Sentences with phrase «of judgments in»

In 2007 the European Community signed a treaty on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters with Iceland, Norway and Switzerland.

The recognition and enforcement of maintenance orders in EU member states was governed by Regulation 44/2001 of December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters.

There have been instances of judgments in the hundreds of thousands of dollars, so Bodily Injury Liability coverage is well worth the investment.

The consultation, A Green Paper on Improving the Efficiency of the Enforcement of Judgments in the European Union: The Attachment of Bank Accounts, runs until 31 March 2007.

There was little that remained private following publication of the judgments in the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court and the media reporting of the case;

The issue before the Court of Appeal in Phillips was whether the English court or the Swiss court, in which proceedings had also been issued by the opposing party, had first become «seised of the matter» under Art 21 of the Lugano Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters 1988.

In addition it is important to verify the possibility of recognition of judgments in the countries of both contracting.

Pursuant to Article 59 (2)(a) of the Council Regulation concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, Finland hereby declares that the Convention of 6 February 1931 between Finland, Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Sweden comprising international private law provisions on marriage, adoption and guardianship, together with the Final Protocol thereto, will apply in full in relations between Finland and Sweden, in place of the rules of the Regulation.

Pursuant to Article 59 (2)(a) of the Council Regulation concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, Sweden hereby declares that the Convention of 6 February 1931 between Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden comprising international private law provisions on marriage, adoption and guardianship, together with the Final Protocol thereto, will apply in full in relations between Sweden and Finland, in place of the rules of the Regulation.

Measures relating to the child's property which do not concern the protection of the child should continue to be governed by Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (7).

(12) Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000.

The present case concerned the rules on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters.

concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000

In this case, rules on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters are discussed.

Declarations by Sweden and Finland pursuant to Article 59 (2)(a) of the Council Regulation concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000.

EU Regulation 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Brussels Regulation) applicable to judgments given in legal proceedings instituted before 10 January 2015.

Convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters signed in Lugano on 30 October 2007 (Lugano Convention).

EU Regulation 1215/2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Brussels Recast Regulation) applicable to legal proceedings instituted on or after 10 January 2015.

Reciprocal enforcement of judgments in Abu Dhabi and ADGM free zone: a new Memorandum of Understanding («MoU») sets out the framework for the reciprocal enforcement of judgments, decisions and orders and the arbitral awards ratified or recognised by the onshore civil law courts in Abu Dhabi and the common law courts in Abu Dhabi's financial free zone, ADGM.

(5) Brussels Convention of 27 September 1968 on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (OJ L 299, 13.12.1972, p. 32; consolidated version, OJ C 27, 26.1.1998, p. 1).

The Brussels I (recast), also known by its less pithy, formal title, Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 «on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast)», partially entered into force on 10 January 2013 and became fully applicable on 10 January 2015.

It is incompatible with Council Regulation No 44 / 2001 / EC (jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters) for a court of a member state to make an order to restrain a person from commencing or continuing proceedings before the courts of another member state on the ground that such proceedings would be contrary to an arbitration agreement.

This provision was first interpreted in Bier v Mines de potasse d'Alsace (then still under the pre-predecessor of the Regulation, the Brussels Convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters).

The Recast Brussels Regulation (Council Regulation (EU) 1215/2012) on jurisdiction and the recognition of judgments in civil and commercial matters for proceedings commenced on or after 10 January 2015; or

This is because recognition of the jurisdiction of the English courts and the enforcement of its judgments in Europe currently depend primarily on the Brussels I Recast Regulation.

Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (the «Recast Regulation») currently ensures that jurisdiction agreements contained in contracts are respected by all EU Member States.

Tipping, McGrath and Gault JJ («the majority judgment») undertook a fairly lengthy review of the judgments in Challenge.

After the EU acquired competence in this area, it adopted rules within this area itself, the latest being Regulation 2201/2003 (the Brussels IIa Regulation) on the recognition of judgments in matrimonial matters.

It covers such measures as Regulation 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (the Brussels I Regulation), Regulation 2201/2003 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and matters of parental responsibility (the Brussels II bis Regulation) or Regulation 864/2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (the Rome II Regulation).

From 10 January 2015, Regulation (EU) 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Brussels Regulation (recast)-RRB- applies.

Nearly half of the judgments in which the Court found a violation included a violation of Article 6, whether on account of the fairness or the length of the proceedings.

But there is always a certain amount of judgment in forecasting, and there is no benchmark for analyzing the Trump effect.

That element of judgment in weighing financial stability considerations, including the implications of our own actions, is central to our risk - management approach to monetary policy.

Shkreli and MSMB Capital had entered into a settlement agreement with Merrill Lynch that required Shkreli and MSMB Capital to execute confessions of judgment in favor of Merrill Lynch.

As part of the settlement, Shkreli signed confessions of judgment in favor of Merrill Lynch on behalf of himself personally and MSMB Capital, each in the amount of $ 7,037,905.

Despite all influences to the contrary, it lifted a standard of judgment in the light of which the Christian conscience at its best could not be content with social evil.

One of the most graphic pictures of judgment in the Bible.

Also appealing is Epstein's assertion of judgment in such matters as dress («The baseball cap marks a steep decline in elegant male attire» and «The notion of having shined shoes speaks to holding up standards, even if in a very minor way»).

Denouncing as sentimentality the attitude of being always ready to understand but not to judge, they proceed to describe a kind of Protestant moralism that weighs in heavily on the side of judgment in the gospel balance between grace and judgment.

Moreover, how is it possible to read the reference to «the power of modern means of destruction» without recalling the role of this judgment in leading to the novel idea of a presumption against war?

On the other hand, those on the «more supportive» end of the spectrum does not always present all the times that God «raising up a leader» is a form of judgment in the Bible: including Israel's King Saul, Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon (Jeremiah 43:10), Tiglath - Pileser of Assyria (Isaiah 10:5 - 11).

Reception is not a mere realization of the relation «secundum sub et supra»: it includes a degree of consent, and possibly of judgment in which the life of a body is expressed which brings into play its own, original spiritual resources.

It was inevitable, perhaps, that the «culture wars» — the debate that continues to rage over the impact of political correctness, multiculturalism, and their allied ideologies — would spawn a genre of liberal apologetics designed to exonerate liberalism itself from its role in abetting the establishment of radical doctrine as a mandatory standard of judgment in mainstream cultural life.

The term connects with «justice,» as is realized in liberation theology, as well as with themes of judgment in both testaments.

There will always be differences of judgment in the Christian group on specific political and social issues.

However, this modified sense is completely required by the sort of judgment in which the reflexive act apprehends itself when undertaking to itemize the meaning of its act of divestment (depouillement) by submitting it to the grille of a criteriology of the divine.

Those nations must submit themselves to adjudication with foreign corporations in a court of judgment in which the nation and the corporation are treated as equals.

It would be a time of judgment in which the wicked and the enemies of God would be obliterated and annihilated.

In fact, though there are several different times and forms of judgment in the Bible, the only one Christians will face is the judgment seat of Christ, sometimes called the Bema.

A proposition emerges in the analysis of a judgment; it is the datum of the judgment in abstraction from the judging subject and from the subjective form.