Sentences with phrase «of irrelevant data»

Do not write a lot of irrelevant data.

Coordinated the collection and upload of ESI into a web - based review platform to avoid unnecessary manual review of irrelevant data.

Modern e-discovery is fraught with the risks of irrelevant data, poor custodial practices, evidence spoliation, bloated processing costs, and expensive review.

I think Facebook could eventually follow Friendster and Myspace into the heap of irrelevant data silos.

Not exact matches

Meanwhile, Netflix (along with other big streaming players) is very protective of its viewership data, which the streaming service claims is made irrelevant by the fact that Netflix does not rely on ad sales like its traditional TV rivals.

Next time you need to make a decision, spend some time thinking about how much and what type of information you really need before getting carried away by your research and tripping yourself up by focusing on irrelevant data.

Some services can be overwhelming, creating a cascade of messages that disrupt workflow and drown vital data in a stream of irrelevant burps.

In short, the criticism that data caps are blunt instruments with respect to congestion is correct but largely irrelevant, as is the criticism that they don't reflect the marginal cost of moving data.

Either by guesswork or by trawling through loads of enquiry data, most businesses just do not have the time to search for irrelevant keywords and simply end up with a few negative words in their campaigns.

And if it were analyzed, it is unlikely that any government would care, because by that point it would be out of date, even more irrelevant than it is already, and the departments that analyze public data are even more resource - strapped than any of the other groups mentioned.

This occasion is related to other occasions only at its initiation (as prehender) and at its consummation (as datum for prehension) Hence, in principle, its own inner process of becoming is irrelevant to its observable relations.

For the vast majority of infants it is irrelevant except it means that parents are pouring over data points instead of pouring over their babies.

«Use of the Census data was flawed at best, possibly irrelevant,» says Chris Love, a lawyer for Suffolk Police.

«Integrating holography into everyday electronics would make screen size irrelevant — a pop - up 3D hologram can display a wealth of data that doesn't neatly fit on a phone or watch.

In doing so he demonstrates how the intelligence and data sharing pacts of the «Five, Nine and Fourteen eyes» are rendering geographic proximity irrelevant to the formation of coalitions in this new way of war.

While computers efficiently sift through deluges of data, they can also get lost in details that human eyes and brains easily disregard as irrelevant.

Although the French last month published three glossy volumes on the effects of previous tests, the report's authors say that the data released so far are mostly irrelevant or inadequate.

The data infrastructure permits evaluation of a benchmark theory in economics that predicts that individuals should use a combination of cash management, saving, and borrowing to make the timing of income irrelevant for the timing of spending.

Similarly, many studies that attempt to examine the co-variability between Earth's energy budget and temperature (such as in many of the pieces here at RC concerning the Spencer and Lindzen literature) are only as good as the assumptions made about base state of the atmosphere relative to which changes are measured, the «forcing» that is supposedly driving the changes (which are often just things like ENSO, and are irrelevant to radiative - induced changes that will be important for the future), and are limited by short and discontinuous data records.

For example, there is no way to manipulate the number of wears to reflect the fact that the clothes have been worn before; I have 3 years of data that I can not incorporate into the stats, which makes all of the calculations done by the app irrelevant.

By the time they can measure «student A» from the fourth grade through post secondary and beyond, education changes so much through initiatives and new policies that right there the data is irrelevant from one year to the next, and of course from one student to the next!

But for most of the nation's teachers, who do not teach subjects or grades in which value - added data are available, that debate is also largely irrelevant.

We know of no legitimate statistical text that argues it is irrelevant to use tests of statistical significance to guard against random fluctuations in the data - in this case, scores on tests of student performance.

Other data are often just noise: For example, it's interesting that children enrolled in Head Start may be less likely to take to crime as adults, but it's pretty much irrelevant to judging the efficacy of an expensive government program that's failed to show much in terms of student performance.

While some education researchers such as Tom Loveless of the Brookings Institution may want to argue that the PISA data is irrelevant because it supposedly doesn't reflect what American kids are learning in school, the fact that kids from highly educated households (as well as kids whose parents are high school dropouts) are not performing well makes such theorizing seem silly.

I know some of you find numbers irrelevant (which, I must say, worries me), so if long posts about information and data make your eyes cross, then skip to the last few paragraphs of this piece.

Still not seeing why Mike Shatzkin thinks that a hypothetical 40 % - of - net traditional royalty would make all the rest of the data irrelevant... but maybe it's just me.

The book is full of examples of how people are easily fooled by irrelevant data.

In economic modeling, many of the first steps in creating a model are symbolic anyway, so «growth rate,», «change in output», and «economic growth» are used interchangeably to describe changes in GDP because the values either aren't known, irrelevant until later in the project, or pulled from data that describes it using one or several of the previously stated terms.

