Imagining that you are knowledgeable about breastfeeding because you have read the propaganda
of the lactivist industry is like imagining that you are knowledgeable about extraterrestrial life because you read about aliens in the «newspapers» at the check out line in the supermarket.
Refusal
of the lactivist community to place a mother's mental health at least equal to her baby's health has exacerbated countless episodes of post-partum depression.
No amount
of lactivist «education» can change the reality that exclusive breastfeeding is not the best choice for everyone and formula companies are needed to fulfill the need for safe substitutes.
In a fascinating PhD dissertation, sociology graduate student Harmony Newman explains the strategies
of the lactivist movement.
I am meanwhile flabbergasted that, although I am a COMPLETE FAILURE in the eyes
of the lactivist movement, my boobs are so rad that they made milk to satisfy my toddler son when he was comfort nursing through a bad time.
One of the illusions
of the lactivist community is that all one needs to breastfeed successfully is a baby and a breast.
I find myself becoming far less
of a lactivist the older my kids get (7 and almost 5 and long weaned) because they present me with far more pressing issues as they get older.
There is no way that this terminology is in any way meant to be taken seriously, even by the most sanctimonious and sensitive
of lactivists.
The sooner we realize that, and stop pandering to the desire
of lactivists to shame any women who doesn't mirror their own choices, the better.
Switching to formula was so hard for me because of the bullying tactics
of lactivists, but it was what had to happen if my child was going to eat.
That's not surprising, since there was never any scientific evidence that it would work in first world countries, just the heartfelt desire on the part
of lactivists to shame and denigrate other women.
You can read the rest of Martha's «revelations» for yourself, but I do want to note one claim beloved
of lactivists:
If they say anything negative about breastfeeding, they will incur the wrath
of lactivists but they can rail against formula and most people nod in agreement.
Maybe they can do that on Planet Boob where most
of the lactivists hide out, but here in the real world, most nursing women have OTHER CHILDREN.
I will admit I didn't actually go as far as starving and totally dehydrating him, as
some of the lactivists on MDC suggested, but I didn't immediately supplement either.
The recent response
of lactivists to the growing body of evidence that aggressive breastfeeding promotion is injuring and in some cases killing infants suggests that lactivism is a form of pseudoscience.
But we live in a world
of lactivists, ho hum.
«Which leads to an important question: how could another woman's choice to breastfeed hurt the children
of lactivists?
Not exact matches
But I had my mother (one
of the original
lactivists) and Dr. Sears, so we relaxed.
I am thankful for the info & support
of online
lactivists & their education
of me.
If the «
lactivists» who share the evils
of formula were out
of the equation, this issue would have a lot less controversy around it.
Some
of the things that your
lactivist friends have reminded you
of do resonate with me, but within a specific context.
It's a troublesome feeling because we're all supposed to be good little
lactivists who never speak unless we're spoken to, and yet by doing so we allow misinformation to be spread like wildfire when we had a chance to correct it... then when we do it only results in more defensiveness, often regardless
of how you phrase it.
Thanks for years
of support,
lactivists!
«Dr. Johnston... developed this sudden and seemingly urgent interest in this issue not via a last minute clinical review
of the scientific literature, or even after consulting with the AAP's own recognized lactation science experts... his concern came immediately after aggressive, personal lobbying by representatives
of one
of the AAP's biggest financial contributors, the $ 3 billion U.S. infant formula industry,» wrote
lactivist Katie Allison Granju in «The Milky Way
of Doing Business,» a rebuttal to the AAP's actions regarding the campaign.
On the many
lactivist blogs and Twitter feeds I followed while researching this book, the words
of Eleanor Roosevelt would be thrown around like paper airplanes in a fourth - grade classroom - inappropriately and haphazardly, and often hitting unintended targets.
