Sentences with phrase «of jury research»

Not exact matches

Though the jury is still out as to whether managers can increase employee entitlement (I think it can), some research hints that playing into the behavior of entitled people makes the problem much worse.

Corelogic's head of research Tim Lawless said the jury was still out on whether the housing market had peaked given previous strong rebounds in 2015 and 2016 following dips.

In terms of finding alpha, the jury is out, said Louis Scott, founder of Kiema Advisors, who was presenting joint research with Northfield Information Services.

Quite apart from indications born of biblical faith, it is impossible to imagine a society in which no research of any kind could be done until the researcher had demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt to a judge or a jury or a committee that it should be done.

Prosecutors hope Taub, one of their star witnesses, will prove to the jury that Silver pushed him to refer mesothelioma patients to Weitz & Luxenberg, the firm where Silver was of counsel and from where he collected portions of settlements while allegedly funneling state health care funds to Taub's research center at Columbia University.

This week we unveiled a little bit of research of our own, having enlisted the help of a jury to try and find out who is parliament's most Liberated MP.

This words came from the jury of a scientific poster competition, at a meeting of my research consortia.

These posters are unattractive» This words came from the jury of a scientific poster competition, at a meeting of my research consortia.

Whatever the nuances of the current research, the job of the experts brought into a case by prosecutors and defense attorneys «is to make the judge or the jury believe that their version of the science is true and correct and should win the case,» Rothstein said.

Research led by Sophieke Russell at the University of Kent in Canterbury, UK, holds important lessons about how juries arrive at decisions of guilt and sentencing — and possible pointers for achieving genuine justice in courts.

The lawyers expect that the photographs will help to turn the jury against the defendant, and a growing body of research supports this view.

Whatever the rights and wrongs of this argument, and more considered research is needed before the jury can bring in a verdict, this volume is essential reading for all space enthusiasts and historians.

An expert jury says that the company's research could lead to a new generation of vaccines that don't need refrigeration — a massive benefit in many poor countries where power and equipment are in short supply.

But Emma Whitelaw of the Queensland Institute of Medical Research in Brisbane, Australia, cautions that the jury is still out on whether endocrine - disrupters are acting through epigenetic mechanisms.

While other research groups are also working on this problem, the advantages of the NIST approach include a low error rate in initial tests and that it is relatively easy to explain to a jury.

But a growing body of opinion now challenges these claims, and in the absence of definitive research — or indeed, much research at all — the jury is still out on oxyfuels.

The CNRS then publishes the names of the candidates who were preselected, and these candidates present their research plans individually to a jury for about 10 minutes in a system called concours.

On the evidence of her track record, her research proposal's quality, and her ambition, Aifantis's jury saw her as having «a very high potential to become an independent research leader in spite of her limited experience,» according to the ERC evaluation report.

The Artery jury, which met in Maastricht from October 9 to 11, awarded the research, titled «Elevated arterial stiffness precedes development of hypertension in never treated prehypertensive patients» the second price.

IRB Barcelona has named Joan Font - Burgada (Caldes de Montbui, Barcelona, 1977) winner of the 2018 IRB Barcelona Alumni of Excellence Award «for his important contributions to understand the development of cancer, in particular, why cancers evolve with mutations that are poorly immunogenic, and also for the identification of special hepatic reparative cells with low propensity to produce cancer,» states the report by the jury — a body formed by senior IRB Barcelona researchers with expertise across several fields of research.

Dr. Goldstein is also Chairman of the Albert Lasker Medical Research Awards Jury.

The 2015 mid-term evaluation report of LABEX IAST resulted in a very positive assessment by the international jury: «This is a high - risk, high - potential project that can lead to transformative research in the long term, Intersection between economics, biology, psychology, and other fields, perfectly suited for funding by a public research agency.

Dr. Goldstein is currently Chairman of the Albert Lasker Medical Research Awards Jury and is a member of the Boards of Trustees of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and The Rockefeller University.

Front Row, left to right: J. Michael Bishop, University of California School of Medicine ● Mary Ellen Avery, Harvard Medical School ● Paul Nurse, Imperial Cancer Research Fund ● Michael DeBakey, Chair Emeritus of the Jury, Baylor College of Medicine ● Joseph Goldstein, Chair of the Jury, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center ● Michael Brown, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center ● Stuart Orkin, Harvard Medical School ● Owen Witte, University of California, Los Angeles

The bottom line for consumers is that the «jury is still out,» says Catherine Ulbricht, PharmD, co-founder of Natural Standard Research Collaboration, which collects data on complementary and alternative medicine, and chief editor of the Journal of Dietary Supplements.

As for the research on competitive effects of school choice policies in general — vouchers, tax - credit scholarships, and charters all together — the jury is still out, said David Arsen, a professor of education policy and K - 12 educational administration at Michigan State University.

The Jury and Nominators have also selected 15 art writers from six countries, continuing the commitment of ABSOLUT to supporting research into art writing and to developing critical theory.

The jury highlighted the breadth of his artistic research, especially with regard to the lingering effects of colonialism, his encyclopedic elaboration of the notion of «repair,» and his passionate engagement with current affairs.

