In its decision, one of the judges referred to the claim for equal human rights protection as an effort to seek «the validation
of homosexual relations, including sodomy, as a protected and fundamental right... rebutting a millennia of moral teaching» and then shockingly went on to liken the protection of sexual orientation in human rights legislation with the «violently aberrant sexual configurations» of mass murderers Jeffrey Dahmer, Paul Bernardo and Clifford Olsen.
In the early chapters, Greenberg develops a typology
of homosexual relations.
I chose instead to focus on the figure (Jesus) to whom so many appeal erroneously for support
of their homosexual relations.
In recent years, he has been outspoken in his opposition within the Evangelical Church in Germany to any approval
of homosexual relations.
Chudacoff, who throughout his book tends to introduce the theme of homosexuality with hints and surmises rather than data, counters Stott's argument with this: «More recently [actually less recently — in 1985 and 1988] other historians have discovered hints [
of homosexual relations].»
Types of Moral Argumentation Regarding Homosexuality by Pim Pronk Eerdmans, 350 pages, $ 24.99 paper An interesting book not so much for the position it advances (approval
of homosexual relations) as for the claim that any position on homosexuality (or anything else) must be reached on the basis of moral reflection independent of nature, science, or theology.
Not exact matches
In particular, the movement
of some LWF churches to break with the Church's historic understanding
of Scripture and natural law by blessing same - sex marriages and ordaining
homosexual ministers has led to division within the Lutheran World Federation and strained
relations with ecumenical partners.
The married - sex - only agreement that Wheaton students and faculty sign is part
of the college's Community Covenant, which says that students agree the Bible condemns «sexual immorality, such as the use
of pornography, premarital sex, adultery,
homosexual behavior and all other sexual
relations outside the bounds
of marriage between a man and woman.»
The magisterium appeals to these authorities as grounds for repudiating divorce, abortion,
homosexual relations, and the ordination
of women to the priesthood.
I, for one, would prefer to believe that the church is wrong about
homosexual activity than that this sadistic, superego God has any true
relation to the God
of love revealed by Jesus.
The first and most obvious is that what he has to say captures so well the essence
of the revisionist argument, and second it makes clear that the argument
of the revisionists is the same whether they are speaking
of heterosexual or
homosexual relations.
These «highly religious» students tend to be more disapproving than their peers
of casual sex, abortion,
homosexual relations, and the legalization
of marijuana.
What he has to say about sexual
relations between single people, be they heterosexual or
homosexual, is
of a piece with, and in the end but an extension
of, what he says about marital
relations themselves.
The question
of the appropriate
relation of the church to
homosexuals and homosexuality has emerged as one
of major importance in the deliberations
of denominational bodies.
The answer often seems to be that the happiest solution is for
homosexuals to enter into long - term faithful
relations in which they satisfy their sexual hungers in the context
of growing mutual love and responsibility.
«Homosexuality refers to
relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons
of the same sex... Tradition has always declared that «
homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered.»
This means that the influence
of the church counts against faithful monogamous
relations among
homosexuals.
The reason same - sex
relations were condemned is because they were not in the context
of a loving, long - term relationship (May I ask - do you tell
homosexuals that are only in a short - term, sexual relationship that they are sinning, and if so what is their response?)
For a gay is not simply a
homosexual; he is someone who has made homosexuality the basis
of an entire personality and outlook - morals, politics, and social
relations.
Using their position within society as spokespersons for God to proclaim that all
homosexual relations are disdained by God, thus knowingly contributing to the cruel persecution
of a minority population.
Some
of these students would say they most identify with what groups like the Gay Christian Network term «Side A» (they believe
homosexual relationships have the same value as heterosexual
relations in the sight
of God).
Thus the principle
of cohumanity does enable us to distinguish between better and worse relationships, but it can not serve to dismiss
homosexual relations as worse a priori.
Let us now turn to inquire whether there may not be in fact principles
of theology which illumine the
relation between the church and homosexuality in terms other than the proscription
of homosexual acts.
Delegate Al Quie, the former governor
of Minnesota, had offered a resolution earlier in the day: «Rostered leadership
of this church who are
homosexual in their self understanding are expected to abstain from
homosexual sexual
relations and practicing
homosexual persons are precluded from rostered leadership in this church.»
We also practice family law, acting in the interests
of minors, couples and their
relations, including
homosexual relationships.
(3) Do the criminalisation
of homosexual activities and the threat
of imprisonment in
relation thereto, as set out in the Offences against the Person Act 1861
of Sierra Leone (Case C - 199 / 12), the Penal Code Act 1950
of Uganda (Case C - 200 / 12) or the Senegalese Penal Code (Case C - 201 / 12) constitute an act
of persecution within the meaning
of Article 9 (1)(a), read in conjunction with Article 9 (2)(c)
of the Directive?