Shanti Grumbine literally and laboriously excises the content from the New York Times, evolving the work through the process
of kenosis.
Of course, Altizer's conception
of the kenosis necessarily excludes a transcendent being who continues in existence after the coming of the Lord.
I was convinced that Altizer's doctrine
of kenosis was both accurate and inevitable.
The tides
of kenosis and love.
This, as you know, is all part
of the Kenosis doctrine, that Jesus chose to set aside the independent use of some of his attributes in order to fulfill His mission, to become fully man.
Certainly the great Christological Councils do not present the kind
of kenosis Altizer says the Christian must believe.
Therefore, in Christ's life and death the Christian must believe that transcendence was fully transformed into immanence and finally died to itself.5 It is not at all clear why the Christian must accept so literal an interpretation
of the kenosis doctrine.
Open theism argues that God does not know «the future», either because it does not yet exist to be known, or because God chooses not to know it, in an act
of kenosis (self - emptying).
Only the acceptance of the mission of the Suffering Servant, i.e., mission in Christ's way, and a theology
of kenosis or self emptying, will enable us to cross a frontier.
If you want to bring a misty - eyed contemplative smile to a Christian from the Orthodox Church, mention the theology
of kenosis — Christ «emptying» himself.
Experience itself, therefore, is only truly consummated in the passion of generation where the spontaneous expression of bodily energy duplicates and even makes incarnate in each individual body the universal process
of the kenosis or emptying of the Godhead.
Altizer betrays his assumption of a metaphysics when he states, «Hegel's central idea
of kenosis, or the universal and dialectical process of the self - negation of being, provided me with a conceptual route to a consistently kenotic or self - emptying understanding of the Incarnation, an understanding which I believe has been given a full visionary expression in the work of William Blake.»
I think I probably hold a more Eastern Orthodox view
of Kenosis according to Wikipedia.
Theodore Runyon claims that Altizer's exegesis
of the kenosis hymn is invalid and shows an ignorance of Paul's doctrine of God.15
Or else the notion
of kenosis can become so spiritualized that actual suffering bodies are unattended to.
Not exact matches
Humility is a distinctively Christian virtue, grounded in the doctrine
of Christ's
kenosis.
The bible itself testifies to the self - emptying
of God, the «
kenosis», the sacrifice
of his own transcendence (read Philippians 2).
Divine
kenosis, she insists, does not mean that divine power is sacrificed but rather that it is relocated in a «relational love» that brings about forgiveness and awakens an ethic
of care and compassion for others.
Is it possible that the
kenosis is so total, paradigmatic... that Jesus, let's say, from our Christian perspective, is the lens through which we understand the
kenosis... a kind
of historical, momentous «freezing»
of the a-historical?
It is in the
kenosis, the self - emptying,
of the Son that the Father effects salvation in the power
of the Spirit.
His attempt to build a radical doctrine
of Incarnation on the
kenosis hymn in Phil.
The special logic
of this theory, after all, is that the Christian philosopher — having surmounted the «aesthetic,» «ethical,» and even in a sense «religious» stages
of human existence — is uniquely able to enact a return, back to the things
of earth, back to finitude, back to the aesthetic; having found the highest rationality
of being in God's
kenosis — His self - outpouring — in the Incarnation, the Christian philosopher is reconciled to the particularity
of flesh and form, recognizes all
of creation as a purely gratuitous gift
of a God
of infinite love, and is able to rejoice in the levity
of a world created and redeemed purely out
of God's «pleasure.»
Perhaps it is only in the eschaton, when the
kenosis of the Father has come to an end and God is all in all, that God will show his justice in permitting the suffering
of the world, in allowing the cries in Rama, and in every corner and breast
of this world where Rachel's cry is perpetually heard.
But the
kenosis doctrine reminds us that although Jesus was God, he really did empty himself
of his omnipotence and omniscience.
In other words, the result
of the «incarnation»
of omega in alpha is a descent or
kenosis, a concealment and an absence from the future, such that the very proof
of the presence
of omega in alpha is precisely its absence.
Such is the
kenosis of the Father's love.»
For Hamann, by contrast, the
kenosis of God illuminates and transfigures everything, grace transfuses all
of nature, culture, and cult, and so his humor has a wealth, an overwhelming hilarity, and a truly Christian mirthfulness that Kierkegaard's does not.
God empties (
kenosis) Godself
of privilege, advantage and power over creation and becomes available, accessible, answerable and liable for the conditions
of sin.