But amidst the plethora
of substantial, legitimate information, there is also a cacophony
of foreboding, judgmental voices: «
lactivist» blogs that compare formula feeding to child abuse; public message boards with calls to action - «I automatically feel sorry for the baby sitting in the cart in the formula aisle as their parent loads up on cans
of the stuff.
The International Code
of Marketing Breastmilk Substitutes (known in
lactivist circles as the «WHO Code»), prohibits formula companies from advertising in any conspicuous way: «There should be no advertising or other form
of promotion to the general public
of products within the scope
of this Code,» proclaims article 5.1
of this policy, coauthored in 1981 by UNICEF and the World Health Organization (WHO).
I tried everything that all the Facebook
lactivist mommies and La Leche League forums recommended: nipple shields, mouth exercises, dribbling formula on my nipple like I was in a preschool version
of the candle wax scene from 9 1/2 Weeks.
I am one
of those extended nursing, boob out in public, crunchy
lactivists you sometimes hear about.
Trying to breastfeed for 3 months cost me roughly the same as a year
of formula, so I am really just guessing that its cheaper for some women since all the
lactivists claim it's free.
Lactivists have a very specific view
of women and their bodes.
Not sure I understand... I wasn't making a reference to Christ, I was equating zealous
lactivists to obnoxious people
of any faith who stand on the street corner and shout that all non believers are going to hell if they don't start believing as they do.
For all the
lactivist efforts, the majority
of infants in this country receive formula at some point.
I'm not even touching the issue
of women who have low milk supply even baby is fed at the breast early and often — I think that happens far more often than
lactivists will admit, too.
Instead
of treating women as rational adult human beings who are able to interpret information, report problems, weigh up pros and cons and draw appropriate boundaries, the
lactivist approach is to deny or minimise problems and overstate benefits to the point where women are shamed or guilt tripped into BF beyond the point where they find it acceptable.
Somewhat unrelated but anyone notice that
Lactivists are OBSESSED with highlighting the risk
of cronobacter and formula feeding?
However, in order to truly determine the optimal level
of breastfeeding,
lactivists would first have to admit that there are costs to breastfeeding which they never will do.
But there are so many
lactivists that will simply deny that passive immunity is temporary and limited and insist that breastfed babies are immune to everything the mother is (wrong) and that breastmilk acts as a sort
of general vaccine that prevents babies from catching anything (also wrong).
Here's a newsflash for
lactivists: women formula feed because they want to do so and unless and until you address the real reasons, and stop pretending that this is a giant conspiracy on the part
of «Big Forma,» all your campaigns are doomed to failure.
Unfortunately, most
lactivists ignore that some difficulties just can not be overcome (no amount
of support is going to effect IGT, for example).
It is interesting to note that
lactivists believe that any piece about breastfeeding that don't include illogical, false overly emotional claims isn't «supportive»
of women who breastfeed.
«Why do
lactivists spend so much time proclaiming the awesomeness
of breastfeeding?
Even though I breastfeed for as long as possible (because I want to, not because I am a sheep that is following the crunchy crowd) I am still waiting for these
lactivist to explain to women what they are supposed to do when they are trying to breastfeed, take care
of other children, and have no support taking care
of the household.
Many
lactivists themselves love to play up the erotic nature
of breastfeeding, describing the baby in almost a post-coital bliss after a feed and bragging that «nothing can match the bonding», and making their husbands sound like unwanted suitors.
I often wonder if the
lactivists and vag - worshippers have it partly right, that insufficient supply is quite rare and a good proportion
of «medically indicated» c - sections are in fact unnecesareans.
If breastfeeding is so awesome, why do
lactivists have to spend so much time convincing us
of its awesomeness?
No
lactivist offered to donate any
of those items or pay for them.
Since it is difficult to reconcile
lactivists» claims with the life experience
of these women, it follows that many conclude that the
lactivist's claims are false and nothing more than scare tactics.
Simply because a quiet complaint to the right person may make more
of a difference than exhaustedly telling off a
lactivist for taking advantage
of a captive audience.