Sentences with phrase «of internalizing symptoms»

Future studies of the sources and consequences of EV may also want to include pubertal status, as pubertal status has been related to both depressive and aggressive affect (Brooks - Gunn et al. 1994), and recent evidence shows that pubertal status and emotional reactivity to experimentally induced stress interact in the prediction of internalizing symptoms (Leen - Feldner et al. 2007).

Recent reviews suggest that children bullied by siblings are at increased risk of internalizing symptoms.

Social Context and Violence Exposure as Predictors of Internalizing Symptoms in Mothers and Children Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence.

Cortisol concentrations across the lab visit interacted with stress exposure across the year such that children with lower average cortisol at Time 1 and increased stress across the 12 months showed elevated levels of internalizing symptoms.

Serious family financial strain, maternal depression, and attenuated cortisol all made unique contributions in models predicting current clinical levels of internalizing symptoms as rated by mothers and teachers.

While several studies have demonstrated stability and poor outcomes of internalizing symptoms in preschoolers, there has not yet been longitudinal data available to inform the course of preschool depression and whether it shows homotypic continuity into early childhood.

Understanding associations between vagal regulation of cardiac activity and internalizing symptoms during childhood calls for fine - grained developmental analyses that take into account the heterogeneity of internalizing symptoms, as well as developmental phase, context, and gender.

It is widely known that parents tend to underestimate the frequency of internalizing symptoms in their own children (e.g., Muris et al. 1999; Cosi et al. 2010) and that child — parent agreement for internalizing problems is generally lower compared with the child — parent agreement of externalizing problems (e.g., Achenbach et al. 1987; Cantwell et al. 1997).

Since anxiety and depression are highly correlated and often comorbid, it is important that studies separate anxiety and depression (as opposed to using a composite measure of internalizing symptoms) in order to increase specificity.

The findings underscore the importance of assessing the social impact of internalizing symptoms in children with ASD.

The current study examined two emotion regulation strategies, cognitive reappraisal and affective suppression, in interaction with self - report and biological measures of emotional reactivity as predictors of internalizing symptoms.

We used a multilevel conceptual framework to examine how children's vagal regulation of cardiac activity and mothers» internalizing symptoms were jointly associated with children's developmental trajectories of internalizing symptoms from ages 4 to 10 years old.

There is currently no developmental model that accounts for the role of internalizing symptoms in the etiology of adolescent SU.

Furthermore, no studies have distinguished the potential different role of internalizing symptoms on trajectories of probability and amount of SU.

Mediating Effects of Parent — Child Relationships and Body Image in the Prediction of Internalizing Symptoms in Urban Youth.

In one of the few developmental accounts of the role of internalizing problems in the development of adolescent SU, Hussong et al. (2011) suggested that the high co-occurrence internalizing and externalizing symptoms and the strong influence externalizing symptoms on SU during this period may obscure the unique effects of internalizing symptoms on adolescent SU.

Consistent with hypotheses, we found that adolescents raised in cohesive or balanced climates fared better in terms of internalizing symptoms, externalizing symptoms, and self - concept as compared to adolescents raised in conflictual or controlling climates.

Youth who experience high levels of internalizing symptoms may be motivated to self - medicate emotional distress, and high levels of externalizing symptoms may place youth in risky peer contexts that provide access to alcohol and drugs and support use.

Irritable and Defiant Sub-Dimensions of ODD: Their Stability and Prediction of Internalizing Symptoms and Conduct Problems from Adolescence to Young Adulthood.

To test when the protective effect of internalizing symptoms became similar for youth high and low on externalizing symptoms, we re-estimated six additional growth models changing the specification of the intercept to W1, W2, and W4 - W7.

Probability of use started out lower and increased later for youth low in externalizing symptoms, and hence, the emergence of the protective effect of internalizing symptoms was delayed for these youth.

The first - order effect of internalizing symptoms on the W6 - W7 intercepts was statistically significant and negative, βs = − 2.91 to − 3.12, ps < 0.05.

Although studies have found that the effects of internalizing symptoms on adolescent SU are diminished when statistically controlling for externalizing symptoms (e.g., King et al. 2004), few studies have considered externalizing symptoms as a potential moderator.

Although the proposed interaction was not supported for probability of marijuana use, or for frequency of marijuana use or quantity x frequency of alcohol use, there was evidence for protective first - order effects of internalizing symptoms on these outcomes.

