfied with Charles's answers on same - sex marriage and felt that he had not addressed himself to
homosexual love even though he spoke
of having experienced it in his own past (at one time, he said, he had lived with a male lover for 14 years).
Two books published by Inter-Varsity Press also call for compassionate understanding, with one showing the struggles
of a young male
homosexual who seeks to live a celibate life although he deeply
loves another man (The Returns
of Love, by Alex Davidson, 1970).
The other book (Who Walk Alone, by Margaret Evening, 1974) speaks
of the gifts, sensitivity and
loving natures characterizing many
homosexual persons and includes this statement:
The official publication
of the Christian Booksellers» Association recently carried an article on trends in religious publishing which predicted more books on homosexuality «down the road (maybe five years or so)» and noted that just as there has been evidence
of more compassion toward divorced persons, «Christians in the future will be saying homosexuality is still wrong but God
loves homosexuals and values them as persons» (Bookstore Journal, January 1976).
«I
love the
homosexual community, because I
love sinners,» Hacker told me, adding that it was the propagation
of homosexuality that he worried about.
He goes on to give an example
of Agnosticism in action citing «an eminent critic and writer defending
homosexual practices» in terms
of a claim that there are `'» many normalcies
of love»».
having ssid that i think that for God sin is sin and only sin he can't forgive is the unpardonable sin
of unbeliving that Jesus is the the word made flesh who paid the penalty for sins on the cross at calvary he
loves homosexuals as much as heterosexuals.
If a
homosexual person is so made that an intimate
loving relationship is possible only with a member
of the same sex, on what basis can this experience
of love be declared sinful?
Christians who claim to be
loving, yet who brand
homosexuals as sinful and wicked, are themselves full
of prejudice.
As to what the Scriptures have to say about
homosexual orientation, my brother, you not only have to do deeper research, but most importantly approach Scripture in the Spirit
of Love, as a child who knows nothing, seeking the guidance
of his Father.
They know that I
love them and support them but I've also made my convictions clear that they must repent
of homosexual practices.
Indeed,
homosexual persons are called to live out the inclination which is natural for them, namely, in fidelity to another person
of the same sex, and enjoying sexual acts not primarily for pleasure but as expressions
of love.
What is wrong, what is unnatural, what is immoral and what is gross is intolerance and discrimination against fellow human beings for their sexual orientation and active pursuit
of preventing
loving and committed
homosexual couples from legally being married.
Is
loving our brother promoting
homosexual behavior or the killing
of 55 million babies in the name
of women's health, but under the guise
of love?
But all
of the recovering
homosexuals that I have spoken with have made a decision to live and
love as Jesus designed them to (their words, not mine).
At that moment, if the church had been logical and free
of homophobia, it would have re-examined the value
of homosexual activity as an expression
of human
love and companionship.
I, for one, would prefer to believe that the church is wrong about
homosexual activity than that this sadistic, superego God has any true relation to the God
of love revealed by Jesus.
Homosexuals have trouble
loving people
of the opposite sex.
The second thesis
of my book was that
homosexuals, rather than being somehow a menace to the values
of society and the family, as Christians have tended to assume, have, as a part
of God's creative plan, special gifts and qualities and a very positive contribution to make to the development
of society (cf. also my article «Homosexuality, Lesbianism, and the Future: The Creative Role
of the Gay Community in Building a More Humane Society,» in A Challenge to
Love: Gay and Lesbian Catholics in the Church, edited by Robert Nugent [Crossroad, 1984]-RRB-.
Scriptural authors never deal with
homosexual orientation, and when they do treat
homosexual activity, they never do so in the context
of a
loving relationship.
I also wrote it out
of love for and loyalty to the
homosexual community.
Once heterosexual and
homosexual people can stop dividing along the lines
of «gay vs. straight» and see each other as members
of Christ's body who are «one in Christ,» only then can we begin to come along side each other in
love to help each other follow Jesus more faithfully.
On the matter
of self and fulfillment, John Boswell, a Yale historian who has written some
of the major texts employed by
homosexual activists, asserts, «Not only is
homosexual eroticism the oldest and most persistent strand in the Christian theology
of romantic
love, but Christian religious life was the most prominent gay life - style in Western Europe from the early Middle Ages to the Reformation, about two - thirds
of the period since Europe became Christian.»
In the February 2013 issue
of Premier Christianity, Chalke wrote an article outlining his views on homosexuality, essentially saying that he saw no problem with
loving, committed
homosexual relationships.
Homosexual tendencies are chiefly a consequence
of miseducation by parents who have failed to establish secure and
loving associations with their children.
In what was perceived to be response to the pressure, the Cardinal issued a letter that said
homosexual friendship can be «a way
of loving,» and declared that «homophobia should have no place among Catholics.»
The answer often seems to be that the happiest solution is for
homosexuals to enter into long - term faithful relations in which they satisfy their sexual hungers in the context
of growing mutual
love and responsibility.
Of course, there were disagreements, but the statements, adopted overwhelmingly, are: «Married Life and the Gift of Love», «Ministry to Persons with a Homosexual Inclination» and «Happy Are Those Who Are Called to His Supper»
Of course, there were disagreements, but the statements, adopted overwhelmingly, are: «Married Life and the Gift
of Love», «Ministry to Persons with a Homosexual Inclination» and «Happy Are Those Who Are Called to His Supper»
of Love», «Ministry to Persons with a
Homosexual Inclination» and «Happy Are Those Who Are Called to His Supper».
Weirdest freaking thing to me has been that as you begin to share life with the homeless and the
homosexuals and the bikers and the rest
of the «malcontents» THEY begin to teach YOU what it means to
love, support, and care for your brothers.
There follow verbose passages about union, mutual
love, and support, etc., sentiments one finds in romantic poetry and in the sincere expressions
of homosexual lovers for each other.
The reason same - sex relations were condemned is because they were not in the context
of a
loving, long - term relationship (May I ask - do you tell
homosexuals that are only in a short - term, sexual relationship that they are sinning, and if so what is their response?)
Rather, we are to share the
love of God and the forgiveness
of sins that is available to all, including
homosexuals, through Jesus Christ.
The second greatest commandment, you shall
love your neighbor as yourself, certainly applies to those who are out
of the mainstream,
homosexuals included.
One thing I
love about the Gay Christian Network,
of which Justin is the director, is that it welcomes healthy dialog between folks on «Side A,» who believe
homosexual relationships have the same value as heterosexual relationships in the sight
of God, and folks on «Side B,» who believe only male / female relationships in marriage represent God's intent for sexuality.
Trustees reject solution
of Sunrise Children's Services president: «I would rather
homosexuals see the
love of God through us than be denied employment by us.»
Condemnation
of all
homosexual expressions
of love in the church today can also be questioned from the perspective
of Jesus» law
of love.
I also believe that
Homosexuals who accept Christ's sacrifice and
Love ALSO LIVE IN THE LIGHT
OF GOD»S GRACE.