Sentences with phrase «of huge wages»

Its hard to believe that manu lost 6 - 1 to man city, take nothing away from man city but every club uses manu as a measuring stick to compare themselves too, I really wish it was arsenal that gave that drubbing, I remember not long ago I was watching arsenal lose to manu by that you know what scoreline and my father (a manu fan) walk away, when it was 3 something becoz he couldn't watch a far one sided match, so I guess he is feeling what we are feeling that day, manu is always a side that neva lose by a huge margin no matter what, but tell you da truth I don't like man city becoz I do nt like a side that will spend and replace every single player and still have classy players on the bench, they can say that we won that and this but that becoz of the huge wages that we are paid, I just don't like football to be won by having money to spend there should be a mixture of everything good, middle and work in progress players.

Timing of substitutions, putting players in the wrong positions, favouritism, ignoring form, same tactics for every game, no plan B, lack of rotation, unable to sell average players because of their huge wages, and so on, and so on.

Not exact matches

That might not make a huge difference for one year, but it could add up to hundreds of thousands of dollars of lost wages over the course of your career.

Since 2002, almost 250,000 manufacturing workers have lost their jobs because of the high dollar and our huge and growing trade deficit with developing Asian countries. Many are older workers who will typically face a long stretch of unemployment, followed by employment in a new job at much lower wages.

The wages of this national sin are beginning to show up as the colossal national debt, the huge financial deficits of savings and loans associations, high unemployment and escalating numbers of homeless and hungry citizens.

It's absolutely stunning what a huge impact just 0.4 % of your annual wages can make for people in need.

On the other hand we've Ramsey, Coquelin, Jenkinson, Gibbs all decided to make the most of earnings without much work and one the contract is expired they'll move some other clubs and those clubs are lucky to have a better players with zero fees so they can afford to pay a slightly huge wages compared to their other players.

We've got ourselves into a bit of a vicious circle, without champions league football we will not be able to attract world class players or even potential world class players unless we pay them huge wages and there is no way we will do that, we have so many players coming into the final year (s) of their contracts who may or may not re sign.

Overall I would say Sanchez was just about good value for the money and wages we paid but OZIL was largely a waste of money, despite his undoubted huge talent, on the low percentage of occasions he could be arsed to show it.

All Prem players at all clubs earn huge wages, which can never remotely be justified in the wider aspect of value to society.

If some people can not or will not see that spineless Walcott represented everything spineless, idle and too comfy on huge, largely unearned wages, in Wengers last decade, then they are avoiding the reality of the cause of our decline.

What we have is a lot of rubbish / average players on huge wages.

He also has plenty of years left in the tank being only 25 years old, has Premier League experience, and wouldn't command a huge transfer fee or wages.

He would have to be wooed and awed by a massive wage / contract in order to leave and at 32, it is hard to see a top team paying huge wages to a center back who had two years of top flight experience.

The disgace of wasting huge wages on this con man and non tryer, (but with beautiful manners and a personable smile that obviously fooled many Gooners) was IMO Wengers greatest of his hundreds of mistakes.

They all spend huge amount of money pay massive wages.

THEY, have also had to pay hugely inflated transfer fee for all of them, and, apart fro Di Maria, Utd are a big step up from their previous clubs, and, will get a huge hike up in wages.

Not a bad player, but is constantly injured, so what would be the point of paying him those huge wages to hang out with the medical staff?

The 28 - year old is keen to leave his French club, but his huge transfer fee and his annual wages of around $ 18 million means there is not exactly a long line of clubs knocking on the door.

He is a player who we can't afford to lose.The club knows this, the fans know this, and just as importantly so does Mesut Ozil.The fact that he will be in a position to get himself a very nice Signing On Fee from whichever club he signs for after June means he will get the financial rewards he always wanted.Who can blame him for getting the very best for himself.If his abilities had been appreciated by the club and management earlier then the player would have not been in the position we have now where the cards are all held by him.To keep him will cost the club a huge signing on fee and colloidal wages but that is the price we must pay.We need him so pay him provided it is what SVEN M and RAUL advise.Im sure the player himself would be impressed that these 2 are involved and the whole structure of the club is moving forward.

Well, he is right that the players, by and large are a bunch of halfhearted coasters, staying at the club MAINLY to continue to pick up huge wages.

Even with the acquisition of Lacazette and Kolasinac (free), it has been a huge failure from the Arsenal brass in terms of not selling enough players, not being able to renew crucial contract on certain players, giving players huge wages when they don't deserve it, lack of ability to identify targets which is perhaps down to poor scouting, and not able to bring in players that would strengthen us in an already inadequate and flawed team.

Unless you think, being paid huge wages to NOT score many goals on a consistent basis, IS the sign of a quality striker, then I stand corrected.

Only four in Mavropanos Mkhi, Auba Evans seems unbalanced but many of those going were ready for the knackers, hardly used or on huge wages.

To be honest, over the whole last decade I am appalled by how Wenger collects timid players, ESPECIALLY 9 stone dripping wet midfield dwarfs, whom he generally plays out of postion on the right wing for a spell, thus undermining their condidence, most of them injury prone, yet kept unproductively for years and years, on the treatment table whilst still pocketing huge wages and rarely playing 100 % even when fit.

