Sentences with phrase «of irrelevant documents»

The cull feature draws on this interface to allow efficient removal of irrelevant documents or document sets, which helps organizations reduce the amount of material that must be processed.

More than just for the producing party, the party receiving the documents could potentially bear significant costs to review thousands of pages of irrelevant documents.

Not exact matches

Gray and screenwriters Jonathan Herman and Andrea Berloff at times feel too handcuffed to the group's well - documented history, breaking up the rhythm of the story to check off a minor, well - documented detail of the journey, no matter how emotionally irrelevant it may be.

Toward that end, the superintendent is trying to raise $ 250,000 to support the work of revising the state's Education Technology Plan - a document so out of date and irrelevant that many Capitol insiders are unaware of its existence.

The document begins by making a number of irrelevant and misleading statements about human carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions.

Accusations of corrupt fossil fuel industry influence over skeptic climate scientists are irrelevant material — worthless — in the absence of any physical evidence (full context document scans, undercover video / audio transcripts, leaked emails, money - transfer receipts) proving such skeptics were paid and orchestrated to lie about the certainty of catastrophic man - caused global warming.

[37] While Pima County Superior Court Judge James Marner had said the university did not abuse its discretion in concluding that disclosing the documents would not be in the best interests of the state, appellate Judge Joseph Howard said it was legally irrelevant what university officials thought was appropriate to disclose.

As WSJ reports, tech companies are developing tools that can perform many tasks previously handled by teams of attorneys — such as weeding out duplicate or irrelevant material and identifying privileged documents.

In some cases, printing may be appropriate, but the best approach in all cases is to do some basic analysis of the data first: run a keyword search, then sort and de-duplicate data to eliminate irrelevant material before embarking on a formal document review.

However, eight of those reasons were circumstances that arose after the commencement of the action and were thus irrelevant to the analysis (the defendant's offer to settle; the defendant's failure to apply to move the action to the Small Claims Court; the defendant's denial of liability for the plaintiff's injury; the insurer's characterization of the collision as low impact; the exchange of 60 documents; the defendant's motion for a Rule 66 hearing and eventual removal; a Rule 28 examination of a witness; and the absence of expert evidence tendered by the defendant).

In particular, the notion of an «original» document, as contemplated by the «best evidence» rule, was not helpful in the electronic world, being either meaningless or irrelevant to the purpose of the rule.

First, search results may include documents that contain the query term but are irrelevant because the user intended a different sense (or meaning) of that query term that term matching fails to distinguish.

First, it was said, when experts were being instructed nothing relevant should be omitted but that care be taken that unnecessary or irrelevant material should be rigorously excluded and that experts should be spared files of documents which were peripheral to their task.

In light of a number of recent court decisions on e-discovery, counsel and clients must consider, inter alia, the scope of what should be produced in discovery (e.g. whether entire hard drives or other devices need to be produced), employees» expectation of privacy in devices owned by their employer, whether irrelevant personal information should be redacted, who can review information produced in discovery, and the location where documents can be reviewed.

Some of the documents were irrelevant, some were prejudicial, and some were inflammatory.

As well as needing simultaneous emergency measures to be taken on both sides of the Scottish / English border in order to prevent Police Scotland taking privileged and irrelevant documents out of the jurisdiction, this case raises complex and important issues concerning cross-border criminal enforcement arising in the context of civil disputes.

This applies both where that advice is limited in time, eg until after a criminal defence statement has been filed and served and, worse still, the advice is given not to make such a response at all; • (f) the date on which a party to care proceedings is to file and serve a criminal defence statement in linked criminal proceedings is wholly irrelevant to the court's determination of the date on which that party should file and serve a response to threshold and / or to file and serve a narrative statement in the care proceedings; • (g) the mere fact that a party is ordered to file and serve a response to threshold and / or to file and serve a narrative statement before the date a criminal defence statement is to be filed and served in criminal proceedings is not a ground for failing to comply with the former order; • (h) it [is not] a ground for an application to extend the time for compliance with an order to file and serve a response to threshold and / or to file and serve a narrative statement until a date after the criminal defence statement has been filed and served; and • (i) any issue about alleged prejudice to a defendant in criminal proceedings based on him being required to file and serve a response to threshold and / or to file and serve a narrative statement before the date of a criminal defence statement is to be filed and served, or at all, only arises and is only potentially relevant if and when an application is made by the police and / or a co-accused for statements and documents filed in the family proceedings to be disclosed into linked criminal proceedings [see Re C (A Minor)(Care Proceedings: Disclosure)[1997] Fam 76, [1997] 2 WLR 322, sub nom Re EC (Disclosure of Material)[1996] 2 FLR 725, CA].

