Alternatingly playful and elegiac, musical and imagistic, this long - awaited second full - length collection by Katz addresses the limits
of human understanding by examining the aftereffects of history and the complexities of parenthood.
Not exact matches
These newest results boost the case
of the those who argue that immersing yourself in a fictional world populated
by layered, complex characters can't help but increase your
understanding of how the
human mind works and make your fellow
humans a little less strange to you.
The (until now) uniquely
human ability to
understand the complexities
of language, multiplied
by the speed
of computational efficiency, results in a very effective response program.
This approach begins
by using tools like advanced
human genetics to unravel the complexities
of disease and
understand the fundamentals
of human biology.
To make sense
of this, it's important for designers
of those solutions to know how to take
human interactions (emails, chats, phone calls, social media threads) and tag them,
by identifying emotion and sentiment, and other markers so the computer «
understands»
humans better.
By gathering a strong
understanding of how this technology is evolving, giving it all the information you have about your products and services, having a
human touch to back it up, and learning from all the data you gather, you'll be able to provide your customers with great support while staying one step ahead
of your competition.
And I believe
understanding this element
of human nature — which I'll discuss in the next section — is key to building a life that: a) involves ambitious striving toward goals and having impact in the world, which contributes to a sense
of meaning, and b) gives you a shot at realizing true happiness
by avoiding a soul - sucking competitive rat race.
In the right set
of circumstances, many multiples
of that amount could incrementally flow into gold, a simple product that has been innately
understood for millennia
by human beings all over the globe.
Understanding that
by nature,
humans will often walk away from a system that is overly complex, modern brokers do an excellent job
of supplying interfaces that are straightforward and user - friendly.
Lots
of important social interactions are happening online and being captured
by social media companies; the only way to
understand certain elements
of human behavior is with these partnerships.»
It's nice to put a face to the name and see who the
human on the other side
of the phone or computer screen actually is — just make sure that your employees
understand that
by using their personal accounts to share company content and interact professionally, they need to remember that everything they post is a reflection on the company.
Yandex could also improve its commitments to users» privacy
by clarifying its handling
of user information, and giving users clear options to control what information the company collects and shares, and for how long it retains it, so that people can better
understand the privacy, security, and
human rights risks associated with Yandex services.
Context on not only how businesses are impacted
by changing technologies, but also getting new contextual
understanding of how the individual buyer and
human experience is changing.
a) that the bible is an imperfect
human representation
of gods word b) that the bible is a mixture
of mythology and divine inspiration c) that the bible was created in a way that people would
understand at the time and intended to be updated d) that a pure message was corrupted intentionally
by evil
humans or spirits
Not for the communist atrocities those were caused
by attempts to engineer society, based on a flawed
understanding of innate
human nature and a fallacious belief in
humans beings as blank slates.
At the centre
of our faith is this reality that in order to be
understood by those identified as His people and perhaps more urgently to be
understood by those who weren't yet His people, God became
human.
One major reason that the military should not turn cases
of military - to - military sex abuse, is that we have a right to be judged
by our peers... who
understand what the mil life does to the
human mind.
rea · son — noun / ˈrēzən / a.Think,
understand, and form judgments
by a process
of logic —
humans do not reason entirely from facts b.Find an answer to a problem
by considering various possible solutions c.Persuade (someone) with rational argument — I tried to reason with her, but without success» I accept nothing on faith» can you prove we evolved from primates or that life started
by random chance?
The discussion does not assert that happiness is constituted solely
by human communication, i.e., the Whiteheadian
understanding is not a simple reversal
of the private view
of liberalism.
All
of which is to say that this fourth view
of nature and
human nature contends we
understand ourselves most truly
by imagining neither that we stand apart from, dominate, and bend nature to our will; nor that we are some unnatural plague upon nature; nor that we are simply immersed in nature and lack both the power and the duty to superintend nature and possibly even improve it.
Understanding this new perspective on church is as difficult today as it was in the days
of Jesus for Jews to
understand a different perspective on Sabbath, but the basic principles seem to be the same: Church, just like Sabbath, is not supposed to be a bunch
of human traditions which have become legalistic laws
by which to judge one another's spiritual maturity.
One
of the core points overlooked
by unbelievers is that
human understanding is not exhausted
by mapping the world
of nature.
Metaphysical realism,
understood in a processive way, requires this triple sense
of objectivity: novel
human doings in need
of guidance, long - enduring systems
of belief that provide the schemata
of interpretation
by which that guiding can be done, and opportunistic skill in sculpting act and theory, fact and canon, into a coherent, fruitful basis for intelligent action.
Contemporary cultures had lost a vital
understanding of the foundations
of human dignity and were increasingly marked both
by disillusion and
by a mechanical and instrumental account
of the
human person.
Im not
understanding I guess... you object to my statement that the creator
of the universe, as
humans generally portray «him» — would have be superior intellectually to our greatest minds
by a wide margin?
In Jeremiah's time the people's
understanding of kingship was tainted
by human kings who had led them to the point
of imminent destruction and deportation.
People often can not
understand the question
of human nature because their way
of understanding it is framed (whether they know it or not)
by the ideas
of positivist empiricism.
