Sentences with phrase «of human fossil»

A tell - tale signature of human fossil fuel emissions is the large fraction of CO2 being driven into the oceans.

«This is in direct opposition to the IPCC's contention that global warming is accelerating, and supports arguments that the amount of warming that will occur over the remainder of the 21st century as a result of human fossil fuel usage will be at the low end of the IPCC projections, or even lower,» the two scientists added.

This is in direct opposition to the IPCC's contention that global warming is accelerating, and supports arguments that the amount of warming that will occur over the remainder of the 21st century as a result of human fossil fuel usage will be at the low end of the IPCC projections, or even lower.

is written to cast doubt on the evolutionary interpretation of the human fossil record.

His understanding of evolutionary theory is flawed, his knowledge of the human fossil record is superficial, he ignores or defines away data which does not support his ideas, and even some of the evidence he cites in his support is so badly misrepresented that it contradicts his claims instead of supporting them.

Quam also said that with the discovery of the Aroeria skull, the anatomical diversity of human fossil records of that time have increased to a great extent.

Paleontologists are overly possessive of human fossils.

The bones account for most of the human fossils ever discovered from the Middle Pleistocene, the period 120,000 to 780,000 years ago during which modern humans, Neanderthals and Denisovans split into distinct lineages.

Recent studies of human fossils suggest the brain shrank more quickly than the body in near - modern times.

Owing to the scarcity of human fossils from this period, these ancestors of all present - day non-African modern populations remain largely enigmatic.

One climate doomsday scenario (among many) that continues to have no basis in climate science reality is the infamous prediction that Gaia will soon have a Venus - like atmosphere and boiling oceans... because of humans fossil fuel use.

Not exact matches

Scientists studying the aftermath of a massive coal - ash spill in North Carolina have discovered a byproduct of the fossil fuel that may pose human health risks.

After CT scans in 2011, the fossils pushed estimates of the earliest human habitation on the West Coast back by 800 years (to about 13,800 years before present day).

A known sceptic of human - induced climate change, advocate of fossil fuels, and critic of several government - run climate programs, the ex governor of Texas» nomination have many involved parties worried.

He's going to placeholdercolonize Mars, save Puerto Rico, free us from dependence on fossil fuels, redefine high - speed transportation, and ensure human beings can survive in the age of artificial intelligence.

Whether it was answers to the body and movement of water, the mechanics of the human heart and body, the motion of the planets or to discover why birds fly, or how the human eye perceives light and distant images, or why fossils are found on mountains, his quest for knowledge was extraordinary.

The representatives from Harford County Climate Action made it clear — human activity, primarily the burning of fossil fuels, has had a clear and measurable impact on the Earth's climate over the last century, and those actions have put low - lying areas of Harford County in danger from rising sea levels.

The president of Kinder Morgan Canada, Ian Anderson, recently claimed he is not smart enough to know whether human activity — i.e. the fossil fuel industry — causes climate change.

Rick, we have fossils from different human species over the periods of millions of years and they gradually become more and more like what we're like today.

Brand New New fossils bringing «Hobbit humans» to life New bones attributed to Ho - mo floresiensis — aka the «Hobbit Human» — along with other recent findings, are helping to reveal what members of this species looked like, how they behaved and their origins.

We have extensive fossil records of humans over millions of years.

Then, given your clearly profound understanding of the relevant science, you can explain how humans came to possess a defunct gene for egg - yolk proteins in our placental mammal genomes and why the presence of this dead gene and the mutations rendering it defunct map to the lineages observable in the fossil record?

The current rate of burning fossil fuels adds about 2 ppm per year to the atmosphere, so that getting from the current level to 1000 ppm would take about 300 years — and 1000 ppm is still less than what most plants would prefer, and much less than either the nasa or the Navy limit for human beings.

Aug. 30, 2012: The genome of a recently discovered branch of extinct humans known as the Denisovans that once interbred with us has been sequenced Anyone find fossils of Adam and Eve yet?

Furthermore, some substitution of human labor for fossil fuels absorbs unemployed workers.

It seems that only in a community that has some control over its own economic life can there be freedom to decide about the respective roles of human labor and fossil energy.

Such a plan could enable businesses to make their own plans knowing what the relative costs of fossil fuels, solar energy, and human labor are likely to be over time.

Cheap fossil fuel has turned us into the first people in human history who have essentially no need of each other — a kind of hyperindividualism has replaced community.

