Sentences with phrase «of humans and pets»

Such a situation is deleterious (bad for) to the health of humans and pets.

Then wildfire, fanned by vicious Diablo winds, swept over Santa Rosa and the California wine country, displacing thousands of humans and their pets and destroying complete neighborhoods.

The coexistence and cohabitation of humans and pets has become an area of investigation in which a growing number of psychologists, scientists, veterinary surgeons and doctors around the world have become interested.

Albeit containing simple sugars that are known for causing obesity and diabetes, honey is widely prescribed as universal product helpful in nutrition and treatment — both of humans and their pets.

They then compared these two sets of data to each other and to past studies of humans and pets.

With meaningful sessions that focus on the state of the industry, economic trends and forecasting, and the changing demographics of human and pet populations, this must - attend event is for anyone invested in the future of the pet industry.

Even though the uses of human and pet soaps are the similar, they're not quite the same thing.

Maintain a clean home through weekly vacuuming (and immediately disposing of the canister or bag in the trash away from your home) and washing of both human and pet bedding.

I was a keynote speaker at a conference in Vegas years ago that featured the owners of both human and pet funeral homes.

by Aaron Wilmot Aaron Wilmot is an author and researcher in the fields of human and pet health.

With meaningful sessions that focus on the state of the industry, economic trends and forecasting, and the changing demographics of human and pet populations, this must - attend event is for industry leaders and anyone invested in the future of the pet trade.

Not exact matches

The idea, which was primarily based on the research of psychologists John Mayer and Peter Salovey, quickly took off — and went on to greatly influence the way we think about emotions and human behavior.

«This is a topic that's been researched to death by the field of industrial and organizational psychology,» says Peter Cappelli, management professor and director of the center for human resources at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

The meeting included Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Marilyn Tavenner, and entrepreneurs ChenMed CEO Chris Chen and iTriage CEO Peter Hudson, who are considered on the forefront of technological advancement in the health - care industry.

Phillip Plotch, a political science professor and director of the public administration master's program at Saint Peter's University, told Fortune that as new transportation technologies have emerged throughout history, they have allowed humans to radically alter the landscape.

True innovation, Peter Diamandis says, means accepting risk — and failure Peter Diamandis sees a future filled with brilliant innovation — with cars that drive themselves, software that can diagnose illnesses and humans populating new planets like subdivisions — but not without a lot of failure before we get there.

Elon Musk, the founder of Tesla and SpaceX, has openly speculated that humans could be reduced to «pets» by the coming superintelligent machines.

-- Thomas Jefferson (letter to Peter Carr, 10 August 1787): «All natural institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian, or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit.»

To date, more than 500 pets have been reunited with their human companions, thanks to the efforts of the Joplin Humane Society and the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA).

From the Garden of Eden to David's adulterous affair with Bathsheba, from Jesus» sin - filled genealogy to Peter's denial of the Christ, we will challenge and encourage people of faith to tell the whole truth revealed in the Bible about foolish human decisions and the consequences of sin.

I do not believe my Pope is perfect in everything he says or does (he is only human after all) and is only infallible when he speaks from the «Chair of St. Peter.»

• After Germaine Greer said that freedom is the world's most dangerous idea, and sex columnist Dan Savage picked population control, newspaper columnist Peter (brother of Christopher) Hitchens declared on Australian TV that «the most dangerous idea in human history and philosophy remains the belief that Jesus Christ was the son of God and rose from the dead.»

Rabbi Neuberger asserted that «it's really important that one accepts that... new scientific research has taught us... that the human embryo is not as unique as we thought before... We do have to think differently about the «unique quality of human embryos» in the way that Peter Saunders is saying... The miracle of creation... may have to be explained somewhat differently... Our human brains are given to us by God... to better the life of other human beings... and if this technology can do it..., and I don't believe that anybody is going to research beyond fourteen days, then so be it, lets do it.»

So last night our own Peter Lawler debated leading Darwinian Conservative Larry Arnhart here at RIT over the explanatory power of Darwinian evolution to capture to the totality of human experience in general and American political experience in particular.

Gregory of Nyssa, (c.330 - c395), who was bishop of Nyssa, but exiled for a time by the Arian party» used this analogy: «We may be confronted by many who individually share in human nature, such as Peter, James and John, yet the «man» in them is one.»

Peter, Peter, Peter, Before the bible there were the Codes of Hammurabi and the Egyptian Books of the Dead and other ancient rules of life for humans to follow.

The entire Christian story — from the calling of Abraham to the birth of Christ to the sending of the Apostles and into the present — is the story of how God's desire that all people be reconciled to himself (1 Timothy 2:4, 2 Peter 3:9) operates through the concrete particulars of human history.