The revelational rap against apologetic theology is that it either engages in a sellout to the «world» (the self - disclosure
of God being so utterly relativized
by human wisdom that Christians are unable to tell atheists anything that they don't already know), or it is an exercise in various intellectual imperialisms, such as: «We can prove the existence
of God» or «If
human culture really
understood itself, it would find that it is striving toward that which we already have.»
Given the enormous evils that have been inflicted on
human beings and on the planet
by those who have
understood themselves to be followers
of Jesus, is it not a mistake to continue this tradition?
The study
of history is arid and incomplete unless it is
understood as a work about (and
by) individual
human beings — and, moreover, a story whose substance and manner
of telling are matters
of moral significance.
Since those process categories have been connected with ideas
of God inspired
by the Bible, process theologians believe there is a chance in the twenty - first century to bring the long separated parts
of human understanding into a new, coherent relationship.
Even the noble king could perceive the difficulty
of such a method, for he was not without insight into the
human heart, and
understood that the maiden was at bottom deceived; and no one is so terribly deceived as he who does not himself suspect it, but is as if enchanted
by a change in the outward habiliments
of his existence.
Being limited
by our
human state, we have not ever properly known all
of Its laws no matter what some
human wrote or said, and we will continue to have issues
understanding until we do.
But the underlying philosophy
of personality in classical behaviorism is partial and therefore,
by itself, an incomplete
understanding of human beings.
This model invites students to see the New Testament as the product
of a profoundly
human process
of experience and interpretation,
by which people
of another age and place, galvanized
by a radical religious experience, sought to
understand both that experience and themselves in the light
of the symbols made available to them
by their culture.
Concerning God, Clement pursued two fundamental principles: that God is beyond the reach even
of abstract
human language and therefore must be identified
by what God is not, but that, at the same time, God must be
understood as «the omnipotent God» (Stromata, 1.24): «Nothing withstands God, nothing opposes Him: seeing He is [42] Lord and omnipotent» (1:17).
Stephen Toulmin echoes these sentiments in an elegant statement on the cosmos
understood on the model
of our «home»: «We can do our best to build up a conception
of the «overall scheme
of things» which draws as heavily as it can on the results
of scientific study, informed
by a genuine piety in all its attitudes toward creatures
of other kinds: a piety that goes beyond the consideration
of their usefulness to Humanity as instructions for the fulfillment
of human ends.
One can see recent standoffs in Geneva on so - called traditional values resolutions as manifestations
of a conflict between two rival conceptions
of human dignity: one, supported
by most Western advocates, that focuses on individual autonomy; and the other, proposed
by voices from the global East and South, that focuses on traditional
understandings of human nature.
It is really hard to
understand why some people accept behavior
by a God that would never be accepted
of a
human.
These
understandings are what
humans take for granted
by virtue
of being socialized into a particular imaginary.
Berger wishes to speak
of «a God who is not made
by man, who is outside and not within ourselves,» but he limits his act
of faith in such a God to projections outward from common
human experience, i.e., to signals
of transcendence70 The result is that Berger is left finally with his own experience alone, a consequence that weakens his
understanding not only
of Christian theology but ultimately
of play as well.
Right conrad, it's better to
understand why people have these experiences - and
by now we have a good, solid
understanding of the fallibility
of human reasoning, and the pitfalls it leads to.
Say: The Spirit is
by command
of my Lord, and
of knowledge ye have been vouchsafed but little» (Surah XVII, 85), indicates that the identification
of the soul is His own concern and that the
human mind is too limited to
understand such a supernatural reality.
However, if the subjects
of study are concrete networks
of human practices
by which communities
of faith attempt to respond to God faithfully, and if they are practices which mediate an
understanding of God, then the movement
of theological schooling is more like an engaged meditative gaze than it is like problem solving.
Our foreign policy is formulated
by fallible, egocentric
human beings who constitute our government and who inevitably are serving their scheme
of values and their
understanding of life.
I think scripture is a rich metaphor created
by human in an attempt to
understand the presence
of evil in the world, as well as to express their hope that it will end.
In his encyclical letter on the importance
of St. Thomas» work, Pope Leo also alluded to the Church's need to maintain a deep study
of science: «When the Scholastics, following the teaching
of the Holy Fathers, everywhere taught throughout their anthropology that the
human understanding can only rise to the knowledge
of immaterial things
by things
of sense, nothing could be more useful for the philosopher than to investigate carefully the secrets
of Nature, and to be conversant, long and laboriously, with the study
of physical science.»
David Brooks» recent column on genius, which offered a portrait
of the Mozart who excelled
by logging his ten thousand hours
of rote practice to get on sooner to the good stuff, seemed to gibe poorly with not only our romantic
understanding of unique
human excellence but our practical....
First, it must again be stressed that the eschatological message
of Jesus, the preaching
of the coming
of the Kingdom and
of the call to repentance, can be
understood only when one considers the conception
of man which in the last analysis underlies it, and when one remembers that it can have meaning only for him who is ready to question the habitual
human self - interpretation and to measure it
by this opposed interpretation
of human existence.
Two sentences in the discussion
of reason in the earlier version
of the report could be taken to support the use
of such analysis: «
By reason we relate our witness to the full range
of human knowledge and experience,» and «
By our quest for reasoned
understandings of Christian faith we seek to grasp and express the gospel in a way that will commend itself to thoughtful persons who are seeking to know and follow God's ways.»