Your religious faith that global warming is a lie and your consistent defense
of an indefensible graph is rather disturbing.
It's because contrition is absent from the perpetrators and defence
of the indefensible prevails among the defenders of these «inappropriate and misleading» activities.
This large a change would bring out pitchforks and torches as people realize just how badly they've been used by a small group of scientists and politicians, how much they are the victims
of indefensible abuse of statistics to average in the terrible with the merely poor as if they are all equally likely to be true with randomly distributed differences.
I previously commented that Dr. Judith Curry had prepared a table of different values of the ECS that illustrates the relative impacts
of the indefensible cherry picking of a value that suited the agenda of the IWG rather than a more recent value.
Your melodramatic (and obtuse) defense
of the indefensible conduct of Peter Gleick actually reveals your own similar lack of ethical standards, and thereby you reveal yourself as one whose opinions and work product should not be taken seriously.
I also noticed the ranting defense
of the indefensible by mainstream climate scientists on Real Climate.
Regardless of your robust defense
of the indefensible, I'm pretty sure that I'll be proved correct.
She's had a couple
of indefensible clunkers, of course — though I have little patience for those who dismiss a «Golden Compass» or an «Australia» out of hand.
It is kind
of indefensible in logic, but it is emotionally appealing to lots of people.
This curious warning is the not - too - distant cousin
of the indefensible Western myth that newborns can «manipulate» their parents, even before they have the mental ability to do so.
But hey, we don't want to upset the righteous defenders
of the indefensible, those who claim that all people are biased yet none of the referees are biased (look, just bear with me here, I'm trying really hard to dig myself into a deep dark hole...)
I seriously doubt any true Christians would even bother reading a story like this and certainly not taking the time to post your defensive statements
of your indefensible postion.
Thank you Lorraine, for your unabashed ignorance and your poorly thought out defense
of the indefensible.
The preacher may devote the message to a defense
of the indefensible, each stage of his development moving his hearers progressively in the opposite direction.
The defense
of the indefensible often leads to a kind of derangement in otherwise rational people.
Hence, it has been forced to defend all manner
of indefensible beliefs or to allegorize statements that are plainly intended to bear a literal meaning.
Incredible public displays of contempt for white opinion, in defense
of the indefensible, and all with the tacit, if not explicit, support of much of mainstream black opinion.
Not exact matches
The Alliance
of Automobile Manufacturers, which represents GM, Toyota, Volkswagen, and nine other automakers, sent a letter to EPA head Scott Pruitt calling the fuel efficiency rules «the product
of egregious procedural and substantive defects» that are «riddled with
indefensible assumptions, inadequate analysis and a failure to engage with contrary evidence.»
Mitch Bainwol, president and chief executive
of the Alliance
of Automobile Manufacturers, said in a letter to Pruitt the decision was «the product
of egregious procedural and substantive defects» and is «riddled with
indefensible assumptions, inadequate analysis and a failure to engage with contrary evidence.»
Few men with power would ever consider, let alone engage in, the kind
of conduct engaged in by Weinstein and others but they must do more than just refrain from the
indefensible.
One
of my mentors, the late Reid Buckley (younger brother to William F. Buckley), in his text titled Strictly Speaking: Reid Buckley's
Indefensible Handbook on Public Speaking, described this quality
of authenticity very succinctly.
When a Rule
of this significant size and impact on the economy resorts to misrepresentation cited as fact misleads Americans, it must be
indefensible as written.
Part
of my rationale for speaking so strongly here is that Kevin called into question the integrity
of the Tax Policy Center, a group staffed by highly respected former civil servants, by calling their work «scientifically
indefensible» and «fiction».
This conclusion was based on
indefensible economic logic and the absence
of the IMF's debt sustainability analysis intentionally biased the negotiations.
The decline in US infrastructure investment is
indefensible in light
of recent declines in interest rates, employment opportunities and materials costs.
The notion
of being «behind the curve» in that regard seems
indefensible.