Quality control (QC) measures to prevent these types of mistakes might involve a system by which review teams conduct different levels of review to verify accuracy of other reviewers, or by sampling certain categories, maybe reviewing one document for every 10 deemed irrelevant and looking for mistakes, which may expose larger issues such as a consistently overlooked keyword.

Playing uncivil, tactical, inappropriate, old - school, trial by ambush games like: threatening to require proof of obviously valid records, holding back important documents until the last second, failing to fulfil undertakings until the eve of trial, delivering new expert's reports during the trial, saying untrue things to counsel opposite (whether knowingly or not), failing to prepare examinations in advance to «wing it» at trial, refusing to agree to the admissibility of relevant documents while requiring changes to be made to irrelevant ones, refusing to share costs of joint expenses, refusing to cooperate on court ordered process matters, are all wrongful.

This enables clients to use Predictive Discovery to assist in a wide range of tasks, including prioritizing documents in the collection based on relevance, culling out pools of largely irrelevant materials, cross checking manual attorney review and isolating key terms in a large collection of coded documents.

The software can quickly scan millions of documents and classify them as relevant or irrelevant by comparing them against sample documents, which can be expanded and altered until lawyers are satisfied with the results,

This permitted us to identify and pull out large groups of privileged and irrelevant documents which would otherwise have required a page by page, linear, bilingual review.

In addition, the conceptual tool supported «learning» of nuanced concepts — necessary in this case to permit teasing out the irrelevant and privileged documents mixed in with the relevant document set.

However, in addition to classifying and clustering documents into piles of relevant and irrelevant documents there are «predictive coding» techniques that can be used to infer legal consequences and outcomes for clients, for example, identifying elements of risk, or degrees of liability, etc..

Dozens of types of data storage medium exist, and most of the data does not come in neatly labeled files, folders and boxes, but as unstructured data mixed in with email invites to hockey games, personal documents, relevant documents saved into the wrong folder, proprietary databases which contain data that is largely irrelevant (and sensitive to boot!)

The onus — not a heavy one — is on the person seeking to limit disclosure, to adduce evidence that satisfies the court that the document in question is likely to be irrelevant to the proof of a material fact.

DeNISTing decreases the amount of time to review ESI and removes irrelevant files from the processing set of useable documents and can dramatically reduce the size of any given collection.

QuickCull enables in - house legal teams to r remove duplicates and grossly irrelevant prior to legal review, minimizing the burden and cost of unnecessary document review.

One of the things that decision makers should keep in mind is the unnecessary inclusion of irrelevant sensitive personal information in decisions and in publicly available documents.

Therefore unnecessarily excessive, irrelevant or disordered exhibition of documents by the parties shall be evaluated by Consob as a negative element in assessing the degree of cooperation.

It found that the Code is paramount over statutory immunity provisions, that deliberative secrecy was irrelevant when the complainant only sought to rely on documents that were already disclosed, and that the rule of collateral attack was restricted to situations where a decision was sought to be overturned as opposed to having its facts re-litigated (¶ ¶ 64 - 66).

The page itself consists of a form that must be filled out by the individual where he or she must supply the following information: (1) name used to search, (2) full name of requester, (3) contact e-mail address, (4) URLs for results they want removed, (5) an explanation of why those results are irrelevant, out - dated, or otherwise objectionable, and (6) a legible copy of a document that verifies the individual's identity so as to allow Google to ensure the authenticity of his or her request.

The existence of a document is essentially irrelevant.

Panelists noted the difficulties of choosing key words, reporting that «[e] ven if you have a brilliant, absolutely focussed search, you are still going to end up with too many documents to review and within those there will still be a very large proportion of irrelevant material.»

The second aspect is the solution's «cull» feature, which represents an easy way to remove irrelevant documents from the pool of documents to be processed.

The more of the irrelevant information you have on the document, the more chances that employers will not be able to quickly find the relevant facts.

The same thing with resumes (remember they are sales documents or marketing tools)-- including irrelevant (for employer) information and listing too much of it will become a turnoff.

Rather than focusing on her irrelevant experience, she positions her education section in the center of her document and provides details concerning her pertinent coursework.

Also, really absurdly nitpicky note: under the «Don't include irrelevant info» paragraph it looks like the «arraignments» was written (def: A criminal proceeding at which the defendant is officially called before a court of competent jurisdiction, informed of the offense charged in the complaint, information, indictment, or other charging document, and asked to enter a plea of guilty, not guilty, or as otherwise permitted by law.

If you are switching careers, enlist the help of a professional resume writer to devise a document that highlights your transferable skills and minimizes irrelevant information.

Leave irrelevant non-industry work experiences, skills, and education out of your document.

You may have a great summary statement and impressive work experience, but the following mistakes will make your document look irrelevant, overly wordy, and out of date.