The mercy seat reminds us that a profound awareness
of human sinfulness was characteristic of even the «priestly» strand of Israel's tradition.
The reality
of human sinfulness means that the instruments we intend to use for good are certain to be turned to evil purposes as well.
Because
of human sinfulness, the world needs to be put to rights again and its original purpose taken forward to completion.
A second, and all are closely interlinked and interdependent, the nature
of human sinfulness, interpreted always in part against the presuppositions of the creation faith.
It uncovers the lostness of the world, the magnitude
of human sinfulness, the tragedy of human alienation.
The continual unmasking
of human sinfulness does nothing to enhance our respect for an underlying goodness in human nature; rather it panders to our own deep inadequacies.
Such a rejection is not uncommon in modern theology, but it overlooks the significance
of human sinfulness as responsible action, an action that even God takes seriously.
The welfare state, in their opinion, does not take adequate account
of human sinfulness.
All such theories grapple with the fact
of human sinfulness as the primary, disruptive element in the relationship between us and God.
The fuller meaning of revelation can be understood, therefore, only if we take into account the fact
of a human sinfulness that has continually resisted the freedom, extravagance, and surprisingness of the divine self - promise.
To assume that we could have such a chart is to presume too much: it is to be guilty of that libido sciendi «lust for knowing», which Jacques Maritain quite rightly has condemned as one of the worst manifestations
of human sinfulness.
Jewish and Christian resistance to utopianism rests upon bitter historical lessons about the weight
of human sinfulness.
The experienced fact
of human sinfulness and the promise of salvation through the unmerited forgiveness of sin have placed much emphasis on divine judgment in traditional Christian thinking.
«Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely» is not a biblical phrase, but it arises from a biblical understanding
of human sinfulness.
She further argues that the fact
of human sinfulness makes it necessary to have coercive measures at national and international level to prevent tax evasion and restrain tax avoidance.
Not exact matches
Unfortunately in my case, I've probably gone to excess the other way... after 43 years
of being (in my view) threatened with hellfire for every cotton - picking thing (including the «
sinfulness»
of being born in the first place because it's a well - known scriptural fact that every
human is born sinful and separated from G - d, with a heart that does nothing but desire evil and no way to please G - d even when righteous), threatened with being «left behind» in the rapture (should I fail on some doctrinal (belief) point at the crucial moment)... I refuse to consider ANY possibility
of hell at all.
Human sinfulness and self - interest will find ways to express themselves even in the best - intentioned efforts to remedy the defects
of the marketplace.
Generally, they include the following in their gospel definition: -
human sinfulness - the deity
of Jesus - the death
of Jesus on the cross for our sins - the resurrection
of Jesus - the necessity
of faith in Jesus to receive eternal life
Sinfulness, personal or corporate, is but a matter
of maladjustment that can be cured through some minor psychological or sociological tinkering — I'm O.K. and you're O.K. and the Department
of Health and
Human Services will make our community a nice place to live.
Moreover, although Eastern Orthodoxy takes exception to the doctrine, it STILL maintains the
sinfulness of humanity and would STILL maintain that
human beings are sinful and therefore evil.
For given not only the
sinfulness but also the limitations
of human beings, there will always be a difference between the official morality proclaimed by the Church and that which is practiced by the average Christian.
If you hold that no
human death came before
sinfulness, then it depends on what you call
human (there is a gradation
of forms leading up to the modern
human skeleton in the fossil record, as well as the overwhelming genetic evidence that we arose through an evolutionary process) and what you consider sin (i.e. when did we become accountable to God for our actions?).
The best way to bring the
sinfulness of such sins home to us is to point toward the places where
humans in fact act wrongly: in home, school, business, contacts with others, and the like, where by pride, self - seeking, neglect
of our neighbors, ugliness
of behavior in our homes, and so much else, we often behave in a reprehensible manner or we subtly and insidiously treat other persons as mere «things.»
The capacity to speak, symbolized by the physical tongue, is the primary way through which we
human beings express ourselves, and nothing reveals more deeply the biblical insight into the
sinfulness and brokenness
of human life than our verbal means
of self - expression.
For Kierkegaard the recognition
of one's
sinfulness is only made possible by the reality
of God's judgement; it is not an autonomous
human possibility.
In the language
of The Concept
of Anxiety, she only sees the «quantitative determinations»
of sinfulness in
human history, without seeing the «qualitative leap into sin,» which is
human evasion
of God in the present moment in time.
Human sinfulness prevents persons from acknowledging the lordship
of Christ and the transcendence
of God.
I am sorry to say this after Thomas Martin Cothran's expressed nervousness about my comparisons
of Catholic social thought and the social thought
of the American founders: The Americans» persistent emphasis on
human sinfulness seems to me more in touch with
human experience than does papal social thought since 1891.
Yet in stressing man's permeating
sinfulness it often seems to give a too pessimistic view
of human nature, with too little recognition
of the God - given capacity
of some persons to live victorious and highly virtuous Christian lives.
(1) Justification points to the source
of motive and morale for ethical living amidst the
sinfulness of the
human situation; it permits the Christian to participate in struggles for justice without making the struggle the norm.
They regard the
human aspect - the obvious failures and frequent
sinfulness of her members - and think that it must surely spell the end.
The Faith and Order statement then went on to point out how every social order is limited by the «continuing
sinfulness of man» which are meant to protect
human beings in society.
A theology
of redemption combines affirmation
of human creativity in the purpose
of God and deliverance from
human sinfulness to release
humans for their vocation
of cooperation with God in continuous new creativity.
The central issue in the early debates between Fundamentalists and Modernists was on the question whether the gospel should emphasize as the essence
of the gospel, deliverance
of the
humans from
sinfulness or affirmation
of the
human vocation to creativity and cooperation with God in recreating nature and society according to the purpose
of God.
But Macquarrie, like many theologians writing today, would be far clearer than Kübler - Ross that death, whatever else it is, is a part
of the
human condition
of sinfulness.
Now Christian care means helping to overcome
human sinfulness by the grace
of God.
But to love is to be responsible, and
human history is lived out under the conditions
of the
sinfulness of man.
Deep - seated and inveterate,
sinfulness was now regarded as so essentially a part
of human nature that no mere forgiveness
of transgressions could salve its evil or volitional amendment undo its harm.
But one can take full account
of the
sinfulness of human institutions without concluding that participation in them necessarily implies sin.
The basis
of the Christian contribution is the faith that the crucified Jesus Christ by mediating divine forgiveness to all
humans in the solidarity
of their
sinfulness, has made possible mutual forgiveness between persons and peoples and has brought into being in history a new
human communion (Koinonia), transcending all religious, cultural and natural diversities and divisions.
If the person you are talking to seems to believe that they don't need to believe in Jesus because they are good enough people on their own, you might want to present some
of the preparation truths about the holiness
of God and our own
human sinfulness.
There can be a realistic pacifism, a pacifism that gives due weight to the
sinfulness and perversity
of human nature.