Intelligibility is obtained through the concept
of individual identity as consisting in a continuity of reactions.
When I conceive
of its individual identity as consisting in a continuity of reactions, I am conceiving of a portion of space continually reacting.14
The concept
of individual identity as consisting in a continuity of reactions functions as a regulative principle for the process that renders the output (ultimately the world) intelligible.
When I judge on the basis of a single reaction that there is an object there in the dark I have bumped against, I must apply the concept
of individual identity as consisting in a continuity of reactions.
I do not intend by my remarks about space - time to imply that, if Peirce had known relativity physics, he would have given up his notion
of individual identity as consisting in a continuity of reactions and accepted the idea of a definite single event as intelligible by itself.
Peirce did make use of a rather unusual notion
of individual identity as analogous to a continuous «line,» a continuity, of reactions.
Not exact matches
As more and more people opt to make their diverse sexual and gender identities public, and as choice - craving individuals seek clothing that perfectly reflects their personal style, retail and fashion insiders expect sales of androgynous duds to climb in the years ahea
As more and more people opt to make their diverse sexual and gender
identities public, and
as choice - craving individuals seek clothing that perfectly reflects their personal style, retail and fashion insiders expect sales of androgynous duds to climb in the years ahea
as choice - craving
individuals seek clothing that perfectly reflects their personal style, retail and fashion insiders expect sales
of androgynous duds to climb in the years ahead.
I was very interested in this whole notion
of each
of us
as individual professionals who are on the Internet and how that changes the way we do business, our careers, our brand
identity.
«
As a trans
individual, I'm very cognizant
of how
identity works and how people often go about portraying and communicating their
identity.»
This is because while blockchain addresses themselves are pseudonymous, the
identities of the
individuals who use those addresses can be ascertained by connecting on - blockchain transactions to off - platform events, such
as the shipping
of goods from one street address to another.
Fraud and money laundering will be tougher to execute,
as it would become significantly more difficult to forge documentation; and such crimes would be easier to detect,
as the
identity of an
individual or entity can also be stored on the blockchain, which ensures secure and quick
identity authentication without the need to warehouse data at third - party repositories.
«Tribalism,»
as he defines it, is «the commitment
of individuals and groups to their own history, culture, and
identity, and this commitment (though not any particular version
of it) is a permanent feature
of human social life.»
The modern
individual has too often subjugated the spontaneous to the orderly, the possible to the necessary, the enthusiastic to the reasonable, the wonderful to the regular.9 In yet another description, Keen identifies our current «dis - ease»
as our inability to view life
as a «story,» to integrate past, present, and future into a meaningful whole.10 The metaphysical myths
of our tradition no longer confer
identity upon us today.
If one considers, however briefly, what conditions will make possible the flowering in the human heart
of this new universal love, so often vainly dreamed
of but now at last leaving the realm
of the utopian and declaring itself
as both possible and necessary, one notices this: that if men on earth, all over the earth, are ever to love one another it is not enough for them to recognize in one another the elements
of a single something; they must also, by developing a «planetary» consciousness, become aware
of the fact that without loss
of their
individual identities they are becoming a single somebody.
America, on the other hand, a strong tradition
of respect for
individuals as morally autonomous beings frustrates contemporary attempts to provide social solidarity and hence a socially informed sense
of identity.
Upon careful analysis, at least ten such points become apparent: (1) Blake alone among Christian artists has created a whole mythology; (2) he was the first to discover the final loss
of paradise, the first to acknowledge that innocence has been wholly swallowed up by experience; (3) no other Christian artist or seer has so fully directed his vision to history and experience; (4) to this day his is the only Christian vision that has openly or consistently accepted a totally fallen time and space
as the paradoxical presence
of eternity; (5) he stands alone among Christian artists in identifying the actual passion
of sex
as the most immediate epiphany
of either a demonic or a redemptive «Energy,» just
as he is the only Christian visionary who has envisioned the universal role
of the female
as both a redemptive and a destructive power; (6) his is the only Christian vision
of the total kenotic movement
of God or the Godhead; (7) he was the first Christian «atheist,» the first to unveil God
as Satan; (8) he is the most Christocentric
of Christian seers and artists; (9) only Blake has created a Christian vision
of the full
identity of Jesus with the
individual human being (the «minute particular»); and (10)
as the sole creator
of a post-biblical Christian apocalypse, he has given Christendom its only vision
of a total cosmic reversal
of history.
«A higher religion imposes a conflict, a division, torment and struggle within the
individual... we escape from this strain by attempting to revert to an
identity of religion and culture which prevailed at a more primitive stage;
as when we indulge in alcohol
as an anodyne, we consciously seek unconsciousness» (Notes, p. 68) Typically, Eliot did not attempt to lessen the strain; rather, he saw the church
as the «salt
of the earth,» affecting society at its deepest levels.
I tend to side with Pannenberg's «loose» sense
of identity — continuity through time
of an
individual —
as phenomenologically more adequate: it does express the subjective sense
of sameness through time
of which persons are aware.
The final point at which the
identity of all
individuals will be both constituted and revealed is at present only a posit or regulative principle
of reason, which we treat
as if (in hopes that?)
To ask about the future
of the
identity «Christian,» therefore, is to raise questions not so much about
individuals as about social institutions.
The idea that
individual identity should be subordinated to communal
identity is viewed
as intolerably oppressive — except, it seems, in the case
of the «loving gay and lesbian support community.»
Together the partners must gain a sense
of identity as a family unity, over and above their
identity as separate
individuals.
Special care should be taken to discourage young people, who in their search for personal
identity tend to be conformists, from interpreting and practicing democracy
as majority rule, in disregard
of individual and minority rights and careless
of the proper subordination
of the will
of the group to the principles
of justice.
