Decisions
of judicial bodies may be regarded as carrying greater (political rather than legal) authority than that of arbitral tribunals.
Not exact matches
A
judicial review («JR») is a type
of court proceeding in which a judge reviews the lawfulness
of a decision or action made by a public
body; they are a challenge to the way in which a decision has been made, rather than the conclusion reached.
None
of the Reporting Persons nor any manager or executive officer
of the Reporting Persons, has, during the past five years, (a) been convicted in a criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations or similar misdemeanors), or (b) been a party to a civil proceeding
of a
judicial or administrative
body of competent jurisdiction and as a result
of such proceeding was or is subject to a judgment, decree or final order enjoining future violations
of, or prohibiting, or mandating activities subject to, Federal or State securities laws or a finding
of any violation with respect to such laws.
The Court,
of course, is not just a
judicial body but also a political one.
The American democratic procedures that have shaped the practice
of Presbyterian polity were developed for ongoing legislative and
judicial bodies, not for a one - week - and - done meeting
of persons unfamiliar with both the matters at hand and each other.
Are not todays social circles being publically opened up giving governing
bodies a «look see» into today's yes segregated socialists in order for governing
judicial powers to stay abreast
of seminary socialists currents ongoing ways?
The Anglo - American idea... means that the party who does not abide by certain specific decrees emanating from a
judicial body is a contumacious person and may, as a rule, be held in contempt
of court, fined and jailed... Now, this very concept
of contempt simply does not belong to the world
of ideas
of a Latin lawyer.
On this hill met the chief council
of Athens, which served as a forum to appraise various opinions being given the people and also as a
judicial body.
Two families threatened the school with legal action and
judicial review proceedings against the governing
body of St Olave's were initiated.
Unconscionable conduct (agrees with NFF that they have not provided protection and support reforms «to provide transparency in the supply chain» and recognise that «certain classes
of suppliers... are predisposed to suffering from a special disadvantage...»; misuse
of market power (legal framework must «level the balance
of market power in negotiations...», «ensure transparency in the transmission
of market prices» and «not allow for final market risks to be borne by the primary producer» and provide «transparency
of contract processes» - specifically, Canegrowers supports effects test and a process giving ACCC greater power to «regulate anti-competitive behaviour and impose penalties», shifting «the decisions framework from the
judicial system to a regulatory system» which would make it more accessible to small producers); collective bargaining (notes limits
of Sugar Industry Act (Qld); authorisation and notification approval costly and limited and not a viable alternative - peak
bodies should be able to «commence and progress collective bargaining with mills on behalf
of their members» and current threshold too restrictive)» competitive neutrality (mixed outcomes - perverse outcomes in the case
of natural monopolies - suggest remove «application
of competitive neutrality provisions to natural monopoly essential services»)
The state Commission on
Judicial Nomination has begun the formal process
of filling the seat on the state Court
of Appeals left empty by the death
of Judge Sheila Abdus - Salaam, whose
body was retrieved from the Hudson River west
of her home in Harlem last Wednesday.
Even if you can afford a
judicial review, reforms will make it easier for public
bodies to escape a full examination
of whether or not they behaved in accordance with law.
Judicial review underpins the rule
of law and is central to our constitutional make - up, in which parliament sets out the laws, public
bodies implement them and courts make sure that this implementation complies with the law.
The report shall be delivered at least ten days prior to the following times: (A) the first day for circulating designating petitions in the case
of an elective position; (B) the meeting date
of the
Judicial Nominating Convention or other body nominating a candidate for elective judicial positions; or (C) the date any candidate is to be proposed for appointment for any such judicial position;, or (D) if the vacancy in such position occurs at such a time as to make it impossible to comply with the aforesaid timetable, the panel shall deliver its report as expeditiously as p
Judicial Nominating Convention or other
body nominating a candidate for elective
judicial positions; or (C) the date any candidate is to be proposed for appointment for any such judicial position;, or (D) if the vacancy in such position occurs at such a time as to make it impossible to comply with the aforesaid timetable, the panel shall deliver its report as expeditiously as p
judicial positions; or (C) the date any candidate is to be proposed for appointment for any such
judicial position;, or (D) if the vacancy in such position occurs at such a time as to make it impossible to comply with the aforesaid timetable, the panel shall deliver its report as expeditiously as p
judicial position;, or (D) if the vacancy in such position occurs at such a time as to make it impossible to comply with the aforesaid timetable, the panel shall deliver its report as expeditiously as possible.
Reforms to
judicial review have severely hindered the ability
of the public or charities to challenge the actions
of public
bodies.
President Obama has been clear that US work in this area is fully overseen and authorised by Congress and relevant
judicial bodies, and that his administration is committed to respecting the civil liberties and privacy
of its citizens.
On the one hand it is eager to protect its privileges as a self - governing
body, free from the claws
of the judiciary, court restraint or
judicial review.
The Ministry
of Justice plans to tighten the test that needs to be passed before a
judicial review can be brought to challenge decisions by the Government and public
bodies» — The Times (#)
The highest
judicial body is the Supreme Tribunal
of Justice or Tribunal Supremo de Justicia, whose magistrates are elected by parliament for a single two - year term.
«If you weren't going to have some sort
of independent
body that would have had the time to invest in that effort, to hand it over to the
judicial branch with a little bit
of time to absorb all the nuances was difficult.»