When presented with 86 years of data, many investors deem the data irrelevant, because they do not have 86 years to live.

And efforts to establish some sort of long term warming trend hidden away due to other factors have required a great many very complex and convoluted statistical calesthenics — all of which have been rendered irrelevant thanks to the recent data «corrections» by Karl et al..

The growth rates the trends are irrelevant as are comparisons, for imho the only data that counts the headline number, becasue that does actually represent Total Accumulated CO2 in the atmosphere at any poit in time, and as such that does therefore represent the actual real scientifically based Climate Forcing of CO2 in the present.

Whether or not any of the data is «discoverable» or not is irrelevant to the question, whether or not the e-mails give you a good image of what has happened.

Of course, I didn't say that the pre-divergence data is «right,» but again, that is irrelevant to the accusations related to climategate.

Their tactics and fallacies include ignoring or distorting mainstream scientific results, cherry - picking data and falsely generalizing, bringing up irrelevant red - herring arguments, demanding unachievable «precision» from mainstream science with the motif «if you don't understand this detail you don't understand anything», overemphasizing and mischaracterizing uncertainties in mainstream science, engaging in polemics and prosecutorial - lawyer Swift - Boat - like attacks on science - and lately even scientists, attacking the usual scientific process, misrepresenting legitimate scientific debate as «no consensus», and overemphasizing details of little significance.

Whether this source is NOAA, foreign weather observatories, or international climate bodies is irrelevant — the author is never a primary source of data unless he is performing experiments, and anyone who has done real science understands this.

Weather you and I agree or disagree it is totally irrelevant, it is not a matter of the opinion, it is fact that the data from Jault Gire and LeMouel (1990) and later reinforced by Bloxham & Jackson (1992) show that 20 % of the Earth's LOD variability is closely correlated to the sunspot magnetic cycle.

Doing a comparison of all data sets with such wide variance in endpoints, and then focusing on one dataset that he used up to 2008 without the 2009 data seems to me to be irrelevant.

The margin of error on the data is at least 0.1 degrees above or below, meaning that even the dubious GISS «warmest on record» data showed the «warmest on record» by such a tiny margin as to be literally statistically and scientifically irrelevant.

Lovely but irrelevant photos of polar bears on ice floes, massaged temperature data, massaged CO2 data, massaged global climate models, and photo - shopped scenes of Antarctica don't add to their credibility either.

Apart from the pointless and potentially large time cost imposed by this refusal, the task of aggregating PCMDI data with which we are unfamiliar would create the risk of introducing irrelevant collation errors or mismatched averaging steps, leading to superfluous controversy should our results not replicate theirs.

First, reducing the data set (in this case, the AVHRR data) to the first M eigenvalues is irrelevant insofar as the choice of infilling algorithm is concerned.

The point is that this observation is not very relevant if the outcome comes from a combination of relevant and persistently warming data from areas where the temperature is strongly correlated with increase in the heat content of oceans, atmosphere and continental topmost layers, and almost totally irrelevant data from areas and seasons where and when exceptionally great natural variability of surface temperatures makes these temperatures essentially irrelevant for the determination of longterm trends.

I know of no example whereby the studies of satellite data by Spencer are pseudoscience, and I suspect you don't either (drum roll to announce your responses with irrelevant references to Spencer's religious beliefs).

That usage is in line with the rest of your article, though — you are a very good writer, and I believe yo write for exactly the impact yo want — and does nt address the transect stuff, nor the irrelevant to Parker data showing a UHI (not a trend), nor the quote mine.

They are nitpicking over issues analogous to the pressing questions of the times, such as whether witches actually fly or imagine that they fly, whether they fly on broomsticks or on wilow branches, and whether they consort with the Devil or only think they do.Their predecessors, they declared the science settled, i.e., witches exist and cause disease and cold weather, but assumed the «danger» still exists and posed faux disagreements over irrelevant «data» and «mysteries» to provide themselves with jobs.

No: that is the beauty of using top of atmosphere radiative balance data — it automatically reflects the flow of heat into the ocean, so thermal inertia of the oceans is irrelevant to the estimate of equilibrium climate sensitivity that it provides, unlike with virtally all other instrumental methods.

Kudos to him for responding to Goddard, especially after Goddard misrepresented the NSIDC data in a piece described by Meier as: -... the article consists almost entirely of misleading, irrelevant, or erroneous information about Arctic sea ice that add nothing to the understanding of the significant long - term decline that is being observed.»

This whole series from National Geographic has from start to finish been based on a combination of irrelevant, fake and cherry picked data.

Stockwell's conclusion is irrelevant or wrong because his hypothesis is queerly chosen and his highly selective method ignores the most informative bits of data.