Of course, we may be wrong to think that we truly remembered those long - lost almost - humans: Perhaps instead they were only speculative imaginings to explain old bones and arrowheads, fossils and mysterious cave paintings — just as our own stories about Neanderthals are also, mostly, fantasies.

If you hold that no human death came before sinfulness, then it depends on what you call human (there is a gradation of forms leading up to the modern human skeleton in the fossil record, as well as the overwhelming genetic evidence that we arose through an evolutionary process) and what you consider sin (i.e. when did we become accountable to God for our actions?).

This view holds that the entire cosmos is around 6,000 years old, that the fossil record was laid down almost in its entirety during a literal, global worldwide flood, that God created humans directly out of dust, and that Adam and Eve are the progenitors of the entire human race.

Then there were the numerous articles on how Scientist found a new fossil of the oldest human and they were off by Millions of years.

«Every single human being who walks on the face of the earth has a lense that they view the world through... Since Evolution / Atheism denies the existence of God and the biblical account of creation, they have to make sense of the fossil record and geologic formations somehow.»

As a Christian, I absolutely believe God began the human race in the Garden of Eden... as a discerning intelligent human being, I can not deny the facts found in carbon dating studies of ancient fossil remains... if God can creat man, he can also allow for investigation and confirmation of planet plant and animal life, the upheaval of mountains, and history of the sea.

We can trace the human lineage back through time via the fossil record, but interestingly, the Bible never mentions any of these non-H.

Repeatable in science refers to the ability to test the same hypothesis, using the same methods (typically by independent researchers), to confirm or reject said hypothesis, e.g. the repeated observation by many, many different researchers of fossils in the correct temporal and morphological relationships within the fossil record (no rabbits in the pre-Cambrian, no humans alongside dinosaurs, etc).

Again and again, Wright asserts that there is no fossil evidence of intermediate forms between earlier primates and human beings; and, again and again, Dawkins attempts to disabuse her of this vacuous «mantra» (as he calls it) by pointing out that there certainly is such evidence and by directing her to it, but all to no avail.

Again, the observation of a rabbit fossil in pre-Cambrian strata, human fossils alongside dinosaurs, a true chimera, or the direct observation of an organism ex nihilo would undermine evolution.

So you refuse to believe in the solid evidence of millions of years of bone fossils showing that all species, including humans, have evolved... and instead you choose to believe a book written a thousand years ago by a group men just trying to teach a few morals?

All available evidence supports the Theory of Evolution: biochemical evidence such as Cytochrome - C, fossil evidence such as Tiktaalik, Ambulocetus, Archeopteryx, etc, biogeographical evidence such as marsupials, penguins, etc. and genetic evidence such as ERVs, Human Chromosome 2, etc. just to name a few.

With this organization and substitution of fossil for animal and human energy, it vastly increased the amount that could be produced per man - hour of work.

Though «human evolution» is a theory, considering the fossils and evidence of proto - human beings, it is far more likely that we evolved from a lesser developed ancestor than it is that we were made out of dirt by a supernatural deity.

However we have zero fossil evidence of humans to back up Darwin's nice theoretical drawing.

@blue: actually there is plenty of evidence for human evolution (in the form of fossils, genetics, geology, you name it).

Has nothing to do with actual fossils that demonstrate an evolution of a single species over time; whether dogs, cats, monkeys, birds, or humans.

This is how much care God took in creating the Earth — He included an amazing diversity of fossils representing ancient humans and other creatures that never existed, just to keep us guessing.

Direct Dating of Cretaceous — Jurassic Fossils (and other evidence for Human - COEXISTENCE) By Robert Garbe, Hugh Miller, John Whitmore, Goorge Detwiller, Doug Wilder, Frank Vosler, John Ditmars, D Davis.

I went to the Answers in Genesis Web site and found an article about how these recent findings «should in no way faze creationists» because «the fossil does not resemble a human skeleton,» because it «was found in two parts,» and because the fossil's lack of a grooming claw and toothcomb «are easily explained by variation with a kind.»

This divergence continues as we get further away from humans and it is EXACTLY consistent with the fossil record and is EXACTLY what we would expect to see if life gradually evolved on Earth over billions of years.

Creationist «well, what about the origin of the universe, the fact that the universe obeys laws, the origins of life on this earth, the fact that the largest «gaps» in the fossil record correspond exactly with the organisms identified in the bible as being created by God, namely fish, birds, land animals and humans»