Sentences with phrase «of jurors reviewed»

Nearly 700 visual artists submitted work for consideration, and a national panel of jurors reviewed each application with the sole criterion of artistic excellence to determine the nine State Fellows.

A second national panel of jurors reviewed the State Fellows to determine the Southern Prize winner and finalist.

Nearly 700 visual artists submitted work for consideration, and a panel of jurors reviewed each application with the sole criterion of artistic excellence to determine the nine State Fellows.

Not exact matches

The government's final witness was FBI special agent Deanna Pennetta, a certified public accountant who prepared a number of spreadsheets and diagrams based on business records, phone calls and other documents related to Silver that the jurors will be able to review as evidence.

The jurors have heard 11 days of testimony from 20 witnesses over nearly four weeks — the trial was halted for Thanksgiving — during which they reviewed more than 700 exhibits, including dozens of secretly recorded telephone calls and conversations.

He lodged his objection to the jurors receiving a transcript of Spence's testimony, but Azrack said she would give it to them after prosecutors and defense attorneys review it.

After the government and defense reviewed those questionnaires, a number of prospective jurors were removed by agreement of the parties.

A design panel consisting of five highly respected world design experts was asked to first review each candidate, and then establish a short - list of recommendations for the jurors.

Being a digital juror usually means reviewing the facts of a case and giving your feedback to the attorneys involved.

After an initial review round by over 300 judges, the nearly 600 entries for the 2018 IGF Awards were distributed to a diverse set of expert jurors from across the industry for final consideration.

- Press: Artist Chris Smith Talking Shop, by ChicagoArts - MartinJon Garcia, Published on March 21, 2013 - Juror: Governors State University -2012 Illinois Community College Juried Exhibition, January 27 - March 2012 - Review: Chris D. Smith's «Unspoken Language», Review by Zachary Johnson on The Chicago Arts Archive - Sixty Inches From Center - Interview: Sitting Down With Chris Smith, Zachary Johnson, Sixty Inches From Center, Mar 31, 2011 - Lecturer for Paul Klein, KLEIN ARTIST WORKS at Linda Warren Gallery, November 22, 2010 - Lecturer for Loretta Bourque from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago at Linda Warren Gallery, 2009

Artists are selected through a review process with an outside panel of jurors.

In 2015 New American Paintings» jurors reviewed the work of more than 20,000 individual works of art by over 5000 artists.

The jurors will review all applications and select a group of finalists based on evidence of artistic merit and promise as shared in the application.

Help us narrow it down from 1000s of artists to one... In 2015 our jurors reviewed the work of more than 20,000 individual works of art by over 5000 artists.

Rather than convene a small panel to review hundreds of ideas, we use a system of crowd - sourcing wherein many jurors review a random subset of proposals with each proposal generally receiving more than 30 ratings.

The scribes were there during the entire juror review, helping the jurors morning and afternoon, rearranging work during the juror break, cleaning up and organizing things again at the end of the day.

A second panel of jurors is currently reviewing the State Fellows to determine the Southern Prize awardee and the Finalist.

Accepted artists are selected by a Review Committee and guest juror John Monti, Graduate Professor of Fine Arts at Pratt Institute.

Each application was reviewed by a panel of jurors comprising Erin Gilbert, independent curator from Chicago; Mark Scala, Curator at the Frist Center for the Visual Arts in Nashville; Lauren Haynes, Curator of Contemporary Art at Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art in Bentonville, Arkansas; Jan Davidson, retired director of the John C. Campbell School of Folk Arts in Brasstown, North Carolina; and Gia Hamilton, director of the Joan Mitchell Center in New Orleans.

Brett Abbott, High Museum Curator of Photography will review the works selected by the juror.

2005 Beth Venn, New American Paintings: Juried Exhibition - in - Print, number 58, p., 150 - 153, artist statement, photos of Hurricane Camille 1969, Impala, and Flood, review of work in Juror's Comments p. 3, photo of Impala on cover.

