The collapse of communism has in turn been supplanted by a fraying
of the liberal consensus and history is seen to be a never ending string comprised of an indeterminate number of threads.
As with the old champions
of liberal consensus, they want to eliminate from academia those who do not broadly share their outlook.
The movement to remake Canada — to shred the remnants
of the liberal consensus that governed this land for most of the past half - century — took a giant step last night with the election of a majority Conservative government.
Not exact matches
Political scientist Keith Brownsey
of Mount Royal University argues the
Liberals paid close attention to the many fumbles made by Harper's Tories on the energy file: failing to build solid relationships with First Nations, allowing environmental groups to seize the public - relations initiative, not asserting federal authority and handing provinces like B.C. and Quebec control
of the political agenda, keeping Canada outside
of the international
consensus on climate change, and ignoring legitimate criticisms
of the federal review process.
The Alberta
Liberal Opposition looks to moderate the excesses
of these extremes by offering ideas, not platitudes and
consensus, not division.
Protestant Christianity, by contrast, was initially able to accommodate
liberal enlightenment ideas without jeopardizing the framework
of a broad Christian
consensus.
There is a loss
of confidence in the
liberal consensus and a cautious approach to Rome now that the game has changed.
This
liberal consensus was sorely tested, however, by the emergence
of a black caucus which was then challenged by an integrationist caucus.
This overall agenda would not differ from those
of most
liberal Protestant or Jewish groups — except in the high level
of consensus, and in the fact that the most important religious goal for UUs is «a community for shared values» (rather than theology or personal growth or social change or experiences
of transcendence).
In thus explaining and championing religious pluralism on affirmative theological grounds rather than on negative or concessionary ones,
liberal Protestants could make one
of the more important
of their distinctive contributions to the moral coherence «and
consensus that our sprawling society needs but has found it difficult to maintain.
The usual assertions are (1) that this kind
of religion is today on the defensive; (2) that the defensive posture is occasioned by the flourishing
of «conservative churches» (although the alleged
liberal enervation is also seen in more autonomous terms); (3) that the growth in religious conservatism and conservative churches is itself the result
of widespread reaction against «secular humanist» values and against those who hold such values; (4) that our society as a whole has been experiencing a breakdown in moral
consensus, a loss
of moral coherence somehow connected with a decline in oldline Protestant dominance; and (5) that some or all
of these happenings have been quite sudden, so that the early 1960s can be taken as a kind
of benchmark — as a time before the fall.
Rorty calls us «the
liberal Rawlsian searchers for
consensus» and «the community
of the
liberal intellectuals
of the secular modern West» (CIS 12).
I suggest that Flanders contact Shelby Steele for an opinion about the true price
of criticizing the
liberal consensus in academia.
The more
liberal Krishna Kanth, the Governor
of Andhra Pradesh, in his address to the Assembly
of the National Council
of Churches in 1991 and following it in a press interview with Neerge Choudhury (Indian Express 21 Oct. 1991) «called for an end to religious conversion in the country, not by law but by a voluntary
consensus of religious leaders», because in his opinion, communal strife is closely linked to conversion.
This does not seem to give room for a policy
of consensus between «conservative» and «
liberal» factions, continually mindful
of political correctness.
«2 The value
consensus of conservative and
liberal Protestants is the middle - class way
of life.
At the same time, attempting to fill the ideological vacuum left by the decline
of the old
liberal - Protestant
consensus is aggressive pluralistic secularism, growing out
of the 1960s and flourishing as students
of the 1960s become the tenured scholars
of the 1980s and 1990s.
Liberal Protestants and secularists furthermore agreed that the scientific age bad brought with it higher - level moral principles that could form the basis for a
consensus of values that would benefit all humanity.
Humane
liberal arts and practical approaches might be in competition, with the pragmatic gaining ground, yet most American educators agreed that there ought to be an integrative
consensus of democratic values.
By the mid-sixties, two forces were converging to destroy the secularized
liberal Protestant (or now secularized Judeo - Christian) Enlightenment
consensus through a sort
of pincer action.
Clearly, it seems to me, it would be impossible for us to return to the days
of a Christian
consensus,
liberal or conservative, even if we wanted to.
Moreover, Berlin's essay defended the
liberal democratic project in such a way as to reinforce the
liberal anti-Communist
consensus that historians still associate with men such as President Harry Truman, Secretary
of State Dean Acheson, Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson, and Senators Hubert H. Humphrey and Henry M. Jackson.
Henry rejected
liberal versions
of the social gospel which tended to be all social and no gospel, but he appealed to an earlier evangelical
consensus of cultural engagement that included the work
of William Wilberforce in campaigning for the abolition
of the slave trade in England, the revivalist impulses
of Charles G. Finney against slavery in this country, as well as evangelical concerns for suffrage, temperance, child labor laws, fair wages for workers, and many other progressive issues to which many theologically conservative Christians were once committed» before what David Moberg has called «the great reversal,» an evangelical withdrawal from such concerns.
Whatever is distinctive about Judaism has been left out
of account either because it does not accord with the
liberal consensus or because Jews lack a public philosophy
of adequate complexity to mediate the values
of their tradition to the culture at large.
The spectacular rise
of anti-establishment parties has buried the
liberal consensus on which Europe's security was so dependent over the past three decades.
