If he meant only that the «increase in CO2» was «all» a result
of human industrial activity, then the paragraph is poorly written.
But, that's one of the hallmarks
of human industrial activity: sustained emissions.
These are just a few obvious examples, but because the future Fox News pundit was talking about climate change let's consider something that is indisputable: the measured rise of carbon dioxide in the earth's atmosphere is numerically consistent with that predicted from the output
of human industrial activity.
Not exact matches
The extension
of Calvinism to all spheres
of human activity was extremely important to a world emerging from an agrarian mediaeval economy into a commercial
industrial era.
They have been going on for millions
of years without much perturbation until
humans began to alter the cycle through
industrial activity.
The greatest
human influence on the sulfur cycle comes from
industrial activity, mainly the combustion
of coal and oil and the smelting
of sulfur - bearing metallic ores.
More than 100 years later, an international team
of scientists that includes a NASA researcher has proven that air pollution from
industrial activities arrived to the planet's southern pole long before any
human.
That is why we can find the so - called technofossils or traces
of human activity on the beaches, in this case the
industrial waste
of international companies which helps to calculate the age
of the beachrock.»
Human activities, such as
industrial production, transport, power generation, and wood burning emit large amounts
of tiny pollutant particles containing, for example, soot and sulfate, into the atmosphere.
Emissions from vehicles, power plants,
industrial operations, and other
human activities are a primary cause
of surface ozone, which is one
of six main pollutants regulated in the U.S. by the Clean Air Act.
The researchers also separated out natural sources
of VSLS — such as seaweed in the ocean — and those released due to
human activity — such as
industrial processes — in order to determine the relative importance
of each.
The lake and adjacent bog record some 8,000 years
of human activity in the vicinity, from the advent
of farming millennia ago to the
industrial revolution, and remains largely unchanged throughout its history But in the last 50 years, «everything changes,» Swindles says.
According to the study, the encroachment
of human and
industrial activity can have catastrophic effects.
With over 80 percent
of forests already degraded by
human and
industrial activities, today's findings underscore the immediate need for international policies to secure remaining intact forests — including establishing new protected areas, securing the land rights
of indigenous peoples, regulating industry and hunting, and targeting restoration efforts and public finance.
Next, Doney (p. 1512) reviews how the chemistry
of the oceans is changing, mostly due to
human fossil fuel combustion, fertilizer use, and
industrial activity.
Most scientific literature holds that the Anthropocene, the period
of human activities influencing the environment, began with the
industrial era in the 1700s, explains Hodder.
At present, the ocean takes up a quarter
of the CO2 - released to the atmosphere by
human industrial activities — with long - lasting consequences for the chemical composition
of seawater and marine habitats.
Man - made include
human - generated changes to the water table, including dam construction, and
industrial activities involving the injection or removal
of fluids from the subsurface.
There is a broad scientific consensus that
human activity — including the burning
of fossil fuels for transportation, heating and
industrial manufacturing — is driving recent climate change.
Increases in concentrations
of these gases since 1750 are due to
human activities in the
industrial era.
We know with certainty that the increase in CO2 concentrations since the
industrial revolution is caused by
human activities because the isotopes
of carbon show that it comes from fossil fuel burning and the clearing
of forests.
The concentration
of atmospheric CO2 has increased dramatically since the
Industrial Revolution (from around 280 parts per million [ppm] in preindustrial times to 401 ppm in 2015), primarily due to
human activities such as the burning
of fossil fuels and changes in land - use.
William Ruddiman has proposed the early anthropocene hypothesis, according to which the anthropocene era, as some people call the most recent period in the Earth's history when the
activities of the
human race first began to have a significant global impact on the Earth's climate and ecosystems, did not begin in the eighteenth century with the advent
of the
Industrial Era, but dates back to 8000 years ago, due to intense farming
activities of our early agrarian ancestors.
Human industrial activity may also prove to be visible in the geological record in the form
of long - lived synthetic molecules from plastics and other products, or radioactive fallout from nuclear weapons.
Edward Burtynsky is a Canadian photographer whose many projects show the effects
of human, especially
industrial,
activity, on the environment across the globe, in the cities as well as in the countryside.
And it may reflect more changes than we realize: recent writing on the Anthropocene period that arguably began during the
Industrial Revolution highlights the significant global impact
of human activities on Earth's ecosystems.
Kazma's oeuvre constitutes a kind
of archive
of human activity, raising fundamental questions about it in the economic,
industrial, scientific, medical, social and artistic spheres.