To Paul, Peter was doing the same as the false brothers tried to do in Jerusalem (the word for compel is used in both 2.14 and 2.3).34 Therefore, if the Galatians choose circumcision, they will no longer be servants of Christ; they will be servants of a human authority, namely those who require circumcision.

Only here has Paul placed real relational distance between himself and the apostles in his retelling of the story, for only here has any apostle (Peter and perhaps James) 35 chosen a human principle.

His own pet proof of «why there almost certainly is no God» (a proof in which he takes much evident pride) is one that a usually mild - spoken friend of mine (a friend who has devoted too much of his life to teaching undergraduates the basic rules of logic and the elementary language of philosophy) has described as «possibly the single most incompetent logical argument ever made for or against anything in the whole history of the human race.»

The Evolution of Adam: What the Bible Does and Doesn't Say About Human Origins by Peter Enns — This book came along and just the right time for me.

Daniel Dore quotes Peter Lengsfeld's excellent comment: «If someday a human expression were found to be directly and absolutely identical to the divine reality, such an expression would be the insurpassable and definitive manifestation of God as we expect to know him in heaven.

Peter van Inwagen, who has become a Christian, is also motivated by the overriding desire to avoid dualism but only considers two alternative views of human beings: physicalism and dualism.

The more we expand and generalize the words we apply to specifically human relationships — speaking of «pet parents,» or referring to our pets as our children or family members — the more we distort the ideas that undergird these terms, and the more we profane the real relationships those terms are supposed to cover.

Though not directly stated anywhere, Peter Enns appears to be a proponent of the idea that the Bible is a library of books written by various authors from various theological perspectives, who are in dialogue with each other over the nature of God and what the human response to Him should be.

The Evolution of Adam: What the Bible Does and Doesn't Say About Human Origins by Peter Enns (see my review)

One question looks to the nature: Peter is a human being; the other to the personal identity: Peter is one of the Twelve, a fisherman and a friend of Jesus.

To hear him sing the aria «Great Bear and the Pleiades» from Peter Grimes» the text suspended on a single pitch as Benjamin Britten's harmonies spin around it like constellations» was to be taken to some height from which the whole miserable panorama of human suffering was for a moment laid bare to our view.

So when Jesus says that we must be born of Water and Spirit, and if you believe and are baptized you will be saved, I agree with you that in a strict sense God does the saving and we need only immerse (baptize) ourselves in the grace he offers us, I believe that the statement Jesus made about marriage to be applicable, «Therefore what God has joined together, no human being must separate» and echo Peter's rhetorical question, «Can anyone keep these people from being baptized with water?

Less incredible, and perhaps only to be expected, is the news that Peter Jackson and Fran Walsh, the dynamic duo who brought The Lord of the Rings to the silver screen, have donated $ 310,000 from the movie's profits to fund human embryonic stem - cell research.

The Church speaks on this, both with the authoritative voice of Peter, and with the work and worth of Catholics uniting with all men and women of goodwill who seek to defend human values.

The Evolution of Adam: What the Bible does and doesn't say about human origins By Peter Enns.

It is hard for us to recognize it now, but Peter and Paul were introducing the first Christian family to an entirely new community, a community that transcends the rigid hierarchy of human institutions, a community in which submission is mutual and all are free.

Christianity too, the religion of persons, divine and human, began appearing more often in Peter's reflections, often in the person of Augustine, he of the restless heart.

Peter learned two things from the dissidents: the notion of «living in the truth»; and the disconcerting thought that Communism and Western liberal democracy had things in common, modern science to begin with, that challenged human freedom and dignity.

According to Peter Berger, moral outrage in the face of evil, courage in defiance of death, and trust in an underlying cosmic order are among the «prototypical human gestures» which can be interpreted as «signals of transcendence».

And perhaps because Christ has said: «I am with you always, to the close of the age» (Matthew 28:20), the history of the last times can only be a series of disasters from the human standpoint, as the Gospels and Peter and Revelation intimaAnd perhaps because Christ has said: «I am with you always, to the close of the age» (Matthew 28:20), the history of the last times can only be a series of disasters from the human standpoint, as the Gospels and Peter and Revelation intimaand Peter and Revelation intimaand Revelation intimate.

Liturgy speaks to the depths within us, to the world we share beyond that of ordinary life, what Peter Berger has so well described as «an infinitely vaster and «more real» world, in which and through which human life receives its ultimate significance.»

The inquisition, The crusades («murderers bearing crosses» as Peter Beagle puts it), the enslavery of millions of indigenous people, the widespread teaching in parochial schools everywhere of the «perfidy» of the Jews, and uncounted other affronts to human civilization.And a billion people, many starving while the church enjoys incredible wealth, froth at the mouth and bleed from the eyeballs with maniacal love for the pope.

Peter Singer, for example, speaks plainly of abortion as the taking of human life and warns those who try to rest the «pro-choice» case on that denial that they are placing their (and his) cause in jeopardy.