The Pact introduced
Liberal ideas into Labour's ideological repertory, although this would surely have made little impact, but for the subsequent demise
of the post-War pro-Labour
consensus, and the long and much - resented Tory «interregnum» that ensued.
In Labour, key binding decisions were crafted by consenting comrades in compositing cabals, the
Liberals braved the perilous political fringes to challenge the timid and brain - comatose, while the Tories orgied in flag - waving Nuremberg Rally - induced hysteria — all no more, drowned in the syrup sea
of consensus.
Our argument is that Labour's move to the «
liberal consensus» on the EU and immigration left many
of their core voters out in the cold a long time before UKIP were an effective political presence.
If Labour, the
Liberal Democrats, the Greens or the SNP were pushed to define the nature and purpose
of a UK constitutional convention, it is almost certain that any
consensus would fall apart very quickly.
He said: «There is a view now in many parts
of the world that the only way to ensure prosperity and stability is to suppress freedom to crack down on pesky NGOs and irritating journalists and independent judges and generally to deprecate the western
liberal consensus about how a society should be ordered.
That is the heart
of the issue,» he said, adding that: «Of course if there is no consensus, well then it is something at the general election, the parties will have to stake out their positions, but I think there is a strong view in England among the people of England as well the Conservative party and I think many Liberal Democrats as well.&raqu
of the issue,» he said, adding that: «
Of course if there is no consensus, well then it is something at the general election, the parties will have to stake out their positions, but I think there is a strong view in England among the people of England as well the Conservative party and I think many Liberal Democrats as well.&raqu
Of course if there is no
consensus, well then it is something at the general election, the parties will have to stake out their positions, but I think there is a strong view in England among the people
of England as well the Conservative party and I think many Liberal Democrats as well.&raqu
of England as well the Conservative party and I think many
Liberal Democrats as well.»
Worst
of all is the sense that a fear pervades the Coalition Government
of taking on the
liberal consensus in the media.
This democratic fight, must engage people with a social
liberal vision for the future to replace the Thatcherite
consensus and the broken ideas
of the right.
The
consensus is that not only is Cuomo returning to his
liberal roots after two years
of austerity proposals, but he's positioning himself as a true - blue Democrat should he run for president in 2016.
There is near
consensus among
liberals and conservatives that the mayor, any mayor, should ultimately be in charge
of the schools.
Their realignment was about perpetuating the neoliberal
consensus through an alliance
of New Labour and Orange Book
liberals as the alternative to the Tories.
[60] However, in his account
of Labour's negotiations with the
Liberal Democrats, Andrew Adonis — who participated in the talks — writes that the general
consensus among members
of Gordon Brown's cabinet was that talks between the Conservatives and
Liberal Democrats would reach an impasse.»
The main trends I argued against in that essay were the
liberal consensus, the persistence
of class and the permanence
of monopoly and oligopoly.
The one education reform that appears still to have a fair degree
of liberal - conservative support, if not necessarily
consensus, is charter schooling.
After surveying a huge body
of literature about the role
of education in political socialization, political scientists M. Kent Jennings and Richard Niemi reported a broad
consensus that interest in politics, the possession
of political skills, political participation, and support for the
liberal democratic creed all increase with years
of schooling.
Greater understanding that there is a scientific
consensus about the reality
of the phenomenon among Independents and
liberals;
For example, before proposing that the expert
consensus for AGW is politically biased, shouldn't you in all humility trace the political biases
of Joseph Fourier, John Tyndall, Svante Arrhenius and so forth through the present, and show us where a «
liberal» bias crept in?
Environmental and climate scientists in the U.S. are overwhelmingly
liberal; Kerry Emanuel has been identified as one
of the very few
consensus climate scientists that is Republican (and one
of the few that will interact with skeptics, see the EconTalk interview).
Overall, Democrats and
liberals are more likely than Republicans and conservatives to say the Earth is warming, human activity is the cause
of the change, the problem is serious and there is scientific
consensus about the climate changes underway and the threat it poses to the planet.
People's political orientations are strongly related to their perception
of the scientific
consensus on climate change.4 In this survey, a strong majority
of liberal Democrats (88 %) say most climate scientists think the Earth is warming due to human activity.
The BBC's 2007 impartiality report reflects widespread support for the idea that there is «some sort
of BBC
liberal consensus».
of the Leftist,
liberal fascist, enviro - wackpot part
of the country was allied and conspiring together in a conspicuous
consensus of un-Americanism to bring capitalism down, along with a willing mainstream media and a broken governmental - funded education machine as the eager facilitators
of the hoax with millions being spent for endless filing cabinets full
of junk research.
Predictably, 55 percent
of liberal Democrats trust there's a widespread
consensus among climate scientists regarding the causes
of warming.
Confirming all four hypotheses, the regression analyses showed that greater expertise, more
liberal ideology, greater perceived
consensus, and lower perceived conflict each predicted higher levels
of certainty global warming was occurring, higher likelihood
of viewing it as mostly human caused, and greater ratings
of future harm.
In this paper we tested four hypotheses: (1) perceived conflict about global warming will be negatively associated — and (2) climate expertise, (3)
liberal political ideology, and (4) perceived scientific
consensus will be positively associated — with (a) higher personal certainty that global warming is happening, (b) viewing the global warming observed over the past 150 years as mostly human - caused, and (c) perception
of global warming as harmful.