The greatness
of America is rooted in the virtue
of our principles; that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with inalienable rights; that government must be by the consent
of those who are governed; that it is precisely the defense
of rights and due process for the utterly
indefensible that secures the rights
of all others.
They still vote on the basis
of a logically
indefensible worldview, and choose their candidates accordingly.
Since the position
of the social parasite is one that can not be universalized, it is
indefensible to the sensitive conscience when the true position is made clear.
27 %
of American humans suffer from
indefensible mental myopia.
Her whole concept
of morality is just bizarre and
indefensible.
In what is becoming something
of a pig pile on the GOP from the Christian Left, more than two dozen bishops from mainline Protestant denominations sent a letter to Congress today denouncing proposed Republican budget cuts as «morally
indefensible.»
Luch - Stop defending the
indefensible; both the Friar AND the mind - forged delusions
of others.
Indeed, one can argue that this early, excruciating experience
of existential anxiety and humiliated pride — Mantel's awareness
of her own inadequacy and her never - forgotten failure to discharge a responsibility laid too soon on her small shoulders, in effect, to defend the
indefensible — conditions her identification, in later life, with Thomas Cromwell.
A loving father and faithful husband, patron
of the arts and friend
of the poor, Cromwell not only defends the
indefensible, and even legitimates it, by drafting new laws, he also, in his sweet time, takes definitive revenge on his enemies: those who stood in judgment on his patrons, Cardinal Wolsey and the king, and those who underestimated himself, the lowborn blacksmith's son.
1) Your explanation
of homosexuality and same - sex acts has been so «all over the board» as to be
indefensible.
No amount
of logical gymnastics, and the religious do take them to Olympic levels to try and defend the
indefensible, can fully explain away all
of the glaring inconsistencies in creationism.
And I heartily agree with you that the continued use
of «Holy Ghost,» instead
of «Holy Spirit,» is
indefensible.
They spent so much time and energy defending the
indefensible that they failed to make truly relevant the deepest insights
of the faith.
This vagueness doubtless is partly due to the conflict
of traditions — a conflict in which exponents
of the primacy
of the «secret call» may take the position that it alone is adequate while others who emphasize the first importance
of church call come to the
indefensible position
of renouncing the importance
of command and obedience enacted in solitariness.
The trouble is that such encounters pit an
indefensible and outmoded legalism against a propaganda line that says, basically, that there is no problem about homosexuals except that
of civil rights.
After all, the Supreme Court itself has now declared that a moral objection to homosexuality is
indefensible, a distillation
of an unreasoned prejudice.
Moreover, in invoking George MacDonald — whom I regard as the greatest Christian thinker ever to have written in English, as well as one
of three theologians with whom any disagreement is morally
indefensible — De La Noval has entirely disarmed me.
What wonder then that certain people, instead
of finding their own conduct
indefensible, find it incumbent upon them to defend Christianity.
One could stop defending the
indefensible and search their soul for a more logical understanding
of life's riddles.
Ratzinger comments that the great synthesis found in the traditional Christian interpretation, «would become problematic when historical consciousness developed rules
of interpretation that made Patristic exegesis appear non-historical and so objectively
indefensible».
This idea is
indefensible, and it is no use saying «the metaphysical and the modern / scientific concepts
of matter are not the same» (his italics): the modern / scientific concept is what a metaphysicianworth his salt should be discussing, not some chimera known only to his philosophical allies.
Kaplan's theology embraced a popular view
of the nature
of science that would prove ultimately to be
indefensible.
By the beginning
of this century a great change had taken place and James Orr prefaced his defense
of the traditional position by sketching the widespread questioning and rejection
of «bodily resurrection» by Christian scholars.10 In 1907 Kirsopp Lake published the first study
of the resurrection, in English, which rested upon a thorough application
of historical criticism to the New Testament records and he concluded that «The empty tomb is for us doctrinally
indefensible and is historically insufficiently accredited.
Part
of it is perhaps a belated expression
of guilt and embarrassment over having for so long defended the
indefensible.