If Fitzgerald was attentive to the ways in which financial capital was based on speculation, perhaps this time Luhrmann is attentive to the free expenditure
of capital
as the basis for the celebration
of one's own
individual identity in terms
of consumer choice.
We pray primarily
as members
of the community
of Christ's followers, where our
individual identity, purpose and welfare are nested.
But if what I have said regarding asymmetrical relations and human
identity is correct, the primary moral question becomes: When does an
individual human life become
as valuable
as the life
of an animal?
Thus the
identity of any «socially composite» entity is completely relative to the endurance
of an established social order and dependent upon
individual constituent interaction, and can not under any circumstance be regarded
as something which is manifested unto itself.
Griffin & Sherburne, New York: The Free Press, 1978, 350)
Individual identity and completeness
of unity are retained,
as apparently is immediacy.
There are a variety
of ways in which this is so, but, at the same time, it's clear that certain aspects
of pagan familial virtue are not exactly incompatible with the Biblical sacred order that can check or overcome their excesses and pathologies — just
as the Biblical order imposes powerful interdicts, not to be confused with taboos, against the kind
of violent desires that, to the morbid fascination
of the ancient Greeks, deconstructed and destroyed the
identities of family - bound
individuals.
A liberal education, Freedman went on to say, «ought to make a person independent
of mind, skeptical
of authority and received views, prepared to forge an
identity for himself or herself, and capable
of becoming an
individual not bent upon copying other persons — even persons
as persuasive and influential
as one's father.»
It defines conversion therapy
as any therapeutic approach assumes one gender
identity is «inherently preferable to any other, and attempts to bring about a change
of sexual orientation or gender
identity, or seeks to supress an
individual's expression
of sexual orientation or gender
identity on that basis.»
The problems
of identity and sexuality can be seen
as problems in the functioning
of a family — in this case churches and congregations that have difficulty in supporting
individuals in the expression
of their
identity and sexuality.
As psychological sexual
identity comes to define who
individuals are in the most basic sense, then everything else --- from society's moral norms to our physical bodies --- has the potential
of becoming simply so much external tyranny to be overthrown or turned into plastic, something to be escaped, ignored, or remade in accordance with
individual whims.
In the first experience
of a new
individual, memory must by definition be lacking; insofar
as electrons and the like lack enduring
individual identity, neither can they remember.
The curriculum they suggest, along with participation in the community
of faith, is designed to shape Christian
identity by an intense study
of how groups and
individuals created themselves
as Christians
as they responded to felt needs and wrestled with issues
of ultimate significance in their age just
as we do in ours.
One
of the obvious difficulties with these suggestions is that the fundamental issue
as to how the
individual churches themselves have internalized different understandings
of baptism
as being a part
of their existence and self -
identity, an existence and
identity which has very often been at least partially shaped
as a reaction to the teachings propounded by other churches, has not been adequately addressed.
So transferring the existential valence
of existing to «actuality»» has the logical effect
of reducing our ordinary sense
of «existing» to that
of «self
identity» and so picture the act
of creation
as one
of adding existence to already constituted
individuals.
But any judgment
as to
individual identity is output and is regulated by its principle
of continuity.
The respect in which I conceive
of an
individual object
as distinct from my reaction with it is then that I conceive
of the former but not the latter
as retaining an
identity through time.
What is intelligible is not its existence but its
individual identity as consisting in a continuity
of reactions.
And this persistence is intelligible only
as a continuity
of reactions; a collection
of discrete reactions can never be welded into an
individual identity.
With this cognition, reactions are welded into a continuity
of reactions constituting an
individual identity, and an
individual is cognized
as instantiating a real universal or law.
But through the concept
of individual identity, I conceptualize the experience
as an encounter with an
individual existent.
Just
as one has first the concept
of line
identity and then fixes points in order to determine properties
of a particular line, one has first the concept
of individual identity and then experiences a reaction that determines properties
of a particular
individual.
Peirce seems to have had considerations like the above in mind when, after defining an
individual as something which reacts, he went on to proclaim that «everything whose
identity consists in a continuity
of reactions will be a single logical
individual» (3.613).
After declaring that «everything whose
identity consists in a continuity
of reactions will be a single logical
individual,» Peirce explained: «Thus any portion
of space, so far
as it can be regarded
as reacting, is for logic a single
individual; its spatial extension is no objection» (3.613).
A word more about the inner character
of the event - theoretical framework, which consists
of (1) the usual quantificational theory
of first order, extended to include the theory
of virtual classes and relations, (2) the theory
of identity, (3) Lesniewski's mereology or calculus
of individuals, (4) logical syntax in its modern form, (5) a semantics or theory
of reference both extensional and intentional, (6) variant renditions
of systematic pragmatics
as needed, (7) the theory
of events, states, acts, and processes, and, finally, (8) a theory
of structural or grammatical relations
of the kind needed for the analysis
of natural language.
If we strip that which constitutes our
identity of all particularity,
as these philosophies did and had to do, if they were to display the
identity as absolute, then there is nothing left by which to distinguish one
individual from another.
First
of all, his conception
of reality
as social process makes
individual personal
identity through time an abstraction from a more concrete network
of social interaction which unites
individuals.
This harm consists in the irreversible scrambling
of three things: genealogies, by substituting «parenting» for fatherhood and motherhood; the status
of the child, who would go from being a subject to being an object to which others have a right; and sexual
identity, which rather than being a natural given would have to give way to orientation
as an
individual expression, in the name
of the struggle against inequality, perverted into the elimination
of differences.