If we had not petitioned the court for a judicial review of the adjudicator's decision, our client would be stuck with a knowing that one
of our key arguments had not even been taken into consideration
Just to head off a possible debate about water vapor, that is one
of the key arguments.
For those of you without a subscription, however, I've highlighted
some of his key arguments below, along with my responses to those I felt were most pertinent here.
One
of the key arguments for this is its ability to foster an entrepreneurial mindset.
They cover evaluations
of the key arguments, looking at the assessment that happens in the exam, model paragraphs for students to work from and a checklist of understanding.
This lesson gives an introduction to what euthanasia is, the law and
some of the key arguments for and against it.
It's also being used as one
of the key arguments for the paleo community.
One
of the key arguments is that fasting acts as a mild form of stress on our bodies.
One
of the key arguments in the case for fracking rests on an appeal to common sense.
That is because one
of the key arguments no longer looks as strong as it did... that it was necessary to avoid a Greek - style sovereign debt crisis.»
Here are five
of the key arguments employed by those seeking to bring him down.
Otherwise it'll get left behind, which is one
of the key arguments in your book.
The Remain campaign has made the undefined destination of Brexit one
of its key arguments.
One
of the key arguments used in opposition to cryptocurrency is the lack of real - world value.
The resurgence in U.S. oil demand is showing signs of flagging, with drivers easing off the gas pedal a bit in August, according to U.S. data on Friday that may weaken one
of the key arguments for bullish oil traders.
He dismissed many
of the key arguments that DraftKings and FanDuel have used to support the idea that their games are not illegal gambling.
Not exact matches
In conjunction with watching Star Trek, we will read excerpts from the writings
of great philosophers, extract
key concepts and
arguments and then analyze those
arguments.»
That raises doubts about a
key argument for proponents
of federal immigration reform: that companies need looser rules to import overseas workers because there aren't enough job candidates in the United States who can fill specialized skills, namely in science, technology and engineering.
The
key to making this
argument isn't any kind
of investigation into the Trump Foundation, it's the basics
of Trump's business ownership.
Although the Chief Justice acknowledged that this
argument had some merit, the more determinative factor — and the
key difference between the statutory immunity provisions relied upon by the ERCB and Alberta Environment — was that the immunity clause with respect to the former explicitly contemplated the regulator as an entity («the Board or a member
of the Board...») whereas the immunity provisions under the Water Act and the EPEA did not (referring only to «persons» in various capacities; see paras 62 — 71).
The
key thrust
of Jarret's
arguments in various articles on this topic seem to be «people who have much more experience in this than Musk have already proved this doesn't work.»
The
key argument of leading «salt water» Keynesian economists like Paul Krugman, Joe Stiglitz and Larry Summers is that governments can and should drive faster growth through deficit financed public infrastructure investment, which would boost short - term growth and also raise productivity and longer term growth prospects.
A cornerstone
of Lakshman Achuthan's
argument is that four
key indicators used by the NBER to make official recession calls are, as he put it, «rolling over.»
Late on Saturday afternoon, House Democrats surprised the country by releasing their rebuttal to the so - called Nunes memo — the document, prepared by Rep. Devin Nunes (R - CA), that has become a
key part
of the conservative
argument that the FBI is biased against President Donald Trump.
A
key part
of Trump's
argument during the 2016 campaign was that he was an excellent manager, someone who would hire «the best people» and use his business acumen to fix Washington.
I do know that even people as insightful as Wolfson do not get, or are not persuaded by,
key aspects
of the
argument.
A
key part
of Murray's
argument is the claim that, for people with no special skills, the enabling conditions for the pursuit
of happiness must be created within and through their immediate geographic neighborhood.
In the same letter he argues that Catholicism will be the only lasting form
of Christianity; this
argument also appears in Democracy, as Peter mentions, but without mention
of the letter's
key point that Protestantism is a half - way house between «reason» and «authority» that can not maintain its contradictory position over the long run, and which thus must lose its adherents to these two poles.
Dawkins» view
of the Bible either betrays a remarkable ignorance
of the
key principles
of biblical criticism or, worse, an intentional disregard
of those principles in order to sell his
argument.
