Sentences with phrase «of labelling things»

But unfortunately, the practice of labeling things as simply good or bad can create more problems than solutions for our young kids, failing to do the very thing we want it to do, namely, to help our kids learn to manage themselves and follow the golden rule.

«What he is doing is that, this woman is doing so well and I was a disaster as an attorney general so let me attempt to discredit her and that is why he will go to the extent of labeling things against her that are not true.

I own THREE label makers and numerous other means of labeling things.

Not exact matches

Instead of judging or labeling others, you work hard to see things through their eyes.

One of the main things the #MeToo movement has proven is that many victims are afraid to speak up — out of fear of losing their jobs, becoming labeled or ostracized, or sharing a horrible thing that's happened to them with others.

«Anything that provides users with more information is a good thing,» Jillian York, EFF's director for international freedom of expression, tells Inc. of Facebook's move to label stories as disputed and link to a corresponding article explaining why.

Though critics over the years have labeled him any number of things — anarchist, socialist, even Marxist — make no mistake, Mackey is a true believer in (mostly unfettered) free enterprise, and his love for it is like that of a convert who finds salvation later in life.

[I] f I had kept all these things neatly sorted and filed and labeled, it would save me a lot of trouble.

«The amazing thing about that is that the glasses they featured in that episode are by Joseph Marc, one of our private label brands,» Magness says.

Limited - edition collections and collaborations with prestige labels like Marc Jacobs and Drake's OVO do a good job of keeping things fresh.

Being part of a team and working as a team are two completely different things — and oftentimes leaders can be too quick to label groups as teams, thinking that by calling a group a team, teamwork will ensue.

In recent years, some things have been labeled the «Next Lehman,» like China's potential economic slowdown, a bankruptcy of Greece or high U.S. government debt levels.

I am so sorry that you have been told / taught such awful things about Jesus, but whether or not you believe He is fully man and also fully God, there is more than enough proof historically and in present scripture to show that labeling Him as a mysogonist and an advocate for murder is a drastically false account of who He is and what He stood for.

Of course lots of people do things I would label as love, but it is just a label for things I like and want to happeOf course lots of people do things I would label as love, but it is just a label for things I like and want to happeof people do things I would label as love, but it is just a label for things I like and want to happen.

Jesus defied labels because His way of doing things transcended them.

If such a thing existed, «righteous» or «unrighteous,» then the corrext labeling process would explore the morality of the actions between differing social groups.

Thus, we have «positive and negative» as arbitrary but handy labels to show the dynamic opposition between the two according to the topological dynamics and interactive properties — yet the two poles are part of the same thing, just as with the poles of the Earth.

We're are saying that He didn't see things through the lens of political or economic labels.

@Matt, ``... I think they do things with that LABEL of disbelief but are actually acting out on a BELIEF that religion is bad, dangerous, and wrong.

I know that I see elements of divine around me in things and in ways that others don't, including other religious people... And as long as different religions and even sects constantly argue about what god truly is, and as long as they come up with different asnwers, then I have to say that the spiritual elements of our universe simply manifest differently for different folks, including not at all for some... as with those who label themselves as athiest...

I could like things that Joe wrote, and I could represent Joe if Joe just died and write and label my writing to be in the spirit of Joe.

Positron, all of your posts have dealt with what was done in the past, yet when I do the same thing, you label me a «devout pessimist»?

Of course we need labels for things.

You don» have to pile labels on me for pointing out the obvious, but perhaps this is one of the things that lately have become unmentionable.

It's pretty ridiculous how quick some are to label a person or group a heretic over some of the most petty things.

When I claim that label, I'm connecting not only with a number of active feminists who are working today to help women, but with an ongoing history of feminists who got women the vote, who made birth control happen, who got women into positions of power in the government, who worked to rectify racial inequality and fight against things like mandatory sterilization of welfare recipients.

-- they claim to be disciples of Jesus but it is really just a comforting label for the nice things they want to do just like Atheists do.

It is why many in the g ay community have done a disservice to themselves, in my opinion, by labeling christians as ho m phobes and big ots when many of us are the furthest thing from that.

However, as we get older, that labeling process becomes somehow, corrupted — leading to all sorts of bad things, bad thinking and false truths.

The most important thing behind what ever label we give to those who lead among us is that it's helpful to those who are joining our communities, who don't yet have a depth of relationship to defer to leadership.

Only I - Thou sees this wholeness as the whole person in unreasoned relation with what is over against him rather than as a sum of parts, some of which are labeled objective and hence oriented around the thing known and some subjective and hence oriented around the knower.

I think given equal opportunities there will be a natural inclination for many towards traditional roles and that this is healthy, has nothing to do with any artificial social construct but is natural and comes out of biology and now might be the time to be having open discussions about this kind of thing without having to face the fear of being labelled misogynistic for doing so or with feeling fearful of any threat to equality.