Although we did not have strong a priori reasons to expect that the subdomains of externalizing symptoms (e.g., delinquency, aggression) would differentially moderate the association of internalizing symptoms with SU, we did consider potential unique effects of anxiety and depression symptoms (see Footnote 1), and there was little difference in our findings across these symptom clusters.

Reducing the Risk of Internalizing Symptoms among High - risk Hispanic Youth through a Family Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Because multiple studies of behavioral adjustment in chronically ill children suggest that the inclusion of such items inappropriately inflates rates of internalizing symptoms in this population (La Greca et al., 1995; Liss et al., 1998; Lloyd, Dyer, & Barnett, 2000), the depression and anxiety subscales were used instead.

This indicates that older children reported higher levels of rumination and sleep problems, and lower levels of emotional well - being, and their parents reported higher levels of internalizing symptoms, across measurement occasions.

High levels of externalizing symptoms and low levels of internalizing symptoms were associated with high levels of amount of use among users.

That is, high levels of internalizing symptoms were associated with low frequency of marijuana use and with low quantity x frequency of alcohol use.

Hussong et al. (2011) suggested elevated levels of internalizing symptoms in a circumscribed period of time (e.g., a given month or year) may be less germane to trajectories of SU than chronic or stably high internalizing symptoms.

There is some evidence that subdomains of internalizing symptoms may operate differently in the etiology of adolescent SU (Colder et al. 2010).

That is, the strength and direction of the association between internalizing symptoms and SU seems to depend on whether unique effects of internalizing symptoms are examined above and beyond externalizing symptoms.

Household income was significantly related to two of the six variables: Adolescents from families in the lowest annual income category (< $ 40K / year) had significantly higher levels of internalizing symptoms and significantly higher HbA1c than those from families in the highest income category (> $ 80K / year).

Findings underscore the importance of assessing various types of internalizing symptoms (i.e., controlling for shared construct variance), obtaining children's perceptions of parental style in conjunction with conducting behavioral observations, and including fathers in psychopathology research.

Second, we distinguished between trajectories of probability of use and amount of use for users because the risk and protective status of internalizing symptoms may be different for these outcomes.

Gender differences in mental health symptoms have been traditionally reported in the general population of adolescents, with the prevalence of internalizing symptoms (i.e., depression, anxiety) greater in adolescent girls (Birmaher et al., 1996) and the prevalence of externalizing symptoms (i.e., aggression, conduct problems) greater in boys (Dekovic, Buist, & Reitz, 2004; Leadbeater, Kuperminc, Blatt, & Hertzog, 1999).

In their developmental account, Hussong et al. (2011) posited that youth who experience high levels of internalizing symptoms may be delayed in the onset of SU, but that once initiated, SU would escalate rapidly.

Results supported moderation, but contrary to Maslowsky and Schulenberg (2013), the nature of this interaction suggested a protective effect of internalizing symptoms.

High levels of internalizing symptoms were prospectively associated with low levels of SU, and this protective effect was only evident at high levels of externalizing problems.

Another possibility is that the risk or protective status of internalizing symptoms may depend on whether growth in the probability of use or amount of use is examined as the outcome.

The protective effect of internalizing symptoms that we observed calls into question whether self - medication models of SU are relevant to adolescent SU in the general population.

Fathers» ratings of internalizing symptoms did not differ significantly between intervention and control groups, but when the analysis was restricted to children that began the study with elevated depression levels, intervention children showed a significant decrease compared with control children.

Such a lack of validity for child report, however, may be less true for measures of internalizing symptoms (Holmbeck, Li, Schurman, Friedman, & Coakley, 2002; Silverman & Ollendick, 2005).

Not exact matches

Relational victimization, experienced by boys and girls at similar levels, was related to higher levels of relational aggression and internalizing problems such as symptoms of depression and of anxiety, as well as lower levels of received prosocial behavior like peer support and help (called prosocial support).

Effect of early adversity and childhood internalizing symptoms on brain structure in young men.

Screening for adolescents» internalizing symptoms in primary care: item response theory analysis of the behavior health screen depression, anxiety, and suicidal risk scales.

maladjustment (i.e., a combination of internalizing and externalizing symptoms) as a predictor of

The behavior component is divided into two types of behaviors: internalizing (e.g., depression, anxiety) and externalizing (e.g., oppositional, acting - out behaviors, and attention problems) psychological symptoms.

Methods: Children with PRDs (N = 160 children; 8 - 17 years) were recruited from three pediatric rheumatology centers and completed measures of daily hassles, social support, depressive symptoms, and state and trait anxiety; their parents completed measures of internalizing and externalizing behaviors.