Sentences with phrase «of leaving the marriage»

«Any indication of leaving the marriage can be significant and a difficult hurdle in therapy.

She revealed that she and Kim's father had never resumed sexual relations after she discovered the abuse, and that thoughts of leaving the marriage were always with her.

Gordon confessed that he was emotionally involved with his secretary, and was thinking of leaving the marriage.

Not exact matches

Cabinet ministers have been at odds over policy, including citizenship laws, the national vote on same - sex marriage and competition reform, as well as being left out of the decision loop on a series of «captain's picks» by the prime minister.

Many jurisdictions prevent a spouse from being disinherited, for example, so a court might void provisions in a will that leaves everything to your kids from a first marriage, said Joslin Davis, president of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers.

Our expectations for what we want the marriage to provide us have gotten higher in a lot of ways, more sophisticated in a number of other ways, more emotional, more psychological, and because of this additional complexity, more of our marriages are falling short, leaving us disappointed.

Wilson mentioned that, «In a traditional marriage, where the wife doesn't work or works little, a simple 50/50 splitting of assets can leave the woman broke.

The 27 - year - old alleged golddigger thought her 90 - year - old husband would leave her a hefty sum when he passed away in 1995 after their marriage of just over a year.

Naw, reality - its pretty bi-partisan-whopping 70 % of americans back teh repeal Its just fairness you can scream abotu marriage left and right, btu when peopel put up their lives for the country and have to hide who they are - only the truly bigoted and hateful stand in the way!

«Obama stressed in the interview that his support was personal and that he would leave the issue of marriage to the states.

When the Supreme Court came down on the side of «marriage equality,» it deprived the left of an equality agenda congenial to its efficiency - oriented leadership.

Thus, the problem with leaving on the basis that gay marriage is a gospel issue is that CCCU's membership is so diverse that it embodies at best only a very minimal understanding of what the gospel is.

Though Orthodox Jews tend to be more socially conservative on issues like gay marriage, the overwhelming majority of American Jews belong to the Conservative or Reform movements, or are secular, and all those groups lean left.

In addition, his comments leave some of us non-Catholics asking, Is the Pope right about the state of marriage and culture's idea of commitment?

Dear Abby hopeless Mom and wife ism, you have been bored in suburb by sexual fantasies pool boy, hooker and Abbyism, feeling guilty, by committing Abbyism fantasy not with husband ism against innocent of marriage, now it is time for vibrator to leave Abbyism, faithful ism and Abby adultry ism, hopeless romantic ism, be sexual fantasies pool boy and act according to lust of American housewife boredom with hubby muscular suntan ism GOD HE»S HOT, free yourself from sexual fantasies pool boy, filth of genitals is, fantasy, you two martini's at noon micro bikini pizza dare and act like slut by flaunting hot bod of massage therapist ism of One mom under boredom with hubby muscular suntan ism GOD HE»S HOT and bulge inequality.

The sterilization of marriage leaves us focused on our own satisfaction, thereby robbing us of the capacity to forget ourselves in sexual union.

With the Supreme Court striking down the Defense of Marriage Act last year and same - sex marriage now imposed by court after court, it's hard to sustain the illusion, much cherished by the secular left as a scare tactic, that our country is on the brink of a theocratic tMarriage Act last year and same - sex marriage now imposed by court after court, it's hard to sustain the illusion, much cherished by the secular left as a scare tactic, that our country is on the brink of a theocratic tmarriage now imposed by court after court, it's hard to sustain the illusion, much cherished by the secular left as a scare tactic, that our country is on the brink of a theocratic takeover.

These decisions leave the future of marriage and family in America up to its citizens.

That decision applies to just the two couples named in the suit (same - sex advocates declined to file a class - action suit) leaving the future of marriage policy in California in question.

As an atheist who believes in «Choice» (I dislike the idea of abortion but see the need for people to be able to opt for it) and polygamy (marriage should be for any number of consenting adults regardless of gender) and believes that the idea of draconian anti-gun measures is anathema as it takes away an individual's right to live the way he wants to live, I think that if believing in a deity makes a person treat other people nicer then we should leave that person and his beliefs alone.

As for marriage and other similar stuff, it should be left to the judgement of each educated and capable individual.

(A decision for same - sex marriage by a state could as in the case of Massachusetts, preempts the debate in that state, but it is less far - reaching because it leaves other states to arrive at a different conclusion — unless, as some same - sex - marriage proponents have claimed, other states are required to recognize such marriages under the Constitution's requirement of giving «full faith and credit» to other states» proceedings.)

Alexander III, following the ancient tradition of the Church declared that «After a lawfully accorded consent affecting the present, it is allowed to one of the parties, even against the will of the other, to choose a monastery (just as certain saints have been called from marriage), provided that carnal intercourse shall not have taken place between them; and it is allowed to the one who is left to proceed to a second marriage» (III Decretal., xxxii, 2).

When she told her pastor of her intent to leave her abuser, he shamed her for breaking the sacred bond of marriage.

Christians are then left pointing to sociological maladies to vindicate our claims or appealing to the authority of a «pure science» which doesn't exist; or in the case of «same sex marriage,» we're reduced to pleading for private exemptions from public «justice.»