2017 [Collective] BASH, Farnsworth Art Museum at 449 Main St., Rockland, Maine 2016 Belfast Poetry Festival, Barbara Kramer Gallery, Belfast, Maine From A to B (solo exhibition), Perimeter Gallery, Belfast, Maine Cranbrook + / -25 years (traveling group exhibition)- 2016 NCECA 50th Annual Conference, Kansas City, Missouri - University Art Gallery, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico - Ceramic Research and Brickyard Gallery, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona Winter Windows, fourTWELVE, Rockland, Maine 2015 Panels, Perimeter Gallery, Belfast, Maine 2014 Vessels, The Qube, Detroit, Michigan Small Favors IX, The Clay Studio, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 2014 Graduate Degree Exhibition, Cranbrook Art Museum, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 2013 The Balance, Forum Gallery, Cranbrook Academy of Art, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan Art Y ’ All, Nasher Sculpture Center, Dallas, Texas A New Interior, Forum Gallery, Cranbrook Academy of Art, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan Experiencing Perspectives 2013 - 14, Mercedes Benz Financial Services, Farmington Hills, Michigan CERAMICA: Contemporary Clay, Galleries of Contemporary Art, UCCS, Colorado Springs, Colorado 2011 1:1, Ice Cube Gallery, Denver, Colorado HIVE, Galleries of Contemporary Art, UCCS, Colorado Springs, Colorado 2010 2010 Visions In Clay, National Juried Exhibition, LH Horton Jr..

2005 Native American Fine Arts Show, Mashantucket Pequot Museum & Research Center, juried group exhibit, Machantucket, USA New Works By Christi Belcourt, Metis Nation of Ontario Annual General Assembly, solo exhibit, Sudbury, ON

A jury of experts has chosen twelve innovators to exhibit their research outcomes in the Qidian exhibition this fall at Zendai Zhujiajiao Art Space and Water Heavens, the studio of China's internationally renowned musician, Tan Dun.

This juried exhibition features works that examine the idea of digging, exploration, research and analysis, investigation, or excavation.

The jury also highlighted the breadth of his artistic research, especially with regard to the lingering effects of colonialism, as well as his encyclopedic, yet nuanced elaboration of the notion of repair.

The judging jury particularly praised the research agency for its ability to develop «highly innovative methods for sourcing and visualising evidence relating to human rights abuses around the world, used in courts of law as well as exhibitions of art and architecture,» explains Tate.

The members of the Annual Award 2014 jury are: Paul Bonaventura (Senior Research Fellow in Fine Art Studies, University of Oxford), Helen Legg (Director, Spike Island, Bristol), Tom Morton (Writer, Curator and contributing Editor, Frieze) and Eva Rothschild (Artist).

Micro Spark award from the Sprout Fund 2012, National Science Foundation Visualization Challenge 2011 (Finalist); Annual Juried Show, 2nd Place, ModernFormations Gallery, 2006; Tuition Remission towards a Fifth Year of Study 2004 - 05; Small Undergraduate Research Award, 2005; Phi Kappa Phi Honor Society; Outstanding Academic Achievement

Bob Ward, policy and communications director at the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Changement said: «Some commentators have already taken on the role of judge and jury, pronouncing on the guilt of those involved and calling for their resignations.

The jury applauds this exceptional structure that exhibits one of the unique contributions made to design and construction research in Canada and beyond.

Posts offer research - based persuasion strategies that lawyers can use in both the pretrial and trial phases of litigation in jury, bench or arbitration settings.

Until recently, attorneys who wanted to conduct jury research had the sole option of assembling and presenting a costly and time - consuming «mock trial.»

While jury research will never be instantaneous, DecisionQuest's products come as close to that as possible, with online mock jury and jury questionnaire results available at previously unheard of turnaround times.

In Palm Beach, courts now warn jurors against using social media or doing any of their own Internet research before or after they are selected, before they begin deliberations, and each time the jury takes a break.

With regard to jury research, generally fees are charged on a 1/2 day basis and can vary significantly depending upon factors such as: venue, size of the jury pool, the number of mock trials required, and the type of research facility and technology to be utilized.

Research also suggests that plaintiffs» damage requests influence juries» assessments of appropriate awards.

As reported in The Recorder, the proposed rule was prompted by a jury - selection episode in June, when an entire panel of 600 jurors had to be excused after it was discovered that several had conducted their own online research into the case.

«For many years, judges have been warning juries against viewing the evidence through the lens of «stereotypes», however this research suggests these directions are not having the desired effect.»

However, this research shows that for all the best efforts of the courts, juries are not necessarily offering a fair and impartial assessment of the evidence, particularly within rape cases.»

Nigel Booth said: «This research asks some very serious and difficult questions about the fairness of jury trials in rape cases.

«Today we announce no hard and fast rule that all such types of internet research by a juror prior to trial without notice to the court and counsel automatically doom a jury's verdict.

That means taking steps that include showing emojis in relevant opinions, making emojis and emoticons searchable in legal research engines such as Nexis and Westlaw, and letting juries review them as part of trial evidence.