That insight had such significance for John Paul that he would return to it fourteen years later in Fides et Ratio, writing that the chief purpose
of theology «is seen to be the understanding
of God's
kenosis, a grand and mysterious truth for the human mind, which finds it inconceivable that suffering and death can express a love which gives itself and seeks nothing in return.»
Kenosis Try Lord Raglan's The Hero, A Study in Tradition, Myth and Drama In it he outlined 22 common traits
of god - heroes.
To explain how, he turned to the second chapter
of Paul's Letter to the Philippians where the apostle speaks
of the self - emptying or
kenosis of God: «Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form
of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, taking the form
of a servant... [and] humbled himself and became obedient unto death, even death on a cross.»
But before we can fully understand Altizer's call for the death sentence upon all sacred entities in general, and God in particular, we must add Altizer's emphasis upon
kenosis, the Self - emptying
of God into historical being.
Introduction — «The Messiness
of Real Life»: «At the end
of one cycle
of time, they say, we experience
kenosis, an emptying.
In «
Kenosis and Subversion: On the Repression
of «Vulnerability» in Christian Feminist Writing,» she argues that the «paradox
of power and vulnerability» is best exemplified by «this act
of silent waiting on the divine in prayer....
The conviction
of a divine
kenosis could scarcely have entered our consciousness apart from this event.
One word is deeply revealing here, and that is the Pauline word
kenosis (Philippians 2:5 - 8), a word which Hegel explicitly employs in many
of the most crucial and difficult passages
of the Phenomenology, and that calls forth the theological meaning
of Aufhebung as a divine and ultimate self - emptying or self - negation.
This is the
kenosis which fully and openly occurs in the Crucifixion, but which Christian orthodoxy from its very beginning had affirmed to occur only in the humanity and not in the divinity
of Christ, an orthodoxy reversed by Luther, and if only here Hegel was a deeply Lutheran Christian.
The
kenosis of the pre-existent Son (Phil.
But if Jesus is the sacrament
of God's own reality, as Christian faith teaches, we must conclude once again that the essential content
of revelation is nothing other than the
kenosis of God that opens up the future to an all - inclusive vision promised in the resurrection.
We should emphasize, though, that the self -
kenosis of God is not a negative occurrence in the Godhead but a positive movement whose purpose is that
of bringing about relationship to God's other.
Panikkar does not want to strengthen the rather distrustful attitude
of many Hindus towards «the West» and Christianity but rather seeks to pursue dialogue through «unilateral disarmament», as it were, through unilateral
kenosis.
The audacity
of this belief in the divine
kenosis has often been lost by long familiarity with it.
When taken together with the biblical motif
of promise, the notion
of a divine
kenosis may provide for our own situation today a solid and compelling foundation for a fresh theology
of revelation.
Informed by contemporary experience
of the apparent eclipse
of mystery, by the sorrow and oppression in much social existence, by the horrors
of genocide, and by the modern threat
of meaninglessness to the individual's existence, we now seem to be noticing more explicitly than ever before the image
of God's self - emptying, or
kenosis, that has always been present in Christian tradition.
But even they show that the contrary is the case, as Altizer himself demonstrates when he claims that he is talking about the absolute immanence or «presence - in - this - world»
of the Word or Spirit, in consequence
of the radical
kenosis or self - emptying
of the transcendent deity usually denoted by the word «God».
When Paul spoke
of the «folly»
of the Gospel and counter-posed it to the «wisdom
of the world,» he was pointing to what we might call a cognitive aspect
of God's
kenosis,
of God's abasement.
It is that crucial motif in Christianity that theologians have called the
kenosis, the humiliation
of God: The same God who has all power, who created this world and all possible worlds, has taken upon himself the form and the fate
of an ordinary man, and indeed a man who suffered the most agonizing afflictions
of betrayal, torture, despair, and death.
Barfield's conception
of the incarnation as a freeing
of man, in the course
of time, to say the Divine Name («I am...») here coalesces with Altizer's idea that the death
of God frees us to see the contemporary reality
of a continuing incarnational
kenosis leading to a nonhubristic apotheosis
of man.15 Barfield has achieved with his metaphorical sensitivity a pre-view
of a «final participation» which is the coincidentia oppositorum Altizer was insufficiently able to apprehend with his dialectical method.
«At the end
of one cycle
of time, they say, we experience
kenosis, an emptying.
Kenosis becomes a matter
of God's self - abnegation
of a mode
of power that God wills not to utilize.