Sentences with phrase «of junk scientists»

The only way CO2 could warm a body of air would be if convection was prevented (in the case of junk scientists, ignored).

By the way, were Richard Feynman around today he would have humiliated the current crop of junk scientists so badly that they would have to find honest work

Not exact matches

I know CNN and others keep trying to convince America that we are stupid and believe this junk, but in our hearts we are smart enough to know that the scientists have it right (or close anyway) and just because we don't understand every aspect of the «proof» behind it doesn't mean it is wrong.

Why should we expect investors to see America as a good place to put their money when so many of our people believe in this junk and actually speak out against our scientists?

Climatologists are always looking for good junk scientists to support their phony liberal Global Warming theory, and you're a liberal junk scientist of the first order.

You'll make a lot of money being the champion Global Warming Junk Scientist.

Australian scientists have discovered that group of immune cells, once considered junk, are actually a secret weapon the body uses to fight disease.

Australian scientists have discovered that group of immune cells, once considered junk, are actually a secret weapon the body uses to fight...

For example, calling those against vaccines «scientifically illiterate» — or, as CDC vaccine expert Stephen Cochi reportedly put it to one journalist, «junk scientists and charlatans» — may just lead to a further circling of the wagons.

Since the publication of the human genome sequence in 2001, scientists have found that the so - called junk DNA that lies between genes actually carries out many important functions.

Up to 98 percent of human genomic matter is known as «junk» or «dark matter» non-coding DNA, and had for years attracted little interest among scientists who doubted its role in human health and disease.

Boeke and others plan to grow this batch for thousands of generations over the next several years to see how they evolve over time, which will give scientists a better understanding of fundamental biology, from the role of «junk DNA» to the absolute minimum of genetic code necessary for survival.

Scientists have long debated how much of, or even if, the rest of our genome does anything, some going so far as to designate the part not devoted to encoding proteins as «junk DNA.»

It arises from what scientists previously described as â $ œjunk DNAâ $ or â $ œthe dark matter of the genome, â $ but this gene is definitely not junk.

7/12/2007 One Man's Junk May be a Genomic Treasure Scientists have only recently begun to speculate that what's referred to as «junk» DNA — the 96 percent of the human genome that doesn't encode for proteins and previously seemed to have no useful purpose — is present in the genome for an important Junk May be a Genomic Treasure Scientists have only recently begun to speculate that what's referred to as «junk» DNA — the 96 percent of the human genome that doesn't encode for proteins and previously seemed to have no useful purpose — is present in the genome for an important junk» DNA — the 96 percent of the human genome that doesn't encode for proteins and previously seemed to have no useful purpose — is present in the genome for an important r...

Singapore (OBBeC)- Scientists at the Genome Institute of Singapore (GIS) have reported that what was previously believed to be «junk» DNA is one of the important ingredients distinguishing humans from other species.

Junk food companies also employ scientists who are directed to publish scientific papers as part of the game.

The scientists took an unusual approach, essentially comparing the price of a calorie in a junk food to one consumed in a healthier meal.

Scientists estimate that 20 ~ 000 man - made objects are orbiting the Earth ~ much of the junk in low - Earth orbit.

Scientists in Great Britain are developing a giant harpoon which could grab some of the space junk and pull it down toward Earth where it can burn up.

Serious scientists skip that kind of junk because they can find better use for their time.

«I am disappointed that a scientist like Judy would repeat what smacks of junk science without even raising an eyebrow, and worse yet, proposing that a perfectly sound name be changed to «Tyndall effect» without bothering to check whether there is any substantive justification for this urban legend that originated with Wood's parody of a physics experiment.»

Milloy, who actually calls himself the «junk man» with no apparent sense of irony, is a denier - for - hire who happily takes money from tobacco interests, chemical interests and of course fossil fuel interests to do their dirty work, attacking seemingly any scientist whose findings threaten their financial bottom line.

«After 30 years of these «Chicken Little» alarmist scare stories independent scientists, specialists in a myriad of related disciplines, are speaking out about what they see is junk science.

That's the question being played out in a drama between Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli and the dead - end defenders of global warming's poster junk scientist, Michael Mann.

Scientists are as much victims of fashion as ordinary mortals are — a fact illustrated by the rich history of junk science and false alarms of the last 30 years.

The Air Vent All Models are Wrong Bart Verheggen Bernie Lewin Better Figures by Doug McNeall The Blackboard Bob Tisdale Cameron Rose Center for Energy and Environment, Competitive Enterprise Institute Center for Global Food Issues, Hudson Institute Center on Climate and Environmental Policy, The Heartland Institute Climate audit by Steve McIntyre The Climate Bet Climate Depot by Marc Morano Climate in Review, by C. Jeffery Small Climate Lessons Climate Policy, The Heritage Foundation Climate Resistance Climate Scientists» Register ClimateWiki Collide - a-Scape (Discover Magazine) Cooler Heads Digest Digging in the Clay by Verity Jones E-FACT Report by the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT) GlobalClimateScam.com Global Science Report GlobalWarming.org Global Warming, Cato Institute Green World Trust by Lucy Skywalker Gust of Hot Air by Jonathan Lowe Harmless Sky Haunting the Library ICECAP by Joseph D'Aleo International Climate Science Coalition International Conferences on Climate Change, The Heartland Institute Joe Bastardi JoNova, hosted by Joanne Nova Judy Curry Junk Science by Steve Milloy Master Resource Met Office Mike Hulme Nigel Calder Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change by Craig Idso et al..

Peden wrote, «' Real Climate» is a staged and contracted production, which wasn't created by «scientists,» it was actually created by Environmental Media Services, a company which specializes in spreading environmental junk science on behalf of numerous clients who stand to financially benefit from scare tactics through environmental fear mongering.»

What most definitely is scandalous is the vile hypocrisy of Soon's harrassment by the warmist establishment, which receives billions every year from the US government, left - wing charities, and billionaire activists like Tom Steyer and George Soros to prop up their bankrupt cause by promoting exactly the kind of junk science which Soon (and similarly principled scientists) have made it their business to shred.

All three of the above reasons should be critical to a scientist: without empirical verification, the theory is junk.

Bravo to the scientists on this site who are taking on the corporate apologist who themselves masquerade as debunkers of junk science in order to push their political and economic agendas.

They accuse real scientists of every charge that could be levelled at themselves: junk science, hidden funding, undisclosed interests and inflated credentials.

It is enough of a concern that scientists are even looking into nanotechnology for ways to deflect space junk.

Scientists have been calling out for clever ideas on how to clean up space junk for years now, and with President Obama's recent backing of getting the outskirts of our planet cleared of debris, more ideas seem to be pouring in.

All climate scientists junking the null hypothesis are piltdown man makers, the missing no longer link between real scientists and all conmen using language to obfuscate in support of vested interests, their own.

Of course, I am even more convinced today than I was (after reviewing IPCC SPM 2007) 3 years ago (especially after all the recent revelations of shenanigans and «junk science» by the scientists and bureaucrats involved with IPCC) a) that humans are not destroying our planet with CO2 emissions and b) that we do not have the ability to make changes in our climate by reducing these emissionOf course, I am even more convinced today than I was (after reviewing IPCC SPM 2007) 3 years ago (especially after all the recent revelations of shenanigans and «junk science» by the scientists and bureaucrats involved with IPCC) a) that humans are not destroying our planet with CO2 emissions and b) that we do not have the ability to make changes in our climate by reducing these emissionof shenanigans and «junk science» by the scientists and bureaucrats involved with IPCC) a) that humans are not destroying our planet with CO2 emissions and b) that we do not have the ability to make changes in our climate by reducing these emissions.