He uproots family existence by telling people that they must be willing to leave behind familial structures and that marriage is decidedly this - worldly — while also grounding the union of male and female, and thus the biological offspring of that union, in creation.

The Supreme Court, meanwhile, has declared the traditional understanding of marriage anathema, and left wide open many vexing questions about the standing of individuals, groups, and institutions who continue to uphold that understanding.

In these letters, we explored our values and all the day - to - day practical concerns that, if left unresolved, could trigger domestic wars, potentially break a marriage, and kill the sparkle and warm blush of romantic love.

The purity imperative means that students sometimes misrepresent their sexual pasts to friends and partners, and this leaves them uncertain about the place of physical attraction in an intimate relationship moving toward marriage.

Some have argued that pastorally the Church should leave marriage and all sexual matters up to the conscience of the person.

Again the trouble may lie in factors harder to cope with — domestic disharmony, friction in one's work, a job one loathes but fears to leave, worry about the future, lack of success in some pivotal enterprise, separation by distance, by marriage, or by death from one who is deeply loved.

Unfortunately, the present volume can easily leave one with the impression that the movement from sacrament to contract represents a progression of marriage theory from shadow to light.

Although the American Catholic community has been confronted with yet more difficulties — ranging from the redefinition of marriage to assaults on religious liberty — one of the reasons for hope, moving forward, is that John Paul II left behind a rich spiritual and intellectual infrastructure for Americans to draw upon, to deal with these ongoing challenges.

Sane people can disagree about whether there ought to be a right to privacy, i.e., about whether it is logically a natural right and if so perhaps ought to be put into the Constitution via amendment, or about whether we (usually at state - level) should pass particular laws, such as ones that legalize gay - marriage, that factually expand what might be called privacy, but no sane U.S. Citizen, gay, straight, liberal, or conservative, should be left ignorant about the Constitution - wounding judicial usurpations done in the name of this right, more of which are planned to be done soon enough.

Otherwise we will be left only with Gold's meager hope that marriage and all of morality might somehow survive the ravages of culture.

It is not the will of God that children suffer from hunger and malnutrition and grow up in unsanitary slums with lack of proper education, that persons because of the color of their skin are debarred from schools, hospitals, employment, or housing projects; that persons are denied other basic human rights; that personalities and homes are broken through drink and that great numbers die on highways through drunken driving; that marriage vows are often taken lightly and that easy divorces shatter home after home and leave children the pawns of the parents» selfishness.

They warn that the distorted values of a cohabiting relationship, if left unexamined, may persist and poison the marriage.

Neocons, he argues, have grown increasingly uncomfortable in the marriage «of «convenience with Christian conservatives they entered into in the 1980s in order to defeat the left, and they welcomed (instigated?)

But according to Senator Gavin Marshall, chairman of the «Left federal parliamentary Labor Party caucus,» writing in The Age, Gillard's decision to allow a «conscience vote» on «gay marriage» is «not democratic,» because it «exposes individual parliamentarians to powerful conservative lobby groups» and the retrograde opinions of those «stubbornly opposed to all social reforms.»

But often, marriage counseling is painful as couples are unable to keep the marriage together, and I am witness to the heartbreak of a divorce and the tragic wake of destruction it leaves in their lives and the lives of their families.

You allow them to simply talk about the passages of life: divorce, children leaving home, alternative marriages, and the simple joy of finding a job.

Thus when Prime Minister Julia Gillard (an avowed atheist who makes Nancy Pelosi seem like Margaret Thatcher) nonetheless announced that a «gay marriage» proposal would get a «conscience vote» in the federal parliament, she was accused by her lefter - than - left opponents of being... undemocratic.

The Future of Marriage begins with and repeatedly returns to a conversation with prominent attorney and gay rights advocate Evan Wolfson that left Blankenhorn extremely worried that the «movement for same - sex marriage is going to winMarriage begins with and repeatedly returns to a conversation with prominent attorney and gay rights advocate Evan Wolfson that left Blankenhorn extremely worried that the «movement for same - sex marriage is going to winmarriage is going to win.»

The film, Scene's from a Marriage, leaves unexamined the questions of how to redeem community in the larger society; it seems to have gone irrevocably to the devil as it has become technically more nearly perfect.

Scene's from a Marriage leaves unexamined the questions of how to redeem community in the larger society; it seems, as Johan says, to have gone irrevocably to the devil as it has become technically more nearly perfect.

The candidates for the status of covenanters were exhorted to search their hearts as to whether they had the strength to leave possessions behind, to renounce marriage for ever, and to accept the ascetic life.

A honest solution then would be for Christians to lobby government to do away with the secular, contractual and other legal elements of marriage, leaving no tax or other legal advantage to it that gay couples would find appealing.

In contrast, the couple which has stayed connected through the previous stages or achieved re-connection during the child - leaving stage, finds that the empty nest offers them all sorts of new opportunities for enjoying their marriage.

One of the essential functions of a good marriage is for the partners to provide encouragement and support to each other as they go through anxiety - producing periods of crisis — pregnancy, illness, children growing up and leaving home, deaths of parents, husband's retirement.

Destruction of the marriage for those who want to leave and one spouse has been co-erced by church leadership that you are now a bad influence.