3) In order to assert
human causation, I would think the data would have to show that, for example, Rocky Mountain National Park had continued unabated to the present day the cooling trend established from approximately 1750 through 1850, while the Houston Ship Channel area exhibited the warming trend since the onset
of industrial activity.
«although the oceans presently take up about one - fourth
of the excess CO2
human activities put into the air, that fraction was significantly larger at the beginning
of the
Industrial Revolution.»
Since
human population and
industrial activity have risen at the same time, it stands to reason that
human activity is, one way or another, the cause
of this observed warming.
Most
of these perturbations, tied either directly or indirectly to
human fossil fuel combustion, fertilizer use, and
industrial activity, are projected to grow in coming decades, resulting in increasing negative impacts on ocean biota and marine resources.
You and you alone can «re-center» our national debate on issues like the unsustainability
of increasing conspicuous per -
human over-consumption
of limited resources; the unsustainability
of skyrocketing absolute global
human population numbers; and the soon to become patently unsustainable, seemingly endless growth
of large - scale
industrial / corporate
activities, now threatening to engulf the surface
of the planetary home God has blessed us to inhabit and, I suppose, not to overwhelm.
Since the beginning
of the
industrial age, 30 % to 60 %
of the coral reefs on the planet have disappeared because
of human activity and warming oceans.
In the meantime, it gives clear insights into what scientists see happening to the planet's climate as
human industrial activities, as well as land - use changes, pump increasing amounts
of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the air.
Whether the cause is
human activity or natural variability — and the preponderance
of evidence says it's
humans — thermometer readings all around the world have risen steadily since the beginning
of the
Industrial Revolution.
Rob — I'm not sure why you think the
human origin
of post-
industrial CO2 increases is a subject
of much uncertainty, since the conclusion resides in the convergence
of multiple lines
of evidence that include measurements
of C14, C13, C12, atmospheric oxygen, volcanic
activity, and records
of industrial emissions.
It is vital for
human and ecosystem health, the production
of energy and food,
industrial and commercial
activities, and maintaining healthy and vibrant communities.
«There is convincing evidence that since the
industrial revolution,
human activities, resulting in increasing concentrations
of greenhouse gases and other trace constituents in the atmosphere, have become a major agent
of climate change.»
But even if you choose to doubt them, it is really the first seven that, combined, point to
human activities as the only explanation
of rising global temperatures since the
Industrial Revolution, and the subsequent climate changes (such as ice melt and sea level rise) that have occurred due to this global warming.
For about two decades, the vast majority
of climate scientists have agreed that
human industrial activity is forcing the planet to warm.
IPCC AR5 summarizes the scientific literature and estimates that cumulative carbon dioxide emissions related to
human activities need to be limited to 1 trillion tonnes C (1000 PgC) since the beginning
of the
industrial revolution if we are to have a likely chance
of limiting warming to 2 °C.
The enhanced Greenhouse Effect we are now measuring is a
human fingerprint because the source
of it is the continued emission
of greenhouse gases, primarily carbon dioxide, produced by
industrial activity.
The oceans are currently warming because
of the extra greenhouse gases that
human industrial activity has added to the atmosphere.
Since the
Industrial Revolution, carbon dioxide from
human activities has created a greenhouse effect
of 1.66 W per square metre worldwide.
Or a self - serving political organization that never hesitates to misrepresent the real world in favor
of its remit: to blame
human industrial activity for imaginary problems?
«Surface temperature reconstructions for periods prior to the
industrial era are only one
of multiple lines
of evidence supporting the conclusion that climatic warming is occurring in response to
human activities, and they are not the primary evidence.»
But although change in that vast watershed
of western US and Mexico called the Great Basin is contemporaneous with the
Industrial Revolution, and the rise
of carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere, other
human activities may have triggered the dramatic alteration.
These chemicals are released by a wide variety
of human activity in the
industrial world, from driving cars to treating sewage.
Lacis expressly rejects the IPCC's use
of the word a «substantial» factor, and argues: «Based on this basic input data, the relevant physics is inescapably clear that the increase in atmospheric CO2 is indeed enhancing the strength
of the terrestrial greenhouse effect, and thus causing global warming to happen — all directly attributable to
human industrial activity.»
Based on this basic input data, the relevant physics is inescapably clear that the increase in atmospheric CO2 is indeed enhancing the strength
of the terrestrial greenhouse effect, and thus causing global warming to happen — all directly attributable to
human industrial activity.