Sentences with phrase «of irrational arguments»

Here are five hallmarks of irrational arguments.

Not exact matches

And those that don't say that stuff instead opting to argue and dissect and article or argument for / about god doesn't show they make any positive claims to the existence of such a being, but instead to show how ridiculous and irrational somethings are.
It was, rather, to show proponents of same - sex marriage that «the other side» is reasonable and that their arguments are worth engaging, rather than dismissing out of hand as irrational and merely or privately religious.
Look, the argument that anti-abortionists are stupid / irrational / inconsistent because they «do nt care» for the baby after birth and all of that is just a non sequitur.
Arguments like the one you made only reinforce their belief that people of faith are irrational and delusional.
The paradox created by attempting to weave together the great contradictions in God's portrayal through the old and new testaments, coupled with the firm assertion that God «never changes», creates a dizzying level of mental gymnastics to try to rationalize what seems to me to be an irrational argument.
This expression of hope in a resurrection for those chosen, comprising «only the best and the worst ’18 of the Jews, did not arise out of any reasoned argument, but on the contrary stemmed from an almost irrational and certainly emotion - filled plea for a final vindication.
You're right... that Rousey «ran» to 35 is debatable... The argument for that is irrational and full of «but she was scurred» but you can debate it.
5) Motyl finally claims that realist arguments against arming Ukraine fail because the obsessive pursuit of Russia's interests in Ukraine is «irrational» (his characterization of Russia escalating the war).
This means they will respond to certain situations with inappropriate levels of anger, for example resulting in road rage or irrational, violent acts such as throwing a television out of a window during an argument with a spouse or parent.
Even if I am fully aware of the conflicts inherent in the irrational arguments for things like God, Country, or finding a «soul mate,» I feel like any good faith investigation into these beliefs must acknowledge that the vast majority of humanity really does believe, or at least wants to believe, in romance and myths.
Given that, the argument that «in the absence of further information we should do nothing», taken to mean «do nothing to the economy» rather than «do nothing to the radiative properties of the atmosphere», is clearly irrational.
I write in an attempt to escape from the loop of irrational assertions with which you are responding to all evidence and logical argument.
He undermines his arguments by attaching them to an irrational paranoid conspiracy / fantasy — that those who disagree with him scientifically are pathological and desirous of runaway warming and doom.
The idea of there being scientists on the one hand, opposed by irrational sceptics on the other has been established so concretely that few editors, peer - reviewers or journalists even bother to ask questions about the content of the consensus, much less about how it is contradicted by the substance of climate sceptics» arguments.
We can find climate scientists who give lower estimates of climate's sensitivity to CO2 whose arguments are better grounded in science than any number of eco-warriors whose arguments are irrational, emotional, and lack any sense of proportion.
But whenever I object to it, I am immediately met by hostile and irrational objections by some of those who favor that argument, so I just drop it, because I'm not wasting my time.
Just as with climate science denial, creationism, etc, once the irrational jump is made and the emotional lock - in occurs, it is followed with a farrago of cherry picking, generalisation and specious arguments.
Whilst on the face of it, a costs argument does not appear completely irrational, increasing state pension age on its own does feel redolent of taking a blunt instrument to the wider problem of an aging population.
The argument that institutional law libraries (an integral and subservient part of the pillars of the Pigs) should be exempt from his dicta would probably have struck him as ludicrous, and irrational as well.
Such males might try to squash the discrepancy in viewpoints by means of a series of questions intended to establish once and for all that the other person is irrational, has a logical flaw in their argument, or is «the crazy one».
Absurdly integral to this discussion, it must be noted that the Competition Bureau and the Tribunal hold the position that: the one on one sharing of the «disputed data» by telephone or email (even with one's own client's) is basically the same as openly exposing said data on the internet, and use this irrational and desperate reasoning to justify their part of their argument for obliging TREB to give away the «disputed data».
With respect to Jorgensen's second argument, the Colorado Court of Appeals cited case law and held that in the absence of some clearly irrational and unreasonable invasion of a member's rights, courts will not review the internal operation and affairs of voluntary organizations.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z