The
key to its success has been the feminist recognition that, while any set
of outside motives can be brought to a discipline, it can only persuade by following the canons
of logic, evidence and
argument that obtain within the discipline.
They need to bring their conclusions before the community, lay their
arguments bare and clear, and enable the community to see how their thinking matches with the «traditional» and the
key ongoing components
of the faith.
A
key component in Grobstein's
argument is deserving
of most particular attention.
I now turn to a short sketch
of what I take to be Hartshorne's most important
arguments against the classical attributes in Group I. Let us begin with absoluteness (in the sense
of lack
of internal relatedness), which is the
key to the whole thing.
«39 Since few people read Lowe's entire 1949 article in which the details
of his
argument are really presented, I will select a few
of the
key contrasts Lowe reprinted in Understanding Whitehead, which contains an abridgement
of the 1949 article, in an effort to show that Gunter has really answered them already rendering Whitehead not so much Bergson's mathematical alter ego, 40 as something more approaching his philosophical blood brother 41 According to Lowe, however, «it is fatal to the understanding
of Whitehead's constructive metaphysical effort to define it in Bergsonian terms.
I continue to be troubled by the structure
of David Jones»
argument regarding the ethics
of cremation.Let's review his conclusion: After reviewing some
of the
key historical, biblical, and theological considerations that have been a part
of the moral discussion
of cremation within the....
This same work
of Cicero's is cited by Augustine in book two
of the City
of God for its definition
of a commonwealth, and again at a
key point in the
argument in book nineteen.
Christ the
Key is less a single, overarching
argument than a series
of closely connected studies
of how a particular understanding
of Christ reshapes various theological topics.
According to logician Trudy Govier, «The fallacy
of equivocation is committed when a
key word in an
argument is used in two or more senses and the premises
of the
argument appear to support its conclusion only because these senses are not distinguished from each other.»
Key to that
argument is the important distinction between what is moral and what is legal (an important distinction indeed), and the need for a «consensus» in order to move toward the greater legal protection
of unborn children.
Just as the Anglican Lambeth Conference
of 1930 undermined a
key part
of the conceptual framework that made potentially fruitful heterosexual intercourse the only acceptable kind
of sex, so the gradual degradation in the popular understanding
of marriage makes it very difficult for many people to conceptualise the Catholic
argument against gay marriage.
The coherence
of the
argument (not a closed one, like a system
of logic, but open, like a method or
key to progressive research) is such that I believe only solid, positive reasons can lead to its rejection; and for my part I can see none that is adequate.
And the
argument is not much
of a refutation, if a
key premise is admittedly up for grabs!
The
key to Doyle's
argument lies in the Thomistic emphasis upon the dynamic nature
of hope in relation to faith and charity: «faith hope, and charity constitute, respectively, the potency, motion, and act
of Christian humanism» (p101).
Versions
of the
argument, with
key twists and turns, have been introduced in Western philosophy through the centuries by thinkers from Descartes and Leibniz down to the twentieth - century American philosopher Charles Hartshorne.
Indeed, something akin to Hamburger's own
argument, directed explicitly to contemporary church - state issues, has appeared in the pages
of this magazine (Michael McConnell, «Why «Separation» Is Not the
Key to Church - State Relations,» CHRISTIAN CENTURY, January 18, 1989).
The
key argument for prop * o * nents
of this act is that a woman has a right to her own body.
But whether one affirms or questions the appropriateness
of separation as a metaphor; whether one looks to the original intent
of our constitutional authors and their allies or views the law as an evolving entity; whether one points to establishment or free exercise as the
key to American religious liberty, Hamburger's Separation
of Church and State is a book destined to ensure that the
argument continues.
According to Radner, the book's
argument is flawed because it adopts the modern notion that «one's ideas form the basis
of religious identity and integrity» and touts the rectification
of bad ideas as the
key to alleviating contemporary problems.
One
key point
of contention between the ACCC's view three years ago and Murray Goulburn's
argument is whether the market for raw milk is defined as localised, or given a broader inter-state definition.
A
key point in the NFL's
argument was that Rice had said he «slapped» Palmer instead
of «hit.»