Sentences with phrase «of intelligent»

Organic agriculture — identified as a package of intelligent and innovative farming techniques, sustainable and fair food chains based on principles that strengthen small - scale farmers and empower rural economies - are being adopted globally by governments and local authorities, carried out by millions of farmers and supported by a rapidly increasing number of consumers.

For me the best part of the conference was that there was a room full of intelligent likeminded people that were all focused and passionate about this issue and actively working in this field, and that was able to quell my feelings of distress, knowing that this issue is a work in progress, it is solvable, and people are dedicated to tackling it.

The future lies in the integration of intelligent manufacturing (such as next generation 3D printing) with real - time sensors that capture individual needs, to develop structured foods that are customised for optimum nutrient delivery based on the person's genetic information, lifestyle and physiological state.

Quin Systems, designer and supplier of intelligent end - of - line automated packing systems, has launched a new Versapack ™ machine.

In sharp contrast with this view of life is that of the intelligent agnostic.

The actual Cambon Group simply by Chanel regarding lovely gold equipment having sets of zipped holes and storage compartments [url = http://www.jp-chanel.net/] シャネルバッグ [/ url] with all the gazing Chanel logo could be the proper representative of intelligent as well as vibrant pattern.

People talk about the topsy - turvy theology of the kingdom of God where the rich are poor and «the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate» [1 Corinthians 1:19].

You said: «Even if we were on the same plane with angels, you are perfect evidence, for those who believe, of an intelligent man rebelling against God making it very reasonable to believe in an «intelligent» angel rebelling against God.»

The existence of intelligent life doesn't imply that those conditions were created specifically for that life.

The evidence of intelligent design is all around us.

What makes it human is its living intelligence, that is, the force of intelligent life that is incarnate within it.

It is rather comical that you call others «children» considering the level of intelligent discussion and critical thinking displayed in most of your comments is roughly equivalent to a 10 year old.

Without a doubt, the thinking and ideas of this intelligent and educated, thinking man would have evolved.

The phenomenal success of the electronic church is in part a result of intelligent application of revolutionary technology, but a more important factor is America's cultural drift toward conservatism.

For example, imagine if a new discovery in physics (like a secret coherent message from God embedded in the structure of human DNA and other life forms) were to provide evidence of an intelligent creator, this would not actually prove the existence of the omnipotent God.

Most Intelligent Design theorists claim to be agnostic about the nature of this intelligent designer, but many will admit privately that they think that the intelligent designer is God.

I think if a scientist (not teaching a class) wants to explore the idea of intelligent design, that shouldn't immediately destroy his career.

The mountain loads of evidence you cite for evolution are not at odds with the idea of intelligent design.

Their target is the general educated reader who seeks to understand «the Bible as a work of great literary force and authority, a work of which it is entirely credible that it should have shaped the minds and lives of intelligent men and women for two millennia or more.

However, for the sake of an intelligent understanding of the present text and its occasional mild disorder or repetition, we observe first that whereas JE appears through 6:1, the Priestly history is markedly present in 6:2 - 7:13.

They are also more likely than Christians to accept the possibility of intelligent life, other than humans, elsewhere in the universe.

The goal of scientific research is to attempt to resolve contradictions by developing richer and more sophisticated theories - and this is entirely and perfectly consistent with the development of any intelligent person's belief about God.

Those who think so include people who have compiled records of intelligent and dedicated radicalism going back a decade or more.

We're open and affirming to GLBTQ folk; we have many women clergy; we think that science and religion can and should be part of intelligent dialogue; and we believe that politics should support the common good.

Occasional pockets of intelligent design do not extend to the whole evolutionary mechanism.

The long winded story about the Universe following natural laws and blah blah blah... that also leads to the idea of an intelligent designer.

While no conclusive decision is reached, the kind of intelligent and civil debate represented here is always refreshing.

I was simlpy making the point that in the natural world all things tend toward decay or disorder, and that any order (ie the resence of intelligent life), is a strong evidence for the existance of God (Higher intelligence).

Science isn't the enemy of the intelligent designer belief.

@HawaiiGuest Your ignoring the evidence I'm giving you... prof of an intelligent designer is in the fact of improbable fine tuning that me and you enjoy that allow us to live.

He actually was backed into a corner, having accepted the mathematical impossibility of intelligent life given demands of fine tuning, and had to claim multiverse with infinite universes to escape the supernatural necessity.

I am in no way suggesting the absence of intelligent, coherent supporters of same - sex marriage who capably utilize metaphysics or ethics.

That being said the definition of intelligent is not «behaving rationally to stimulus.»

My interpretation of intelligent is not necessarily at the level of human intelligence but is on the same spectrum, for example many animals display intelligence but at varying degrees.

But Gödel's God is not the well - behaved deity of the old natural theology, or the happy harmonizer of the intelligent - design subculture.

@HG To be clear the prof of an intelligent designer is in the fact of improbable fine tuning that me and you enjoy that allow us to live.

@ ME Further more to believe in a multi verse with the evidence and the knowledge of the cosmos we have today some consider more extreme than the idea of a intelligent designer.

That's the point of an intelligent design that it was made specifically for us.

NOMINUS: My interpretation of intelligent is not necessarily at the level of human intelligence but is on the same spectrum, for example many animals display intelligence but at varying degrees.

above is not the same idea behind ID its a mere attempt to disservice the complexity of the universe and the incredible odds of intelligent life on Earth.

You see your ideas the universe not being «fine tuned» are actually positives for the claim of intelligent design.

There are plenty of intelligent folks who claim a belief in god.

@Chance, «Based on what we do know this little blue planet was befitted by extreme precision; helping the argument of an intelligent designer.»

So we have a God of intelligent cause and effect throughout the known and unknown Universe.

Based on what we do know this little blue planet was befitted by extreme precision; helping the argument of an intelligent designer.

Instead of intelligent, perhaps a similar interchangable word, logical, should be used.

You refute odds and say we don't have a clue through science the probability of life and further more the reason / occurrence of why we have life but your trying to build a argument against the idea of an intelligent designer through science.

Call us non-believers anything you want, just keep your cotton candy jesus out of intelligent conversations.

The simple minded people I was referring are the people responding to this post who are implying that if you don't believe in religion, then you can't believe in god or some kind of intelligent creator, and not religious people in general.

Or, as Whitehead himself put it in another context, «The folly of intelligent people, clear - headed and narrow - visioned, has precipitated many catastrophes» (AI 60).