Other projects include Lynn Hershman Leeson's Roberta Breitmore (1974 - 1979) in which the artist assumed an alternative identity playing to American stereotypes
of the ideal woman.
Mary became an adult when images
of the ideal woman were almost always domestic; she was even expected to cook dinner for her father and brother each night, regardless of her plans for the evening.
Not do
of this ideal woman some idol, that no one woman can attain.
But in time I realized that love isn't about «luck» or «love at first sight,» it's not about being his version
of the ideal woman, and it's not about using your unhappy childhood or a bad experience with a guy from your past as an excuse or justification for your current dating dilemma.
You can find women from picturesque cities like charming Moscow and others, trust your choice
of ideal woman to our Russian marriage agency.
Your possibilities therefore of discovering a magnificent Russian woman is very great, but if you are in search
of those ideal women you have to keep in mind your competitors.
Not exact matches
Today's typical Leon's shopper is a 52 - year - old male, but the company's
ideal client is a busy 35 - year - old
woman who cares intensely about her home and likes to share photos
of her imperfect but real living space on social media.
Women are $ 522,000 short
of their
ideal retirement savings goal.
Consequently, many
of those who succeed in the EBV program weren't always
ideal military men and
women, says Nathan Atherley, a 36 - year - old former Air Force officer and 2010 UConn EBV alum.
The Classic Cardy is a knee - high gumboot that's made
of our
ideal reduced UGG Stripe Cable Knit and Boots FOR
WOMEN UGG SHOE?
One
of the most appealing things about a Pisces man is that he fits the
ideal of what many
women envision as their Prince Charming.
The skillset these
women and others like possess are
ideal for the next generation
of investments.
MLK Now, in its third consecutive year focused on the contributions
of women to the modern movement for parity in the celebration
of the
ideals of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., was held at Riverside Church Jan. 15, 2018, the site where Dr. King gave his controversial 1967 «Beyond Vietnam» speech.
I don't believe feminism addresses it, nor does a lot
of the traditionalist
ideals we have which also are actually gynocentric because they are chivalrous and protective
of women as inferior, weaker damsels.
With all this is mind, when a
women takes the role
of the pastor I would not necessarily call it wrong, just not
ideal.
When the U.S. Muslim community sounds out LOUD and CLEAR, without equivocation, and immediately against all forms
of terrorism, including all aggressive religious intolerance for human rights,
women's right, children, equal protection under the law, the respect for other religions to coexist, the right to free speech, and the ability to separate church from state, IF THEY FINALLY DO THAT AND LOUDLY, then we will begin to feel comfortable that they are truly embracing American
ideals and here to join us, not to oppose, defy, or undermine what we hold dear.
If plural marriage is God's highest
ideal, then why are there approximately EQUAL numbers
of men and
women on the planet?
Mother's Day struck a resonant chord in the culture - with all those unnerved by
women's suffrage and urban migration, with Protestants long familiar with the maternal
ideals of evangelical womanhood, with business leaders (especially florists) who were quick to see the commercial potential, with politicians who still regularly voiced the Enlightenment precept that virtuous mothers were the essential undergirding
of the republic in nurturing sons to be responsible citizens.
The feminist reformist recognizes that that
ideal is not fully achieved, and that there were times when male Christians refused to accept the full humanity
of women, but they consider those failures as expressions
of inadequacy and human perversion
of the gospel.
Truth and honor and the well being
of others and the
ideal of a better social order for future generations — these are all worth while for a man to lay down his life and for a
woman to give up her husband or a mother to give up her son.
The depictions
of Augustus himself, as the model pater familias, and various imperial
women, such as his wife Livia, sister Octavia, or niece Antonia Augusta, as
ideal Roman matrons, were particularly central in this respect.
Despite the rhetoric
of «privacy,» «
women in control,» and «demedicalization,» there have been four office / clinic visits (in the
ideal uncomplicated case), two ultrasound examinations, multiple blood tests, and strict medical supervision.
What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part
of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence
of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence
of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's
ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian
women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian
women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line
of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry
of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy
of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws
of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading
of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse
of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.
I remember countless conversations in the dorm rooms
of my conservative Christian college about how to defer to a guy as the «spiritual leader» in a relationship, an
ideal that far too often resulted in
women deliberately diminishing their own gifts, ideas, and dreams in an effort to better play second fiddle.
You see this sort
of language a lot in complementarian literature: «real men,» «real
women,» «real marriage,» «hardwired,» «programmed,» «blueprint» — as if masculinity and femininity are rigid, set - in - stone
ideals to which we must ascribe, rather than fluid expressions
of our unique selves.
It is the protection, guidance, and release
of the power to love in all the human ways, and the power to give love to God and the neighbour, which justifies the restraints, disciplines and prohibitions in the Christian
ideal of the union
of man and
woman.
