To understand why Behe's argument is so uncontested in the realm of fact, and yet why so many scientists find the
concept of irreducible complexity not only difficult to accept but even impossible to consider, we should start by summarizing the modern understanding of Darwinism, as set out by Richard Dawkins.
There was a lot that Darwin didn't know and if there is some
sort of irreducible complexity, it could wreck Darwin's theory but it would also wreck Intelligent Design.
4) Professor Behe was found to be a charlatan and his
theory of Irreducible Complexity was publically and officially debunked in the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District court trial.
The superficially persuasive argument, later resurrected as intelligent design and its
idea of irreducible complexity, turned out to be very refutable indeed.
The implication he is trying to make is essentially the debunked
notion of irreducible complexity — that complex structures or biological systems could not have evolved because they could not have simpler functional states.
Reading each of the chapters on planetary boundaries puts one in mind of an attempt to use the concept
of irreducible complexity to make an argument for «intelligent design».