Sentences with phrase «of human cloning»

In this case, an error will be the birth of a human clone with any deviations.

The panel was brought together by the US National Academy of Sciences for a report exploring the use of human cloning in basic science and medicine, such as the creation of tissues for transplant.

I will continue to push for a ban on all forms of human cloning, a practice that demeans the dignity of the human person.

The possibility of human cloning is striking only because it breaks the connection so emphatically.

The essays focus primarily on the issue of human cloning, but some give some attention to animal cloning as well.

Some bioethicists have called for a new international ban that would clearly prohibit the implantation of a human clone in part because of the tantalizing research uses for nascent embryos.

As pointed out at the time, this was in contradiction to statements he had made previously, inwhich he had repudiated the idea of human cloning: «Human cloning has grabbed people's imagination, but that is merely a diversion — and one we personally regret, and find distasteful,» he had said in The Second Creation, the book on Dolly's cloning which he co-authored with embryologist Kenneth Campbell in 2002.

Dr Patrick Dixon, a writer on the ethics of human cloning, said the nature of Dolly's death would have a huge impact on possibility of producing a cloned human baby.

These questions are, as you know, at the heart of many problems in our society today, and it is against the background of such questions that I want to reflect upon the significance of human cloning.

• Canada's Defense Department has issued a paper condemning the use of human clones for military purposes and calling for an international treaty to ban any attempts toward that end.

Proponents of human cloning assert that this is the only method of producing pluripotent stem cells with the same genetic make - up as adult patients.

In 2001, this same concern for defending victims led her to appear before a House subcommittee to argue for the prohibition of human cloning.

What of human cloning?

Regarding the spectres of human cloning and the like, public opposition can be generally put down to the «yuk factor»: a gut reaction that as such is basically healthy.

At the same time, we encourage continuing open and inclusive public dialogue, in which the scientific community is an active participant, on the scientific and ethical aspects of human cloning as our understanding of this technology advances.

If the American public had not yet heard of human cloning or ACT by the fall of 2001, it could hardly have missed the hype that began on 25 November that year.

There was a larger ideology here, I sensed, reeling away in muted horror, a sort of pan-Twinism that would, if greatly magnified by the advent of human cloning, possibly postpone its internecine bloodbath until it had dealt with the rest of us.

But then we're not twins, or clones — and surely this, the Love Factor, is a term that's conspicuously missing from our modern debate over the ethics and wisdom of human cloning.

On the question of human cloning, rather surprisingly, the respondents expressed somewhat stronger opposition to the cloning of human embryos for research than to cloning for reproduction.

The prospect of gameteless reproduction not only makes even more pressing the ongoing debate about the morality and legality of human cloning, but also raises moral and legal questions that are not widely known and discussed, even among the staunchest opponents of ESCR.

John Gearhart, one of the first scientists to isolate, in 1998, human embryonic stem cells, also downplayed the therapeutic value of human cloning, saying «the more we learn about reprogramming, the more I think IPS will be the one of choice.»

This primer on cloning examines the nature and purpose of human cloning in light of recent developments in stem cell technology.

The paper points out that all cloning is reproductive and reflects on the immediate outcome of human cloning — a human embryo — while examining the terminology used by cloning advocates to obscure the facts.

But it also prompted a long - running argument over the ethics of cloning, reaching further levels with the latest allegations of human cloning.

I thought it was a very interesting look into the consequences of human cloning and all that scientific mumbo - jumbo.

The Boys From Brazil (1978) circulated the concept of human cloning with its pulpy story of a Nazi conspiracy to replicate Hitler.

No doubt that the ethical, theological, and philosophical questions engendered by the prospect of human cloning are the stuff of heated debate and interesting conundrums.

Most of them have supported the creation of laws that prohibit any type of human cloning.

The United States and its allies said they would only support a measure that banned all forms of human cloning.

While hardly the most important issue then, the possibility of human cloning was debated during the «60s.

The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) recognizes the intense debates within our society on the issue of human cloning.

Many Christians resist the idea of human cloning.

That is because Never Let Me Go isn't about the ethics of human cloning or anything like that all.

And is it so certain that the public would want a ban on every use of human cloning?

Given the history of medical experimentation and the lack of access to medical resources for certain groups of people, we must be especially concerned that women, racial and ethnic minorities, prisoners, and the poor are not exploited as a result of this research or of human cloning itself.

However, her basic premise, that genetically identical twins might be able to shed some light on the issue of human cloning, struck me as a very solid one.

The ethical aspects of reprogramming, especially the possibility of human cloning, were more widely debated, even in the US Congress.

Creating, against all conventions on the use of human clones, the manipulants, shapeshifters.