Some
of my friends are sympathetic to the pro-life movement's
ideal of a world where mother and child are both offered love and support, a world less subject to the cultural and economic forces that can make motherhood unthinkable for
women in unplanned pregnancies.
If the
ideal can not be lived out then I would hope that neither my daughters nor any other young man or
woman would engage in premarital sexual relations except as the result
of the most mature act
of decision - making.
I think I have an idea
of where it began and why it grew and how it continues to grow — it's a combination
of my origin story,
of comparison,
of our messed - up culture,
of over-heard comments,
of patriarchal bullshit,
of feeling different than the patented
ideal,
of thought conditioning,
of despair,
of how we centre
women who conform to the
ideal,
of our fear
of getting older,
of how the
women in my circles spoke about their own bodies and obsessed over calorie counting and wrinkles,
of how our culture speaks about
women everywhere from the Internet to sanctuaries to coffee shops to our own inner monologues.
«Deeply immersed in these values as they were, however, the
women Stevens interviewed were hardly immune to the more mainstream
ideals of womanhood shaped in part by liberal feminism.
The efforts
of those ordinary men and
women eventually led to victory for our country and the
ideals it sought — and continues to seek — to embody.
Young men and
women today feel themselves challenged to identify themselves with the community and institution devoted to the service
of God rather than with an
ideal; the human need
of which they are made aware is one that only the community can minister to; the words through which they hear the Word
of God addressed to them are likely to be the words
of the Church.
The virgin Mary exemplifies the
ideal woman in her voluntary submission and response to the will
of God.
Shalit shows how, even in the face
of such cultural pressures, a surprising number
of young
women are reclaiming the
ideal of modesty — and often returning to traditional religion in order to do so.
It was one
of the chief functions
of the good
woman not only to uphold a moral
ideal for her husband but to effectively starve her son emotionally so that he would be diverted from any temptations toward sensuality into the proper course
of decency and efficiency.
According to McNamara, it was in the twelfth century that the
ideal of syneisactism came under serious attack: «By mid-century, clerical observers had already begun to attack the syneisactism that joined religious men and
women in a common enterprise and that defied the carefully nurtured fear
of women at the base
of clerical reform.
James Dobson taught, in no uncertain terms, that the biblical
ideal was for
women with young children to stay home instead
of work.
The question at the bottom
of it all is this: Does patriarchy --(man's rule over
woman)-- represent God's
ideal for the world, or is it a result
of sin?
This
ideal might be broken down still further, so that the exemplary man and the exemplary
woman, the exemplary aged one or youth are recognized in persons
of the most distant or most recent past (the «saint»).
We have seen how the American success
ideal has taken its toll on
women, on youth, on all groups who do not approximate the Anglo - Saxon Protestant
ideal of character — above all on blacks.
These are teaching the
ideal that they may be aiding young
women to the sanity in being fond
of their men / husbands; fond
of their offspring / children; sane; pure; seeing to the home well; being subject to the / their men, that none
of the word
of God may be spoken against (on their account).
Just as androcentric competition in the polis had the dark underside
of classist, racist, and sexist repressions
of women - slaves - children, so Greco - Roman cultures and politics came to renounce even their limited democratic
ideals and practices in the pursuit
of the certainties and necessities
of militaristic imperialism.
It would be that the people
of God from long ago understood (in God's great purpose) «function in being» far better than we; that men &
women (and children) participate extensively with community life in Christ, doing so with some understood, intrinsic variation / rolls — Not because they must, but rather because doing so continues as God's
ideal for His children.
It contains the aforementioned onslaught against Playboy which exposes the pseudo-sex
of the airbrushed centerfold, the
ideal woman pimply adolescent boys prefer because she makes no demands whatever.
But the same people who say we should now abolish slavery still hold that the
ideal of marriage is the submission
of a
woman to a man.
The Romantic Juan actually loved
women, or at least loved «
woman» as an
ideal, and in despair
of finding the
ideal embodied fled from one
woman to another.
(In the past, men like Alcott and Emerson were the public spokesmen for the simplicity
ideal, but
of course
women did much
of the work that made simple living possible.)
Elizabeth Cady Stanton, speaking before a congressional committee at the end
of the 19th century, invoked
ideals of the self, free choice and individualism to defend and advance the cause
of women's liberation.
For this tradition nourished over the centuries the slow emergence
of the
ideal of a civilized politics, a politics
of civil conversation,
of noncoercion,
of the consent
of the governed,
of pluralism,
of religious liberty,
of respect for the inalienable dignity
of every human person,
of voluntary cooperation in pursuit
of the common good, and
of checks and balances against the wayward tendencies
of sinful men and
women.
From the perspective
of the family
ideal,
women already played a crucial though indirect role in the public arena as wives and mothers.