The statement read in part, «The National
Judicial Council's committee on the monitoring
of alleged corruption cases in court has resolved to actively engage prosecutorial
bodies like the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and the Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission in furtherance
of its mandate.
Mallam Shekarau who spoke to the press after his release from the custody
of Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in Kano said he is ready to defend himself before any
judicial body or court
of law.
New Queens Democrats, which in several months has modestly grown to nearly two dozen members, is now focused on supporting other progressives who want to run for county committee, a massive
body of representatives from each election district that meets biennially, but has few concrete powers aside from helping to select candidates for special elections and nominating
judicial candidates.
The National
Judicial Council (NJC) Committee on the monitoring
of alleged corruption cases in Court has resolved to actively engage prosecutorial
bodies like the...
Once we get beyond the idea that assessment is more than just quizzes and tests — and that it's the documentation
of whereby you make this case that the student has done something significant — this
body of evidence, if we want to stick with that
judicial metaphor, proves the student actually learned something.
The decisions
of public
bodies, such as the Secretary
of State (and therefore
of RSCs where they assume the powers
of the Secretary
of State), local authorities and schools can be challenged by way
of judicial review and other appropriate proceedings in the High Court.
The city encompasses notably the
judicial and administrative
bodies of the Eastern Province.
In this new
body of work consisting
of sculptures, works on paper, and video, Ward articulates a dialogue surrounding the idea
of support — physical, spiritual, social, and
judicial — while introducing contemplation
of everyday objects.
[1] The painting was subsequently placed near Rehnquist's coffin when his
body lay in state after his death in 2005; the New York Times described the painting as showing «the four gold stripes with which the chief justice decorated each sleeve
of his
judicial robe and depicts him with a slightly bemused expression».
Efforts being made by professional
bodies to encourage applicants from a wider range
of professional backgrounds for
judicial roles.
Like Omar says, if there is a large enough
body of people that are aware
of some fact, then that fact is «notorious» and the judge can properly take
judicial notice
of it.
These are based on the AC which excludes in its Article 2 (2)
bodies acting in a
judicial capacity from the concept
of a public authority.
The existence
of unresolved
judicial review proceedings can cause significant problems for a public
body even where a party does not make an application for interim relief.
Judicial review is concerned with whether these
bodies have properly acted within their jurisdiction and thus each case will require a detailed analysis
of the governing statute and the action purportedly taken under it.
One is the ability
of a decision making
body to participate in or commence
judicial review proceedings.
The
body of law based on the English legal system, as distinct from a civil - law (such as French) system, often derived from
judicial decisions, rather than from statutes or constitutions.
The deputy principal then made an application to the High Court to review this decision, by way
of judicial review (a review procedure for decisions / actions
of public
bodies).
Two stern responses arrived last week from the Federal Court
of Appeal, the
body which deals more than any other with
judicial review
of -LSB-...] Read more
Meanwhile, it is centralized in another aspect — as the courts have no cohesion as an independent
body of government, they are subject to executive control, and judges may seek the advice
of an executive
judicial committee and be subject to removal for making independent determinations.
By James Cooper www.selfreplawyer.ca In the decade since the Canadian
Judicial Council published its Statement
of Principles on Self - Represented Litigants and Accused Persons, there has been a developing
body of case law across Ontario that recognizes the obligation
of trial judges to sensitize themselves to the unique needs
of litigants who represent themselves at court.
Marc Beaumont is experienced in acting on appeal from a number
of regulatory
bodies and in
judicial review challenges in the High Court.
Several states have seen legislative efforts to change the composition and role / function
of their
judicial disciplinary
bodies in 2011.
Members have acted for claimants and defendants in
judicial review challenges to the exercise
of powers both within the NHS, and as between the NHS and other
bodies such as social services.
Media reports indicate much
of the testimony heard before a Tennessee committee regarding that state's
judicial disciplinary
body focused on disagreements with the decisions rendered by judges as well.
They have sat on
bodies such as the Council
of the Inns
of Court, and have acted in the high - profile recent
judicial review challenges relating to the Bar Standards Board, QASA, and the Legal Ombudsman (Office for Legal Complaints).
Exercising the profession as a Supreme Court lawyer gives me the opportunity to confront with the highest
judicial body, entrusted with the role
of guaranteeing uniformity at national level in the interpretation and application
of the rules that form the Italian legal system.
He said he hoped the Senior Salaries Review
Body's Major Review
of the
judicial salary structure and levels, due to report by June 2018, would address pay and pensions concerns.
The Court first pointed out that «while the treaties do not contain any provision to the effect that powers may be conferred on a Union
body, office or agency, a number
of provisions in the FEU Treaty none the less presuppose that such a possibility exists» (para 79) and referred to articles 263, 265, 267 and 277 TFEU which make clear that acts
of such EU
bodies are subject to
judicial review by the Court.
For this reason, where a church or religious
body asserts, because
of its ethos, that religious belief constitutes a genuine occupational requirement for employment, it must at least «be possible for such an assertion to be the subject, if need be,
of effective
judicial review by which it can be ensured that the criteria set out in Article 4 (2)
of that directive are satisfied in the particular case.»
However, David Thomas, doyen
of sentencing experts, having expressed his opposition to the whole idea
of a Sentencing Commission, said that if one was established, he had «grave doubts about the wisdom
of involving serving senior judges in the activities
of such a
body... as there is a tendency to confuse the roles
of the judges in their different capacities and a consequent tendency to compromise
judicial independence.»