That the discriminatory effect
of the law in question derives from or reflects the common law does not alter the fact that the law is discriminatory under the RDA.
If one has any questions with regards to the implementation
of the law in question there is a handy FAQ site to aid you in your traction pursuit and a quick quiz to test your knowledge.
The Law Lords further decided that by committing the error
of law in question the FCC had exceeded the limited authority conferred upon it by Parliament, and that a provision in the statute should not be interpreted so as to enable the FCC to commit errors of law with impunity, thereby effectively determining the extent of its own powers.
There was nothing calling in to question the actual authority of the case but rather its applicability to the point
of law in question.
This is subject to any statutory provision (explained by Lord Justice Ward in Wicks v Wicks [1998] 1 FLR 470, [1998] 3 WLR 277, CA, [1998] 1 All ER 977) covering the field
of law in question.
I do think the idea of allowing something close to judicial notice in place of expert evidence could only have one of two effects: 1) The judge would have decide on a case - by - case basis whether he or she is qualified to advise himself / herself as to «law» generally, or 2) The judge would have to undertake a self - qualification analysis to determine whether he or she is sufficiently expert in the area
of law in question to forego actual expert evidence.
[18] In Dudgeon, the European Court of Human Rights recognised the «fear, suffering and psychological distress directly caused by the very existence
of the laws in question, including fear of harassment and blackmail», [19] and in Norris the Strasbourg Court further noted: [20]
Not exact matches
The raid suggests Mueller may have documents that call into
question the credibility
of Trump and Cohen, even if the materials have nothing to do with Russian meddling, said Jeffrey Cohen, a New York family
law attorney who's not involved
in the case and isn't related to Michael Cohen.
«Our bill, the Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use
of Data (CLOUD) Act, would resolve the
question currently before the Court
in a way that balances consumer,
law enforcement, and privacy interests.
Section 4 says,
in part: «The validity
of the public debt
of the United States, authorized by
law... shall not be
questioned.»
Directors participating
in this survey are asked to answer yes, no or I don't know, and then rank the importance
of 12
questions they might ask themselves while making the decision, such as «Shouldn't the community
laws be upheld?»
«There are going to be tough
questions on both sides,
questions the Supreme Court has not directly answered before
in cases, that this court may not hesitate to stay clear
of,» says Adam Winkler, a professor
of constitutional
law at University
of California, Los Angeles.
But the
question is, as more than half
of all states now have state
laws allowing for medical marijuana and / or adult - use marijuana markets, and the industry has created approximately 150,000 jobs and brought
in almost $ 7 billion
in revenue
in 2016, can the industry be pushed into the black market again?
Robert Chesney, a University
of Texas
law professor, told Business Insider
in an email that the «critical
question» moving forward was «whether and to what extent he has agreed to cooperate with the ongoing investigations
of others
in exchange for this deal.»
«There's no
question the bond markets would be unhappy if a bankruptcy
law were passed, but they're already starting to price
in the prospect
of a default,» Skeel tells me.
Rather, Jared Kushner, the president's son -
in -
law and senior aide tasked with reviving a Middle East peace process, wanted to table the nuclear
question in favor
of simpler alliance - building measures with the Saudis, centered on Trump's visit
in May, according to a person familiar with the discussions.
(Sign
of the times: The website
of a top employment
law firm recently featured a
question from an executive asking if she can fire a worker she saw
in a political protest covered on TV.)
But Sekulow's comment about the Secret Service, and Trump's reported presence at Trump Tower while the meeting was taking place, raise
questions about how plausible it is that his son, campaign manager, son -
in -
law, and Secret Service detail (if they were made aware
of the rendezvous) never told him about it or that he did not attend.
The case raises an array
of labour relations and employment
law questions that will surely be answered
in the weeks and months ahead as more information comes to light.
As
law professor Stan Abrams points out, one
of the key factors differentiating the Apple and Samsung cases is that Samsung owns or controls many
of the factories
in question.
(
In the case of the motivations behind the Indiana law, the incivility in question has in fact been highly organize
In the case
of the motivations behind the Indiana
law, the incivility
in question has in fact been highly organize
in question has
in fact been highly organize
in fact been highly organized.
7th US Circuit Court
of Appeals nominee Amy Coney Barrett, a Notre Dame
law professor, was
questioned intensely about her Catholic faith as a result
of past writings expressing her beliefs on whether Catholic judges should recuse themselves from death - penalty cases if they believed they would be unable to impartially uphold the
law, writing that —
in limited situations — judges should step back
in cases that conflict with their personal conscience.
Depending on the individual retailer and specific countries
in question, many
of the companies could be
in violation
of several kinds
of laws, obscenity among them.
Some
question whether
laws pertaining to the internet and telecommunications are antiquated
in the face
of a company with the global scale and range
of offerings
of Facebook.
How much risk drivers will bear, and what rewards they will enjoy, are very much open
questions,» Brishen Rogers, Associate Professor
of Law at Temple University, said
in a June essay.
«Yet
law enforcement's ability to now unlock an iPhone through an alternative method raises new uncertainties, including
questions about the strength
of security
in Apple devices.
Beyond the battle over at least the temporary future
of the CFPB lies a legal
question: Which federal
law decides who will lead the CFPB — the Federal Vacancies Reform Act, which gives the president the ability to fill many open positions
in the executive branch, or the Dodd - Frank financial reform that created the bureau
in the first place?