What I meant was that people who label everything good and bad, tend to avoid «bad» things like anger and sadness and fear so that instead of dealing with those emotions, they just pretend they aren't there — even though they still are.

Although the whole Bible is revelational and thus inerrant in fulfilling its intention (something Fuller repeatedly affirms in spite of criticism by some like Lindsell), 45 those things in Scripture which are incidentally related to the completion of this revelational intention can be labeled «non-revelatory» matters.

Further, all of those labels could mean different things to us today than they meant to him back then.

it gives me the strength to withstand the demanding and ever constant pressure of the label noise (what does it mean to be this and how can i be multiple things simultaneously) and other noise of modernity that can assault the searching spirit.

Regardless of labels, I believe that the creating and redeeming God has greater things yet in store for the fulfillment of his purposes upon this planet.

Fazlur Rahman, who is sometimes labeled a Muslim modernist, insists that «The Muslim modernists say exactly the same thing as the so - called Muslim fundamentalists say: that Muslims must go back to the original and definitive sources of Islam and perform ijithad (independent judgment) on that basis.»

When a label is required I've referred to myself as a Christian, as a believer, as Torah - observant, as a follower of the Way - as Rabbi Shaul / Paul says, becoming all things to all people.

Mr. Nuechterlein's rhetoric, labeling orthodox critics of Benke as «ultraconservatives» with a «sectarian mentality» and a «blinkered preoccupation with unionism,» sounded much more like the kind of orthodoxy - bashing one has come to expect from the mainstream media than the thoughtful commentary typical of First Things in general and Mr. Nuechterlein's work in particular.

While I'm no fan of labels --(and «emerging» or «emergent» can mean a lot of different things to a lot of different people)-- it would be dishonest for me to say that I have not been influenced by many of the writers and speakers that are associated with this movement.

When a person exhibits too much passion over anything — God, a political movement, the latest in tattoos or a popular television show — we label that person as obsessive or compulsive, and mutter, «Get a life» Might we better understand zeal as Isaiah does, as the prerogative of God, who, despite the mess we've made of things, still chooses to care for this battered creation and our faulty selves?

PTSD is not a thing, like a virus or a tumour, but rather a label given to specific groupings of psychological symptoms; and while it is true to say that not every woman who has had an abortion suffers from PTSD, a majority do display relevant symptoms.

Yes Ducatihero... «christian»... although I don't use that label... others do for me... I also get atheist (i might get that more so after today's post)... we wouldn't be on the same page I'm sure... but that doesn't bother me... i still believe in the unity of all things... that at the deepest and most fundamental level we are connected, one, and that ideas only seem to divide or separate us.

For Faludi the use of the intellect is a very dangerous thing indeed; it might lead to what she labels «declarations of apostasy,» by which she more or less means disagreement with some or all of her feminist agenda, guaranteed to be the one and only pure product.

some have hailed it as a masterpiece comparable to the works of Dante (First Things), while others have labeled it «obscene» (Boston Globe), «almost sadistic» (Los Angeles Times) and «a sickening death trip» (New Yorker).

I do nt think anyone is saying that people were celebrating Christmas 1500 years ago like they do now, but the whole idea of taking a holiday / seasonal celebration and putting a christian label on it is the same thing as taking something that isnt yours and saying you own it.

As time goes buy the kind defenders of free will over their rejection to «dead» here and colossians 2:13 tend to resort to a familiar defense, that of labeling it a Calvinist viewpoint and that its almost a cultist view point to hold.Very sad yet very much the defense of many christians.Dead may i suggest is dead, the inability to respond, does not mean that prior to being saved one could not read scripture but because of this spiritual deadness its not profitabel / meaningful - we just can not continue to revise the meaning of dead to fit a view point - because natural man has not been born again this deadness (spiritually) shows itself as «none seek after God», in this condition they are» slaves to sin» and the spiritual things of God (the bible) is «folly / foolishness» even the gospel is judged by natural man as «folly / foolishness «(1 cor.1: 18) Please stop with this weak / common defense called Calvinism - many believers are truly turned off by such a defense.We must not forget the man's «free will» is what took the whole human race down in the garden; i would hope we can rise above our love affair with the human will.

To call a person or thing medieval is often to label it as obscurantist; recall the depiction of the «Age of Faith» in the movie The Name of the Rose, in which Sean Connery as Br.

If, as I stated to Christine above, I wanted to label any vague form of those as «god's voice» or «god's mind» or some such thing, I could see how I could do it — but after not doing it so for so long I would so quickly know that is what I am doing that I now think it would be impossible for me to «know god» as I use to.