In light of this increasingly complex litigation, questions have been raised about the ability
of judges or juries to make reasoned decisions.
Arbitration uses a neutral arbitrator instead
of a judge or jury, and is subject to very limited review by courts.
However, proving a case against a negligent truck driver or trucking company may not be as easy as putting all available evidence in front
of the judge or jury.
If the case is not settled, the personal injury lawyer can represent you in court, prepare discovery documents, prepare motions for court consideration and present a case in front
of a judge or jury that outlines how the accident happened and how the defendant is responsible for the damages that you sustained.
An attorney can help accident victims find and present expert witnesses to testify in front
of a judge or jury.
Importantly, Indiana appellate courts will not revisit factual determinations
of a judge or jury.
In Collaborative Divorce, you and your spouse will not leave your fates in the hands
of a judge or a jury.
However, you have the right to take your case to trial and put the matter in the hands
of a judge or jury.
I see attorneys flounder with objection arguments on a regular basis, which makes them look weak in front
of a judge or jury, even if their objection is spot on.
If negotiations fail, we are skilled trial attorneys who can accurately defend you in front
of a judge or jury.
We will use the information and evidence we gather to (1) get charges against you reduced or dropped, (2) negotiate plea agreements, and / or (3) argue your case in front
of a judge or jury.
It will enable you to win in front
of a judge or jury, it will enable you to instill confidence in your clients, and it will enable you to set yourself apart from your colleagues.
Personal injury lawyers drawn to the attention
of the judge or jury in each case a great many authorities on the question of awards for injuries bearing some resemblance to the case at hand.
However, succeeding in these cases is not as easy as putting all available evidence in front
of a judge or jury.
They can settle or «stipulate» to some aspects of the lawsuit, leaving others in the hands
of the judge or jury.
Instead
of a judge or jury deciding the matter, one or more...
If you proceed through trial and your attorney argues your case in front
of a judge or jury, you will receive a verdict.
Finding a Lawyer That Has Experience Defending Cases Similar to Yours When you are sitting in front
of a judge or jury, you are basically looking to these people to make decisions that are going to affect your life.
An expert's opinion is admissible to furnish the Court with scientific information which is likely to be outside the experience and knowledge
of a judge or jury.
Expert evidence is limited to information which is likely outside the experience and knowledge
of a judge or jury.
Arbitration uses a neutral arbitrator instead
of a judge or jury, allows for more limited discovery than in court, and is subject to very limited review by courts.
Prior to disputing a traffic ticket in front
of a judge or a jury, drivers will have adequate time to prepare their defense.
Not exact matches
The series
of hearings will determine whether he faces life in prison
or the death penalty, a decision to be made after family and friends testify to
judge and
jury about their interactions with the mystery man.
Winners are found this way: First, the Product
of the Year Canada
jury carefully selects the finalists — that is, products that meet
or exceed innovation standards — which are then categorized and
judged by an online survey, on behalf
of Rogers Insights and conducted by TNS,
of thousands
of regular Canadian shoppers.
Instead
of a
jury of your peers
or an impartial
judge, the decisionmaker in arbitration proceedings is often an individual hired by the company.
There is no presentation
of evidence from both parties, there are no legally - appointed
juries or judges, and very little eyewitness testimony is presented.
Quite apart from indications born
of biblical faith, it is impossible to imagine a society in which no research
of any kind could be done until the researcher had demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt to a
judge or a
jury or a committee that it should be done.
I am sure that if anyone were charged with a crime,
or is on trial, I am sure that if any
of those lines were used in the presence
of a police officer,
judge,
jury, etc., that person would be ticking off that person and hurting his own case.
Most obvious is the discretion in sentencing where if a crime has a State penalty
of 10 to 15 years and it's up to the
judge or jury as to the actual sentence handed down then the intent
of the crime is often debated and used in the decision.
I'm condemning
judge,
jury and executioner courtesy
of the lynch mob... You
or I don't know their relationship....