Grants and Awards 2015 Ox Bow Artist Residency, Saugatuck, MI 2014 Summer research, Welch School of Art and Design, GSU 2013 CENCIA Grant, College of Arts and Science, GSU Artist Residency, Vermont Studio Center, Johnson VT VSC Fellowship, Vermont Studio Center, Johnson VT Artist Residency, Atlantic Center for the Arts, New Smyrna Beach FL 2012 Artist Residency, Hambidge Art Center, Rabun Gap GA 2011 Summer Research Grant, Welch School of Art and Design, GSU 2008 Summer Research Grant, Welch School of Art and Design, GSU 2007 CENCIA Grant, College of Arts and Science, GSU 2006 Summer Research Grant, Welch School of Art and Design, GSU 2005 Research Initiation Grant, College of Arts and Science, GSU Juror Choice Award, Pass the Ammunition, Ninth Annual Arizona State University Art Museum Short Film and Video Festival, Tempe, AZ 2004 Summer Research Grant, Welch School of Art and Design, GSU 2003 Research Initiation Grant, College of Arts and Science, GSU Summer Research Grant, Welch School of Art and Design, GSU Juror Choice Award, Three Small Deaths, Seventh Annual Arizona State University Art Museum Short Film and Video Festival, Tempe, AZ 2002 Art In America 2001 in Review: Highlighted Public Art Projects «Brute Neighbors,» Commissioned by Hartsfield Atlanta International Airport Atlanta Urban Design Committee, Award of Excellence in Public Art 1998 The Atlanta Contemporary Art Center Studio Program 1997 Fulton County Arts Commission 1982 Ford Foundation III.

The exhibition on display at EFA presents a selection of several dozen of the most striking submissions as selected by two juror's reviews in 2008 and 2009 as well as more recent projects that have been uploaded to the site.

Juror Helen Frederick, who is an internationally known artist with a wealth of experience in the contemporary print world, carefully reviewed the images and information submitted by each artist and noted, «It was a joy to discover artists in many points of their careers submitting works with the inclusion of passionate statements regarding their thematic concepts.»

As a juror for this year's Turner prize, I read the reviews of the exhibition yesterday morning at Tate Britain with huge interest.

This year, our esteemed jurors Sean McFarland and Corey Keller will review all forms of photography ranging from traditional to experimental, including portraiture, landscape, street photography, documentary, conceptual, and beyond.

Mergel has been a guest lecturer, curator, and juror at cultural institutions in the United States, and, by invitation of international consulates, has reviewed contemporary art programming in France and Taiwan.

Five jurors, each with a wide knowledge of contemporary American art, nominate the artists and determine the award winner in a day of discussion and review.

All applicants will build their own gallery page through our website: epicepoch.org and all submitted images will be reviewed and critiqued by our awesome panel of jurors.

While courts do not acknowledge or encourage jury nullification, judges take «no steps... to prevent jurors from nullifying, jurors are not subject to legal sanction for nullifying, and verdicts that are the result of nullification are not subject to review» (Hreno, at para. 2)

And it doesn't matter whether the reviewing court rather than the trial court makes this finding.The crux of the decision lies in the fact that «the State failed to prove its case as a matter of law, not merely because [the judge], as a 13th juror, would have decided it differently from the other 12 jurors.»

Reports that sort by juror, party presenting, type of response, or chronologically can be saved for later review or emailed to others.

The American Bar Association in April of this year issued Ethics Opinion 466 stating that a lawyer may passively review a juror or potential juror's public presence on the Internet without violating Rule 3.5 (b) which prohibits ex parte communications with a juror.

In U.S. v. Lawson, on the other hand, the federal Fourth Circuit addressed at length the reliability concerns presented by reliance on Wikipedia.32 The issue arose when, despite the trial court's explicit instruction not to conduct research on the internet or otherwise, a juror reviewed, during deliberations, a Wikipedia definition of an element of the crime with which the defendant was charged.33 The juror no longer had the original Wikipedia entry but obtained a printout two weeks later in anticipation of his appearance before the court on complaints of juror misconduct.

Once a prospective juror has identified him / herself as wanting an accommodation, the jury office reviews the request and provides such reasonable accommodation as will satisfy the need of the individual.

However, a discussion of capital voir dire must begin with a review of the general communication and comprehension gaps between jurors and legal professionals.