In a strong case for the Prosecution, a good lawyer, who does his investigation and preparation properly, and has the right experience, can find the weaknesses in the evidence and testimony
of key prosecution witnesses.
Not exact matches
A defense lawyer in the Joseph Percoco corruption trial accused the main
witness, Todd Howe,
of making up a
key detail regarding a dinner meeting to bolster the
prosecution's theory
of a bribery scheme.
Defense lawyers for ex-top Cuomo administration aide Joseph Percoco want the attorney for
key prosecution witness Todd Howe kept out
of Percoco's corruption trial until his client testifies.
Defense attorneys for former Nassau County Executive Ed Mangano are attacking the credibility
of the
prosecution's
key witness in his corruption case.
People had expected prompt
prosecution and incarceration
of offenders, to deter others, but what we
witnessed was a situation where some
key officials
of this administration were involved in unwholesome acts, capable
of tarnishing the image
of government.
Bohrer laid into Todd Howe, the lobbyist and longtime associate
of both Percoco and Cuomo who is expected to serve as a
key witness for the
prosecution.
Harendra Singh, a de Blasio donor, is the
key witness for the
prosecution in the corruption trial
of Nassau County Executive Edward Mangano.
Briscoe was dropped as a
key prosecution witness in the trial
of former cabinet minister and Liberal Democrat MP Chris Huhne and his ex-wife, economist Vicky Pryce.
He's the
key prosecution witness in the trial underway at the International Court
of Justice
of Vladislav Dukhovich (Gary Oldman), an Eastern European dictator accused
of committing genocide.
Adler is also a critic
of the work
of Thomas Kane, another person
of interest (see prior posts about Kane here and here), as Kane is also involved with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, he is a proponent
of VAMs as aligned with the Gates Foundation's interests, and he (like Chetty) served as a
key witness for the
prosecution in the same Vergara v. California trial.
(correct test for Barrister appeals; whether outside the ex improviso rule, prosecutor may call evidence after
prosecution and defence case closed; use
of debarring orders against prosecutor; whether tribunal may «enter the arena» and strongly request the attendance
of a
prosecution witness; whether BSB has power to summons
witnesses; whether prosecutor may communicate with disciplinary judge behind the back
of the defence; whether such communication redolent
of actual bias
of judge where judge wishes prosecutor good luck on appeal; whether apparent bias doctrine can be engaged by post-trial conduct
of judge; legal effect
of serving BSB
prosecutions department officer being 1
of 4 appointing members
of the COIC «Tribunals Appointments Body» (TAB); whether TAB ultra vires the Bar's Constitutions; whether open - ended power
of removal
of member
of COIC pool without cause, unlawful given position
of BSB Chair and senior staff on COIC; whether ECHR Article 6 guarantees against pressure on disciplinary judges to conform with a prosecutorial mentality; whether disciplinary judges Art. 6 «independent» within Findlay v United Kingdom given
key role
of BSB
prosecutions department in appointing disciplinary judges; serious non-disclosure by BSB
of notes
of secret meeting between BSB and disciplinary judge until day before appeal and despite requests and application for disclosure by defence)