Mediation is a non-adversarial alternative to divorce litigation wherein the parties work together, with the help
of a neutral third party «mediator,» to determine their own outcome, rather than leaving these important decisions to
judge or jury.
§ 29A.100 (2007) directs
judges at all levels
of the court to excuse women who are breastfeeding
or expressing breast milk from
jury service until the child is no longer nursing.
A list
of the questions asked by the
jury to the
judge includes one example in which they asked if a juror can «come to a verdict based on a reason that was not presented in court and has no facts
or evidence to support it».
Concessions last week giving the final say over whether an inquest should be held without a
jury led to a spat over whether
or not
judges would act independently
of the government.
The governor's reforms would allow district attorneys like Mr. Donovan to issue a report
or letter
of fact outlining what occurred in closed grand
jury room in cases
of police killings, without having to beseech a
judge to release that information.
Note that there is no relationship (at least legally) between the death penalty and use
of weapons by police force; even in countries with death penalty police follows the same Rules
of Engagement (use weapon as self - defense
or when other people are in danger), death penalty is stablished by a
jury or judge (police is a law enforcement agency, sentences are issued by
judges or juries)
In a ruling Friday night, U.S. District
Judge Joan M. Azrack rejected the motion, finding that while some
of the questions and answers were either inappropriate
or «potentially inappropriate,» they and others like them would be barred from
jury deliberations.
Another note also emerged from the
jury room, asking the
judge to clarify whether
or not giving out New York State funds in exchange for something else is illegal — and whether there was a written code
of conduct that addressed that issue.
«The
jury will decide whose version
of what happened, what did not happen, is likely
or not,» Newark federal
judge William Walls ruled on Monday.
Judge Walls said the Newark federal
jury could determine that some
of Menendez's meetings were official acts if they feel he «sought to pressure
or advise» other officials to take action on behalf
of Melgen.
While a
judge,
jury or, more likely, a guilty plea will ultimately determine Silver's suitability for prison, the facts presented by prosecutors convict him beyond any doubt
of abusing his office for personal enrichment.
Whatever the nuances
of the current research, the job
of the experts brought into a case by prosecutors and defense attorneys «is to make the
judge or the
jury believe that their version
of the science is true and correct and should win the case,» Rothstein said.
This uneasiness with parties» experts is heightened by the fact that the adversarial system, relying as it does on critical cross-examination to expose weaknesses in a witness» testimony, is often ill suited to educating the trier
of fact, whether it be
judge or jury.
You can either select a three - person
jury composed entirely
of coin flippers — best out
of three determines the verdict —
or you can have the
judge flip a single coin for the decision.
Testimony is the verbal statement
of a witness, under oath, to the
judge or jury.
Yet unlike those film's heroes, Richard is neither a Christ figure (in one scene he expressly denies that he is Jesus —
or indeed the Devil), nor an agent
of divine justice (the film's first line is «God will forgive them, He'll forgive them and allow them into heaven — I can't live with that»)-- and while there is no doubt that his
judge -
jury - and - executioner attitude towards vigilantism is entirely reactionary, both his morality and his sanity come to be called into question by the film.
To get us all started, we've compiled a list
of the titles we think are the strongest contenders to put in an appearance on the Croisette, whether In Competition (to be
judged by a
Jury presided over this year by Palme d'
Or winner Jane Campion)
or in one
of the headache - inducing number
of sidebars, after the glitzy gala premiere
of «Grace
of Monaco» kicks off proceedings in earnest on May 14th.
The character is a man who's spent his entire life killing people, protecting his own,
or destroying the lives
of others, as he became a
judge and
jury on his own time.
They will prepare a minimum three - paragraph opinion for the
judge and
jury, citing at least three pieces
of evidence to support their position for
or against Roger.
You should then run the trial a couple
of times, so that every student participates at least once as either
judge,
jury, prosecution,
or defense.