So this is not a garden variety negligence case
of legal malpractice where the lawyer blew the statute of limitations or missed a key court date; this attorney knew his strategy did not have the «99 % chance» of success he claimed to his clients, yet he pursued it exclusively and his clients relied entirely upon his advice.
Not exact matches
The SJC for the first time ruled that a judicial error
of law does not bar recovery in a
legal malpractice case
where a defendant law firm was negligent for failing to prevent or mitigate the
legal error.
Prior to joining Marshall Dennehey, Nicholas was a member
of a New York firm
where he focused his practice on the defense
of law firms and attorneys in
legal malpractice actions, commercial and corporate litigation, and cases brought under New York's Labor Law.
[
Legal malpractice claim failed
where lawyers gave competent opinion on defensibility
of underlying claims, and
where plaintiff failed to demonstrate loss caused by attorney's
malpractice.]
When an individual contacts an attorney, they will typically meet for a lengthy initial consultation,
where the lawyer will have the patient sign medical authorization forms which will allow the
legal team to access all
of the patient's medical records from the medical mistake, as well as their previous and subsequent medical records in order to gain a comprehensive understanding
of the patient's health and medical history before the
malpractice occurred.
Be it workers compensation or personal injury and wrongful death occurring outside the workplace, such as: car accidents, dram shop actions (
where a bar or restaurant serves a customer to the point
of legal intoxication), medical
malpractice, defective products, construction accidents, premises liability (e.g., slip and falls based on failure to provide a safe place to walk or play), or any other type
of preventable injury or death.
In a case
where a hospital employee commits
malpractice, the hospital itself may be held liable under the
legal doctrine
of «respondeat superior.»
Summary Dismissal Affirmed In
Legal Malpractice Case
Where Plaintiff Failed To Show That «Pertinent Decision Makers»
Of Government Agency «Would Have» Agreed To A «Better Result» But For The Alleged Incorrect Legal Advice Given By Lawyer During Settlement Negotiations Manveen Saluja, M.D v Honigman Miller Schwartz And Cohn LLP, et al, Unpublished Per Curiam Opinion of the Michigan Court of Appeals, issued March 16, 2017 (Docket No. 33036
Of Government Agency «Would Have» Agreed To A «Better Result» But For The Alleged Incorrect
Legal Advice Given By Lawyer During Settlement Negotiations Manveen Saluja, M.D v Honigman Miller Schwartz And Cohn LLP, et al, Unpublished Per Curiam Opinion
of the Michigan Court of Appeals, issued March 16, 2017 (Docket No. 33036
of the Michigan Court
of Appeals, issued March 16, 2017 (Docket No. 33036
of Appeals, issued March 16, 2017 (Docket No. 330367)
Unlike most negligence cases,
where the top
legal fee 1/3
of the recovery,
malpractice legal fees are substantially lower.
«Business Enterprise Exclusion» Defeats Coverage
Where Entity Claiming
Legal Malpractice was Managed and 27 % Owned by Partners
of Law Firm Accused
of Malpractice.
Prior to joining The Patterson Law Firm, LLC in September
of 2012, Mr. Katz worked for The Spellmire Law Firm
where he personally handled numerous
legal malpractice and professional liability cases.
In some law schools this takes the form
of «
legal residency programs»
where recent graduates offer low - cost
legal assistance while attending seminars on obtaining and billing clients,
malpractice insurance and setting up a law office.