Proven diving, using slow motion replays and a panel of ex-players and refs, should be punished retrospectively with a six league match ban and a huge reduction in wages for tyhat period, written into the rules / laws of football and thus in all players contracts.

And while we are on that dread subject of Walcott, how many more decades will this wastrel be encouraged by the club to keep picking up huge wages for nothing in return.

In reality Arsenal has been a loser team for the past 11 seasons bailed out by the creation of new leagues to give more games to loser teams needing vast finances to pay huge player wages.

We all knew Arsenal would have huge problems selling players because of the ridiculous wages being paid to average players, and look what's happening!

One or two players, within our budget, will NOT make us favourites for either trophy, NOT, to say we can not win one, but, as a few have said, we keep buying players, we HAVE to let players go, and, no guarantee that those bought will flourish in our league, meanwhile, we lose a lot of very talented younger players, and end up like Chelsea, or Cty, with NO British players, huge wages, and still, no guarantee of success, only the club in financial difficulty.

So, when you talk aobut Bayern Munich's «bet spend» being # 15 million last season, that's true, but they may have huge wages, they may have tax advantages built into player salaries, on top of the enormous investment in players already on the books.

Then you can save money for the owner by having no real superstars so no huge wages + even have 13 average players on low wages 5 of whom are usually injured and 8 who play one game in 3 mostly from the bench.

So what are you trying to say it's ok for a player to be transfered to Arsenal on the back of a huge transfer fee and wages and perform poorly in their first two seasons.

Sterling is currently on wages of just # 30,000 per week and wants a huge pay rise, possibly as high as # 100,000 per week, and Brendan Rodgers is supposedly confident he will extend his stay on Merseyside and sign.

Until this tiny petty manager and owner leave football to the real passionate experts out there we won't even exsist as a top club so we're better off waiting for that day to come in 2/3 years and hope usamanov is the man to take over and cleanse the whole club from top to bottom and rid of Wengers cancer and loosers who get paid way to much just to install a tiny weak loser mentality and petty training and transfers Tactics with teeny weeny transfer fees and huge wages for mediocre staff n players Bring on 2020

I think it is because the level of players at each club has got higher due to television deals and the wages that English League Clubs will pay is huge compared to other leagues.

Kroenke would never spend 17m on a player that the club would never use, pay huge wages and look to sell for half of that the following year.

The money footballers get already is huge so i'm not sure many players will be enticed by going and playing in a hugely inferior league by offers of stupidly high wages.

I could ask you how many players have actually said Wenger was the reason for joining our club, but of course you'll come back with negatives such as «they only come for an easy ride» or» Wengers pets» etc etc etc Give these proven players some credit at least You talk about huge wages (forget the favourite club rubbish) and then mention Chelsea / ManCity / Barcelona etc..

Then think of how easy it is for Arsenal to sign almost anyone from this vast market place, with the exception of a small percentage that command huge wages.

If you get into his favourites club, you earn huge wages and get lots of football even if you're not that good.

I remind you that ten years ago he scored a hat trick in an England away game but he settled, through weak character and weak body and huge undeserved wages, for a squad place and to stay at a well known club which has no real ambition to challenge at the top strata of PL and CL.

Yes let him eat the huge wages of 90k a week for nothing.

We still, have tons of deadwood which Wenger hoards and wates huge wages on altogether.

Some people may have noticed, if they are astute, (sarcasm) that I have been trying to get Walcott out of our club for a full decade (out of the 12 wasted years he has been shirking on the pitch and conning huge wages for nothing in return) Yet still this idler remains, uselessly, miles from the first eleven and picking up # 110,000 pw.

I haven't changed my stance once in the last 4 to 5 years and I am glad to Welcome t Lacazette and if he can even produce 75 % of the goals scored in the French league, he will be a huge bonus and it appears a true CF.We hopefully are still in the market for Mahrez as in all probability we wont let Sanchez run down his contract and walk away on a free, as that is not the Arsenal way.We need to sell several players and it's the saving of wages that is most important not what we get and a decision has to be made on particularly Wilshere and it looks like the player we arguably missed the most last season Santi Cazorla maybe coming to the end of his playing days.We have already tried to sell Gibbs and Jenkinson and in all probability add the two keepers, Ospina and Szczesny to the list which leaves Joel Campbell who seems to have missed his chance and should have been sold at a premium after the last WC, but more importantly The Ox and Giroud.Our attack force needs a real hard think as I can't see Perez as a long term Arsenal player, but Walcott, like him or not in all probability will stay.

I'm not sure about the finances of such a deal but his wages aren't huge and I don't think Chelsea would demand a huge transfer fee.

According to The Sun, if Chelsea or Manchester City were to move for the 27 - year - old, he would cost a huge # 500million in total - taking into account the price of the transfer fee and wages.

He pays huge wages for players of dubious value or even throws away the little transfer budget he's given on terrible buys like Matri (paid as much as Juventus got Tevez for), moves like Torres or other fake players presented to us as if they were champions.

Neither of these players were due to play Champions League football this season, so with a huge increase in wages, they both saw it as a massive step up to come to Man Utd.