Sentences with phrase «of human fetuses»

The LPA receptor is expressed in the brain of human fetuses, just as in mice, and in the same types of neural progenitor cells.

According to studies, baby crying, a previously unknown behavioral state of human fetuses, is an expression of displeasure and can occur as early as 28th week of pregnancy.

If one considers cloning, the storing of human fetuses for research purposes and organ harvesting, and the whole field of genetic manipulation, no one can fail to have noticed the slow erosion of human dignity that threatens us.

Thats right folks, the right to life candidate was making money off the disposal of human fetuses.

Therefore, let us imagine the universe after the example of a human fetus in the womb which is therefore tending toward rebirth.

The legal issues and factual background of Stenberg forced each Justice to confront the raw facts of precisely how abortion brings about the destruction of the human fetus.

Whether BPA, also found in epoxy coatings in canned food, can hurt the development of a human fetus or a baby is still unclear.

But can BPA hurt the development of a human fetus or a baby?

A micrograph shows isolated neurons from the brain of a human fetus.

The only way the team can be sure they have grown the equivalent of a fetal brain would be to genetically test individual cells from different regions of the organoid, and compare them to those of human fetus, says Christof Koch at the Allen Institute for Brain Science in Seattle.

Colored regions in these MRI images of a human fetus (shown from two perspectives) indicate brain regions where connectivity grows stronger between the 20th and 40th weeks of gestation.

Not exact matches

Their answer to your question, I suspect, would be that society should limit the exercise of free will when it is harmful to other human beings, including (they would assert) a fetus.

The world can not know the unsurpassable worth of human life without a people who consistently work to protect it - in the fetus, in the convict, in the immigrant, in the soldier, and in the enemy.

Definition of fetus -LCB- IS -RCB- An unborn or unhatched offspring of a mammal, in particular an unborn human baby more than eight weeks after conception.

A human fetus goes through the entire evolutionary process in 9 months, from simple multi-cellular life, through amphibian (some children are born with webbing still between their fingers and toes, like a frog), through mammalia and primates (we even have tails, of which the coccyx is a remainder).

Is the human intellectual concept of personhood applied to an anencephelic fetus, and which ones with all the various genetic variations of the condition where the fetus has no brain, or part of a brain?

Actually, the fetus has the potential of becoming a human being but it's not a set thing.

At Psalms 139, the man David was inspired to write that «your (God's) eyes saw even the embryo (comprising 56 days) of me, and in your book all its (the human body) parts were down in writing (our DNA), as regards the days when they were not formed (before becoming a fetus), and there was not yet one (complete organ) among them.»

If quickening corresponds to the emergence of a unified experience in the fetus, then it is an important stage in the movement toward human personhood.

They say further that even if one does not equate a fetus with a child, as long as one attributes some value to the fetus» and they demonstrate how economists routinely make such outrageous calculations in insurance claims for loss of body parts» and put the value as low as one hundredth of a human being, the lowered crime rate would not come near justifying the number of abortions.

They probably wanted to redefine «person» so that they could weasel their way into applying the rights we have as living breathing human beings to clusters of cells (fetus) not viable outside the uterus.

Which means that the fetus, which has all of the organs, including gender specific organs, is also the continuation of human life.

The argument that life begins at conception is absurd in that what should be said is parasitic life begins at conception, actual human life only becomes a valid argument when the fetus is able to live outside the womb, prior to that the life is basically in the hands of the host — mother.

Because the nature of being human is to be in relation, to affect and to be affected by others, the unborn fetus can not be considered fully and properly a human being.

Pro-life folk honestly believe that the fetus growing in the womb is a real, unique, human life, and the idea of killing a baby is totally appalling.

The legal definition of murder is: «The unlawful killing of a human being or fetus with malice aforethought.»

To some, the human fetus (Latin for «unborn child») is a mass of protoplasm which has no personal rights.

If they developed artificial wombs, that were capable of gestating a human fetus, or if we developed the ability to transplant a fetus from one woman to another, those would be analagous, and would present other options instead of abortion.

Because when I search «fetus» Google returns «An unborn or unhatched offspring of a mammal, in particular an unborn human baby more than eight weeks after conception.»

Now, my question becomes, is the reason for the delineation so that we don't get into arguments about whether a fetus is a person, or are we saying that a fetus is not a human being but we want it included in the definition of the law?

«The unlawful killing of a human being or fetus with malice aforethought.»

Since a fetus is a human being, deliberate abortion is also an unwarranted taking of life.

Is it even conceivable that we would remove his life - support system on the ground that his existence, like that of the fetus, is highly inconvenient to us and that he does not look human at the moment?

Those who are offended by the claim that horses or chimps or whales (OFD; also see OOTM 13, WM 49) deserve more respect than the fetus in the early stages of pregnancy usually resort to a type of question - begging which Peter Singer calls «speciesism»: the human fetus in the early stages of pregnancy deserves moral respect just because it is human.

For a summary of some of the scientific research which supports the view that the fetus is not a prepackaged human being (e.g., even something so relatively simple as a fingerprint arises at least in part due to chance events not present in a fertilized egg) see Charles Gardner, «Is an Embryo a Person?

Q2 «Fetus is made of human cells and has a independent heart (however primitive)?

The human fetus in the earliest stages of its development, when it is virtually incapable of morphological definition, is a case in point.

Defense attorney Sally Hoelzel takes a different line: «My contention is that at the time of the alleged acts of my client, the fetus was not a human being and could not be a victim.»

I did make the point that life begins at conception, and that there is no ground of principle on which the embryo or fetus could be regarded as anything less than human at any stage of its existence.

Lots of them do believe that the fetus is a human being.

«a fetus / embryo / blastocyst / baby (all of the four are the same) is proven to be a living unique human being who is not physically harming his / her mother.»

Whether it's a victim of human trafficking or the bloody remains of an aborted fetus, grisly illustrations leave us feeling burdened by a problem that seems too big and that we're too small to be able to help.

So if it is YES to all four questions then a fetus / embryo / blastocyst / baby (all of the four are the same) is proven to be a living unique human being who is not physically harming his / her mother.

If you are absolutely convinced a fetus is truly the full moral equivalent of an extant human baby, then any political or ideological qualms you have about helping out with things like birth control and child care, or including se - x education in school classrooms.

I agree, and when the medical community clarifies when a fetus is given the classification of human being, then we will have a true cut off point for abortions.

Q3 Is there any human being outside the womb who has exactly the same DNA as the cells in the set of fetuses / embryos in a given uterus?

they are too into themselves to take care of another person... look out for number one... that's what they do... so sad when people reduce the human baby (ok fetus) to nothing but a pest and an annoyance to another persons life

Q3 Is it true that there isnt any human being outside the womb who has exactly the same DNA as the cells in the set of fetuses / embryos in a given uterus?

its never a «potential» human as many of you say... a kidney is a bodily organ and nothing more... thus to compare it to a fetus is idiocy and a desperation to try to justify killing the unborn

We must take care to explain the medical and scientific fact that embryos and fetuses are human beings and the necessity of recognizing the intrinsic value of all human life.