I could air,
in public,
questions that will probably be tried
in courts
of law later, and make spotting the contradictions a national parlour game.
Since the Wall Street Journal broke the story
of Cohen's hush money payment to Daniels
in January, there have been
questions about whether the payment violated campaign finance
law.
In addition, and from the point
of view
of companies conducting currency issues,
questions arise regarding the application
of securities
laws.
«After this strong rebuke from the Supreme Court
of Canada, there is no
question that Christy Clark deliberately attacked and undermined public education
in British Columbia — even to the point
of breaking the
law.
«Provincial
law requires proactive release
of the requested public health information without delay,» said opposition environment spokesperson, George Heyman, who
questioned the government
in the house today.
To see how small businesses are integrating bitcoin and other virtual currencies into their payments mix (and elsewhere within their companies), DCC CEO David Berger held the following
question - and - answer discussion with Chris Werner, founder
of Werner Business
Law in Chicago.
In addition, there are a lot
of questions about what taxes apply to the crowd sale and what liability
laws apply for token sales.
«As the very first generation
of retirement «do - it - yourselfers» boomers have important, valid
questions and many mistakenly assume that everything they need to know is easily and accurately spelled out
in some free online internet resource or available through their advisors,» says Cheryl, a J.D. from Roger Williams University School
of Law,
in Bristol, RI.
«
In the meetings I attended, OMB asked
questions about process, alternatives considered, and the cost / benefit analysis,» said Sweeney, referring to her past rulemaking experiences as senior benefit
law specialist for the Office
of Regulations and Interpretations at the DOL.
This is being debated amongst Jewish rabbi's
in various streams
of their faith (Reform, Conservative, and Orthodox) based around the
question «can it be a transgression
of the
law if one can not choose otherwise»?
This act has now become the
law of the land and requires that patients on admission to a hospital or other institutions
in receipt
of federal health care funds be
questioned about Advance Directives» which are a Living Will, Health Care Agent, Durable Power
of Attorney» so that if unable to express an opinion, the patient's wishes concerning life - sustaining technologies will have been made known.
Not all Jews believe this, BTW, but
in Judaism I have yet to run across someone who believe that G - d would punish anyone for their «beliefs» and not their «deeds» (take a good look at the Tanach... the contract with the Jews (known as the «teachings
of G - d», not «the
law») is all about behaviour; and while many Christians have been raised to view «the teachings
of G - d» (the
law) as something to be «freed» from... one has to ask the simple
question..
Even
in classical theism, the
question of whether God is «above the
law» is deeply complex and quite possibly aporetic, since if God has a nature, it seems to follow that God is dependent on that nature.
MoJ's Rob Vischer uses this story about the culture
of marital infidelity
in Russia to raise
questions about the relationship between
law and cultural norms
in maintaining general public adherence to the practices constitutive
of healthy family life.
It is worth noting that Judge Miner's inability to parse that distinction was not shared by the New York State Task Force on Life and the
Law, a twenty - four member commission appointed by Governor Cuomo
in 1985 to advise on
questions of biomedical ethics.
The ordained leaders
of the Church, and the laity who are Christ's principal witnesses
in the public square, do not enter public life proclaiming, «The Church teaches...» When the
question at issue is an immoral practice, they enter the debate saying, «This is wicked; it can not be sanctioned by the
law and here is why, as any reasonable person will grasp.»
Well, chaddy boy, if you can show me
in the bible (the only source you have that tells you about god) where is says that god exists outside
of time and space, that god runs the universe which is why the
laws of the universe exists, and many other
questions, I'll be more inclined to listen...
I will not argue whether or not the bible is the word
of a god translated by man, my only
question is, why would you follow a book that supports and idolizes a single deity who seems to have intentions
of converting the world to his worship alone (for if there are no other gods, why then would Yahweh require that you «hold no other gods above him» — he just confirmed their existance) when said deity's followers have proven that their purpose
in life is to grind any opposition to their «holy
law» into dust?
Those
questions involve the nature
of the PRC regime; the doctrine and canon
law of the Church; the impact
of such an agreement on Vatican diplomacy
in promoting human rights; and the Church's twenty - first - century mission
in China.
A
question, as i am curious... Should the «
laws» change
in relationship to the issue
of gay's being allowed marriage, and full equal rights, would you and the Mormon Church come out and «change it's position and say, we are following our government and it's
laws which say it (gay marriage) is o.k..
Whether it is changing text books to teach religion as a «science,» making
laws that prohibit stem - cell research which would without
question help those
in need, to stopping
of any kind
of gay rights, trying to put religion (christianity) into schools, a woman's right to choose, etc, etc...
Typically this process leads to a characterization
of God as a being so advanced, powerful, immortal, and not subject to the
laws of time, matter, and space that his followers can make up any excuse they choose to address
questions, since nothing about their god (or gods) can be subjected to any kind
of objective verification or scrutiny, just like everything else
in the religion.
JUDGING THE JUDGES Patrick McKinley Brennan's review «The Forms Behind the
Laws» (April) begs fundamental
questions of interpretation, blurs the distinction between legislating and judging, and proposes a mode
of judicial interpretation that would,
in its practical application, be indistinguishable from judges who make decisions based on personal preference.